Cargando…

Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the results of osteochondral transplant using autografts or allografts for talar osteochondral defect are equivalent. PURPOSE: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare allografts and autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PRO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migliorini, Filippo, Maffulli, Nicola, Baroncini, Alice, Eschweiler, Jörg, Knobe, Matthias, Tingart, Markus, Schenker, Hanno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211037349
_version_ 1784801087908216832
author Migliorini, Filippo
Maffulli, Nicola
Baroncini, Alice
Eschweiler, Jörg
Knobe, Matthias
Tingart, Markus
Schenker, Hanno
author_facet Migliorini, Filippo
Maffulli, Nicola
Baroncini, Alice
Eschweiler, Jörg
Knobe, Matthias
Tingart, Markus
Schenker, Hanno
author_sort Migliorini, Filippo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the results of osteochondral transplant using autografts or allografts for talar osteochondral defect are equivalent. PURPOSE: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare allografts and autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), MRI findings, and complications. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in February 2021. All studies investigating the outcomes of allograft and/or autograft osteochondral transplant as management for osteochondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Data concerning the rates of failure and revision surgery were also collected. Continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD), whereas binary data were evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) effect measure. RESULTS: Data from 40 studies (1174 procedures) with a mean follow-up of 46.5 ± 25 months were retrieved. There was comparability concerning the length of follow-up, male to female ratio, mean age, body mass index, defect size, VAS score, and AOFAS score (P > .1) between the groups at baseline. At the last follow-up, the MOCART (MD, 10.5; P = .04) and AOFAS (MD, 4.8; P = .04) scores were better in the autograft group. The VAS score was similar between the 2 groups (P = .4). At the last follow-up, autografts demonstrated lower rate of revision surgery (OR, 7.2; P < .0001) and failure (OR, 5.1; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Based on the main findings of the present systematic review, talar osteochondral transplant using allografts was associated with higher rates of failure and revision compared with autografts at midterm follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9527449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95274492022-10-04 Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Migliorini, Filippo Maffulli, Nicola Baroncini, Alice Eschweiler, Jörg Knobe, Matthias Tingart, Markus Schenker, Hanno Am J Sports Med Current Concepts BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the results of osteochondral transplant using autografts or allografts for talar osteochondral defect are equivalent. PURPOSE: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare allografts and autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), MRI findings, and complications. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in February 2021. All studies investigating the outcomes of allograft and/or autograft osteochondral transplant as management for osteochondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Data concerning the rates of failure and revision surgery were also collected. Continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD), whereas binary data were evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) effect measure. RESULTS: Data from 40 studies (1174 procedures) with a mean follow-up of 46.5 ± 25 months were retrieved. There was comparability concerning the length of follow-up, male to female ratio, mean age, body mass index, defect size, VAS score, and AOFAS score (P > .1) between the groups at baseline. At the last follow-up, the MOCART (MD, 10.5; P = .04) and AOFAS (MD, 4.8; P = .04) scores were better in the autograft group. The VAS score was similar between the 2 groups (P = .4). At the last follow-up, autografts demonstrated lower rate of revision surgery (OR, 7.2; P < .0001) and failure (OR, 5.1; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Based on the main findings of the present systematic review, talar osteochondral transplant using allografts was associated with higher rates of failure and revision compared with autografts at midterm follow-up. SAGE Publications 2021-09-23 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9527449/ /pubmed/34554880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211037349 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Current Concepts
Migliorini, Filippo
Maffulli, Nicola
Baroncini, Alice
Eschweiler, Jörg
Knobe, Matthias
Tingart, Markus
Schenker, Hanno
Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort allograft versus autograft osteochondral transplant for chondral defects of the talus: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Current Concepts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465211037349
work_keys_str_mv AT migliorinifilippo allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maffullinicola allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baroncinialice allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eschweilerjorg allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT knobematthias allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tingartmarkus allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schenkerhanno allograftversusautograftosteochondraltransplantforchondraldefectsofthetalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis