Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a gastrointestinal chronic disease with an unpredictable disease course. Computational methods such as machine learning (ML) have the potential to stratify IBD patients for the provision of individualized care. The use of ML methods for IBD was surveye...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izac115 |
_version_ | 1784801112936677376 |
---|---|
author | Stafford, Imogen S Gosink, Mark M Mossotto, Enrico Ennis, Sarah Hauben, Manfred |
author_facet | Stafford, Imogen S Gosink, Mark M Mossotto, Enrico Ennis, Sarah Hauben, Manfred |
author_sort | Stafford, Imogen S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a gastrointestinal chronic disease with an unpredictable disease course. Computational methods such as machine learning (ML) have the potential to stratify IBD patients for the provision of individualized care. The use of ML methods for IBD was surveyed, with an additional focus on how the field has changed over time. METHODS: On May 6, 2021, a systematic review was conducted through a search of MEDLINE and Embase databases, with the search structure (“machine learning” OR “artificial intelligence”) AND (“Crohn* Disease” OR “Ulcerative Colitis” OR “Inflammatory Bowel Disease”). Exclusion criteria included studies not written in English, no human patient data, publication before 2001, studies that were not peer reviewed, nonautoimmune disease comorbidity research, and record types that were not primary research. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (of 409) records met the inclusion criteria. Random forest methods were most prevalent, and there was an increase in neural networks, mainly applied to imaging data sets. The main applications of ML to clinical tasks were diagnosis (18 of 78), disease course (22 of 78), and disease severity (16 of 78). The median sample size was 263. Clinical and microbiome-related data sets were most popular. Five percent of studies used an external data set after training and testing for additional model validation. DISCUSSION: Availability of longitudinal and deep phenotyping data could lead to better modeling. Machine learning pipelines that consider imbalanced data and that feature selection only on training data will generate more generalizable models. Machine learning models are increasingly being applied to more complex clinical tasks for specific phenotypes, indicating progress towards personalized medicine for IBD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9527612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95276122022-10-03 A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation Stafford, Imogen S Gosink, Mark M Mossotto, Enrico Ennis, Sarah Hauben, Manfred Inflamm Bowel Dis Basic Science Research BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a gastrointestinal chronic disease with an unpredictable disease course. Computational methods such as machine learning (ML) have the potential to stratify IBD patients for the provision of individualized care. The use of ML methods for IBD was surveyed, with an additional focus on how the field has changed over time. METHODS: On May 6, 2021, a systematic review was conducted through a search of MEDLINE and Embase databases, with the search structure (“machine learning” OR “artificial intelligence”) AND (“Crohn* Disease” OR “Ulcerative Colitis” OR “Inflammatory Bowel Disease”). Exclusion criteria included studies not written in English, no human patient data, publication before 2001, studies that were not peer reviewed, nonautoimmune disease comorbidity research, and record types that were not primary research. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (of 409) records met the inclusion criteria. Random forest methods were most prevalent, and there was an increase in neural networks, mainly applied to imaging data sets. The main applications of ML to clinical tasks were diagnosis (18 of 78), disease course (22 of 78), and disease severity (16 of 78). The median sample size was 263. Clinical and microbiome-related data sets were most popular. Five percent of studies used an external data set after training and testing for additional model validation. DISCUSSION: Availability of longitudinal and deep phenotyping data could lead to better modeling. Machine learning pipelines that consider imbalanced data and that feature selection only on training data will generate more generalizable models. Machine learning models are increasingly being applied to more complex clinical tasks for specific phenotypes, indicating progress towards personalized medicine for IBD. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9527612/ /pubmed/35699597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izac115 Text en © 2022 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Basic Science Research Stafford, Imogen S Gosink, Mark M Mossotto, Enrico Ennis, Sarah Hauben, Manfred A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation |
title | A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation |
title_sort | systematic review of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications to inflammatory bowel disease, with practical guidelines for interpretation |
topic | Basic Science Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izac115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staffordimogens asystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT gosinkmarkm asystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT mossottoenrico asystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT ennissarah asystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT haubenmanfred asystematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT staffordimogens systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT gosinkmarkm systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT mossottoenrico systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT ennissarah systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation AT haubenmanfred systematicreviewofartificialintelligenceandmachinelearningapplicationstoinflammatoryboweldiseasewithpracticalguidelinesforinterpretation |