Cargando…

Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit

OBJECTIVE: This is a prospective observational cohort study with the objective of assessing adherence to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines regarding the first prenatal visit and determining what patient and provider factors are associated with high adherence in a fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christopher, Diane, Markese, Amy, Tonick, Shawna, Carpenter, Lauren, Harrison, Margo S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455057221122590
_version_ 1784801196737822720
author Christopher, Diane
Markese, Amy
Tonick, Shawna
Carpenter, Lauren
Harrison, Margo S
author_facet Christopher, Diane
Markese, Amy
Tonick, Shawna
Carpenter, Lauren
Harrison, Margo S
author_sort Christopher, Diane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This is a prospective observational cohort study with the objective of assessing adherence to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines regarding the first prenatal visit and determining what patient and provider factors are associated with high adherence in a faculty obstetric clinic at an academic medical center. METHODS: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend addressing 72 topics early in prenatal care. A research assistant observed the first prenatal encounter and noted which topics were discussed during the visit. Patient and clinic characteristics were also collected. The primary outcome was the percentage of topics covered at each visit. After analyzing all encounters, patient encounters that scored above the median score were compared with encounters scoring below the median using bivariate comparisons with respect to patient and clinic characteristics. A multivariable Poisson regression model with robust error variance was performed on characteristics with a p value of ⩽0.2. RESULTS: Fifty-one patient encounters met inclusion criteria and the median score for topics covered was 74%. Patients with chronic disease were more likely to have a higher percentage of topics covered (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–3.09). Patients who completed a prenatal questionnaire were also more likely to have a higher percentage (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.00–5.15) as well as patients who had nurse-led education integrated into their visit during (odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.19–2.78). Patient satisfaction had no correlation with the number of topics covered. CONCLUSION: The number of topics to cover at the first prenatal visit has expanded creating challenges for patients and providers. Integration of prenatal questionnaires and nurse-led education has the potential to address gaps in antenatal care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9527982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95279822022-10-04 Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit Christopher, Diane Markese, Amy Tonick, Shawna Carpenter, Lauren Harrison, Margo S Womens Health (Lond) Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: This is a prospective observational cohort study with the objective of assessing adherence to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines regarding the first prenatal visit and determining what patient and provider factors are associated with high adherence in a faculty obstetric clinic at an academic medical center. METHODS: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend addressing 72 topics early in prenatal care. A research assistant observed the first prenatal encounter and noted which topics were discussed during the visit. Patient and clinic characteristics were also collected. The primary outcome was the percentage of topics covered at each visit. After analyzing all encounters, patient encounters that scored above the median score were compared with encounters scoring below the median using bivariate comparisons with respect to patient and clinic characteristics. A multivariable Poisson regression model with robust error variance was performed on characteristics with a p value of ⩽0.2. RESULTS: Fifty-one patient encounters met inclusion criteria and the median score for topics covered was 74%. Patients with chronic disease were more likely to have a higher percentage of topics covered (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–3.09). Patients who completed a prenatal questionnaire were also more likely to have a higher percentage (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.00–5.15) as well as patients who had nurse-led education integrated into their visit during (odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.19–2.78). Patient satisfaction had no correlation with the number of topics covered. CONCLUSION: The number of topics to cover at the first prenatal visit has expanded creating challenges for patients and providers. Integration of prenatal questionnaires and nurse-led education has the potential to address gaps in antenatal care. SAGE Publications 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9527982/ /pubmed/36173253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455057221122590 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Christopher, Diane
Markese, Amy
Tonick, Shawna
Carpenter, Lauren
Harrison, Margo S
Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
title Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
title_full Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
title_fullStr Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
title_short Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
title_sort evaluating adherence to american college of obstetricians and gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9527982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36173253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455057221122590
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherdiane evaluatingadherencetoamericancollegeofobstetriciansandgynecologistsguidelinesatthefirstobstetricvisit
AT markeseamy evaluatingadherencetoamericancollegeofobstetriciansandgynecologistsguidelinesatthefirstobstetricvisit
AT tonickshawna evaluatingadherencetoamericancollegeofobstetriciansandgynecologistsguidelinesatthefirstobstetricvisit
AT carpenterlauren evaluatingadherencetoamericancollegeofobstetriciansandgynecologistsguidelinesatthefirstobstetricvisit
AT harrisonmargos evaluatingadherencetoamericancollegeofobstetriciansandgynecologistsguidelinesatthefirstobstetricvisit