Cargando…
Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements: Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction
BACKGROUND: Cardiac MRI measurements have diagnostic and prognostic value in the evaluation of cardiopulmonary disease. Artificial intelligence approaches to automate cardiac MRI segmentation are emerging but require clinical testing. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a deep learning tool for quantit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Radiological Society of North America
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212929 |
_version_ | 1784801063106248704 |
---|---|
author | Alabed, Samer Alandejani, Faisal Dwivedi, Krit Karunasaagarar, Kavita Sharkey, Michael Garg, Pankaj de Koning, Patrick J. H. Tóth, Attila Shahin, Yousef Johns, Christopher Mamalakis, Michail Stott, Sarah Capener, David Wood, Steven Metherall, Peter Rothman, Alexander M. K. Condliffe, Robin Hamilton, Neil Wild, James M. O’Regan, Declan P. Lu, Haiping Kiely, David G. van der Geest, Rob J. Swift, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Alabed, Samer Alandejani, Faisal Dwivedi, Krit Karunasaagarar, Kavita Sharkey, Michael Garg, Pankaj de Koning, Patrick J. H. Tóth, Attila Shahin, Yousef Johns, Christopher Mamalakis, Michail Stott, Sarah Capener, David Wood, Steven Metherall, Peter Rothman, Alexander M. K. Condliffe, Robin Hamilton, Neil Wild, James M. O’Regan, Declan P. Lu, Haiping Kiely, David G. van der Geest, Rob J. Swift, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Alabed, Samer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac MRI measurements have diagnostic and prognostic value in the evaluation of cardiopulmonary disease. Artificial intelligence approaches to automate cardiac MRI segmentation are emerging but require clinical testing. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a deep learning tool for quantitative evaluation of cardiac MRI functional studies and assess its use for prognosis in patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter and multivendor data set was used to develop a deep learning–based cardiac MRI contouring model using a cohort of patients suspected of having cardiopulmonary disease from multiple pathologic causes. Correlation with same-day right heart catheterization (RHC) and scan-rescan repeatability was assessed in prospectively recruited participants. Prognostic impact was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of 3487 patients from the ASPIRE (Assessing the Severity of Pulmonary Hypertension In a Pulmonary Hypertension Referral Centre) registry, including a subset of 920 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The generalizability of the automatic assessment was evaluated in 40 multivendor studies from 32 centers. RESULTS: The training data set included 539 patients (mean age, 54 years ± 20 [SD]; 315 women). Automatic cardiac MRI measurements were better correlated with RHC parameters than were manual measurements, including left ventricular stroke volume (r = 0.72 vs 0.68; P = .03). Interstudy repeatability of cardiac MRI measurements was high for all automatic measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.79–0.99) and similarly repeatable to manual measurements (all paired t test P > .05). Automated right ventricle and left ventricle cardiac MRI measurements were associated with mortality in patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSION: An automatic cardiac MRI measurement approach was developed and tested in a large cohort of patients, including a broad spectrum of right ventricular and left ventricular conditions, with internal and external testing. Fully automatic cardiac MRI assessment correlated strongly with invasive hemodynamics, had prognostic value, were highly repeatable, and showed excellent generalizability. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03841344 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Ambale-Venkatesh and Lima in this issue. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on June 27, 2022. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9527336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Radiological Society of North America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95273362023-10-01 Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements: Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction Alabed, Samer Alandejani, Faisal Dwivedi, Krit Karunasaagarar, Kavita Sharkey, Michael Garg, Pankaj de Koning, Patrick J. H. Tóth, Attila Shahin, Yousef Johns, Christopher Mamalakis, Michail Stott, Sarah Capener, David Wood, Steven Metherall, Peter Rothman, Alexander M. K. Condliffe, Robin Hamilton, Neil Wild, James M. O’Regan, Declan P. Lu, Haiping Kiely, David G. van der Geest, Rob J. Swift, Andrew J. Radiology Original Research BACKGROUND: Cardiac MRI measurements have diagnostic and prognostic value in the evaluation of cardiopulmonary disease. Artificial intelligence approaches to automate cardiac MRI segmentation are emerging but require clinical testing. PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a deep learning tool for quantitative evaluation of cardiac MRI functional studies and assess its use for prognosis in patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter and multivendor data set was used to develop a deep learning–based cardiac MRI contouring model using a cohort of patients suspected of having cardiopulmonary disease from multiple pathologic causes. Correlation with same-day right heart catheterization (RHC) and scan-rescan repeatability was assessed in prospectively recruited participants. Prognostic impact was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of 3487 patients from the ASPIRE (Assessing the Severity of Pulmonary Hypertension In a Pulmonary Hypertension Referral Centre) registry, including a subset of 920 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The generalizability of the automatic assessment was evaluated in 40 multivendor studies from 32 centers. RESULTS: The training data set included 539 patients (mean age, 54 years ± 20 [SD]; 315 women). Automatic cardiac MRI measurements were better correlated with RHC parameters than were manual measurements, including left ventricular stroke volume (r = 0.72 vs 0.68; P = .03). Interstudy repeatability of cardiac MRI measurements was high for all automatic measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.79–0.99) and similarly repeatable to manual measurements (all paired t test P > .05). Automated right ventricle and left ventricle cardiac MRI measurements were associated with mortality in patients suspected of having pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSION: An automatic cardiac MRI measurement approach was developed and tested in a large cohort of patients, including a broad spectrum of right ventricular and left ventricular conditions, with internal and external testing. Fully automatic cardiac MRI assessment correlated strongly with invasive hemodynamics, had prognostic value, were highly repeatable, and showed excellent generalizability. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03841344 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Ambale-Venkatesh and Lima in this issue. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on June 27, 2022. Radiological Society of North America 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9527336/ /pubmed/35699578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212929 Text en © 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published under a (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) CC BY 4.0 license. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alabed, Samer Alandejani, Faisal Dwivedi, Krit Karunasaagarar, Kavita Sharkey, Michael Garg, Pankaj de Koning, Patrick J. H. Tóth, Attila Shahin, Yousef Johns, Christopher Mamalakis, Michail Stott, Sarah Capener, David Wood, Steven Metherall, Peter Rothman, Alexander M. K. Condliffe, Robin Hamilton, Neil Wild, James M. O’Regan, Declan P. Lu, Haiping Kiely, David G. van der Geest, Rob J. Swift, Andrew J. Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements: Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction |
title | Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements:
Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction |
title_full | Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements:
Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction |
title_fullStr | Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements:
Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements:
Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction |
title_short | Validation of Artificial Intelligence Cardiac MRI Measurements:
Relationship to Heart Catheterization and Mortality Prediction |
title_sort | validation of artificial intelligence cardiac mri measurements:
relationship to heart catheterization and mortality prediction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alabedsamer validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT alandejanifaisal validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT dwivedikrit validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT karunasaagararkavita validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT sharkeymichael validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT gargpankaj validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT dekoningpatrickjh validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT tothattila validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT shahinyousef validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT johnschristopher validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT mamalakismichail validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT stottsarah validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT capenerdavid validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT woodsteven validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT metherallpeter validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT rothmanalexandermk validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT condlifferobin validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT hamiltonneil validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT wildjamesm validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT oregandeclanp validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT luhaiping validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT kielydavidg validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT vandergeestrobj validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction AT swiftandrewj validationofartificialintelligencecardiacmrimeasurementsrelationshiptoheartcatheterizationandmortalityprediction |