Cargando…

ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method

PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the effect of different doses of intravenous lidocaine on the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of propofol-induction dose and identify the optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing first-trimester uterine aspiration were scree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jingwen, Kong, Linglingli, Ni, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199630
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S382412
_version_ 1784801131461869568
author Zhang, Jingwen
Kong, Linglingli
Ni, Juan
author_facet Zhang, Jingwen
Kong, Linglingli
Ni, Juan
author_sort Zhang, Jingwen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the effect of different doses of intravenous lidocaine on the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of propofol-induction dose and identify the optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing first-trimester uterine aspiration were screened and randomly enrolled into the following groups: saline (L(0)), 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (L(0.5)), 1.0 mg/kg lidocaine (L(1.0)), and 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine (L(1.5)). Anesthesia was induced with 1.0 µg/kg fentanyl. Prepared lidocaine or saline solution was injected later according to allocation, followed by propofol. The dose of propofol for each patient was determined using the up-and-down sequential study design. The primary end point was the ED50 and ED95 of the propofol-induction dose. The total propofol doses, awakening time, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The ED50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol was significantly lower in groups L(1.0) and L(1.5) than group L(0) (1.6 [1.5–1.7] mg/kg and 1.8 [1.6–1.9] mg/kg, versus 2.4 [2.3–2.5] mg/kg, respectively; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in ED50 between groups L(1.0) and L(1.5) (p>0.05). However, surprisingly, the ED50 was significantly higher in group L(0.5) than L(0) (2.8 [2.6–3.0] mg/kg vs 2.4 [2.3–2.5] mg/kg; p<0.05). The total doses of propofol in groups L(1.0) and L(1.5) were lower than those in groups L(0) and L(0.5) (p<0.05). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline after anesthesia induction in group L(0.5) was greater than that in group L(0) (p<0.01). The incidence of respiratory depression in group L(0.5) was greater than that in groups L(0) and L(1.0) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients who underwent first-trimester uterine aspiration, intravenous lidocaine 1.0 mg/kg prior to propofol injection significantly reduced the ED50 of propofol induction dose without severe side effects, equivalent to the effect of 1.5 mg/kg dose. We recommend 1.0 mg/kg as the optimal dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9527702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95277022022-10-04 ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method Zhang, Jingwen Kong, Linglingli Ni, Juan Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the effect of different doses of intravenous lidocaine on the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of propofol-induction dose and identify the optimal dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing first-trimester uterine aspiration were screened and randomly enrolled into the following groups: saline (L(0)), 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (L(0.5)), 1.0 mg/kg lidocaine (L(1.0)), and 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine (L(1.5)). Anesthesia was induced with 1.0 µg/kg fentanyl. Prepared lidocaine or saline solution was injected later according to allocation, followed by propofol. The dose of propofol for each patient was determined using the up-and-down sequential study design. The primary end point was the ED50 and ED95 of the propofol-induction dose. The total propofol doses, awakening time, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The ED50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol was significantly lower in groups L(1.0) and L(1.5) than group L(0) (1.6 [1.5–1.7] mg/kg and 1.8 [1.6–1.9] mg/kg, versus 2.4 [2.3–2.5] mg/kg, respectively; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in ED50 between groups L(1.0) and L(1.5) (p>0.05). However, surprisingly, the ED50 was significantly higher in group L(0.5) than L(0) (2.8 [2.6–3.0] mg/kg vs 2.4 [2.3–2.5] mg/kg; p<0.05). The total doses of propofol in groups L(1.0) and L(1.5) were lower than those in groups L(0) and L(0.5) (p<0.05). The systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline after anesthesia induction in group L(0.5) was greater than that in group L(0) (p<0.01). The incidence of respiratory depression in group L(0.5) was greater than that in groups L(0) and L(1.0) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients who underwent first-trimester uterine aspiration, intravenous lidocaine 1.0 mg/kg prior to propofol injection significantly reduced the ED50 of propofol induction dose without severe side effects, equivalent to the effect of 1.5 mg/kg dose. We recommend 1.0 mg/kg as the optimal dose. Dove 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9527702/ /pubmed/36199630 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S382412 Text en © 2022 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Jingwen
Kong, Linglingli
Ni, Juan
ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method
title ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method
title_full ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method
title_fullStr ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method
title_full_unstemmed ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method
title_short ED50 and ED95 of Propofol Combined with Different Doses of Intravenous Lidocaine for First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study Using Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Method
title_sort ed50 and ed95 of propofol combined with different doses of intravenous lidocaine for first-trimester uterine aspiration: a prospective dose-finding study using up-and-down sequential allocation method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199630
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S382412
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjingwen ed50anded95ofpropofolcombinedwithdifferentdosesofintravenouslidocaineforfirsttrimesteruterineaspirationaprospectivedosefindingstudyusingupanddownsequentialallocationmethod
AT konglinglingli ed50anded95ofpropofolcombinedwithdifferentdosesofintravenouslidocaineforfirsttrimesteruterineaspirationaprospectivedosefindingstudyusingupanddownsequentialallocationmethod
AT nijuan ed50anded95ofpropofolcombinedwithdifferentdosesofintravenouslidocaineforfirsttrimesteruterineaspirationaprospectivedosefindingstudyusingupanddownsequentialallocationmethod