Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72
The food enzyme urease (urea amidohydrolase EC 3.5.1.5) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 by Nagase (Europa) GmbH. The food enzyme is intended to be used in brewing processes for the production of Japanese sake. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7576 |
_version_ | 1784801119329845248 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme urease (urea amidohydrolase EC 3.5.1.5) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 by Nagase (Europa) GmbH. The food enzyme is intended to be used in brewing processes for the production of Japanese sake. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.009 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The production strain of the food enzyme fulfils the requirements for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach to safety assessment. As no other concerns arising from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considered that toxicological tests were not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel notes that the food enzyme contains a known allergen. Therefore, allergenicity cannot be excluded. Based on the data provided, the Panel concludes that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use, except for individuals sensitised to the identified allergen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9527648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95276482022-10-06 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme urease (urea amidohydrolase EC 3.5.1.5) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 by Nagase (Europa) GmbH. The food enzyme is intended to be used in brewing processes for the production of Japanese sake. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.009 mg TOS/kg body weight per day in European populations. The production strain of the food enzyme fulfils the requirements for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach to safety assessment. As no other concerns arising from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considered that toxicological tests were not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel notes that the food enzyme contains a known allergen. Therefore, allergenicity cannot be excluded. Based on the data provided, the Panel concludes that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use, except for individuals sensitised to the identified allergen. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9527648/ /pubmed/36212675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7576 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Herman, Lieve Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified Limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme urease from the non‐genetically modified limosilactobacillus reuteri strain 48/72 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT dipiazzagiulio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeureasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedlimosilactobacillusreuteristrain4872 |