Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform Fixation
BACKGROUND: The modified Lapidus procedure (first metatarso-cuneiform fusion) is a powerful technique for correcting triplanar deformity in hallux valgus. Although traditionally fixed with cross-screws (CS), growing awareness of intercuneiform stability and pronation deformity has led to fixation us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221127001 |
_version_ | 1784801201918836736 |
---|---|
author | An, Tonya W. Fuller, Robert Rajan, Lavan Cororaton, Agnes Conti, Matthew S. Deland, Jonathan T. Ellis, Scott J. |
author_facet | An, Tonya W. Fuller, Robert Rajan, Lavan Cororaton, Agnes Conti, Matthew S. Deland, Jonathan T. Ellis, Scott J. |
author_sort | An, Tonya W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The modified Lapidus procedure (first metatarso-cuneiform fusion) is a powerful technique for correcting triplanar deformity in hallux valgus. Although traditionally fixed with cross-screws (CS), growing awareness of intercuneiform stability and pronation deformity has led to fixation using a plate and first metatarsal–second cuneiform (1MT-2C) screw fixation (PS). We investigated Lapidus patient cohorts using CS vs PS fixation to understand patient-reported outcomes, angular and rotational correction, and complication rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of modified Lapidus for hallux valgus by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into CS or PS groups according to fixation. All patients had preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and minimum 12 months of follow-up. PROMIS scores in 6 key domains were compared within and between groups. Radiographic assessment of hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle were performed on pre- and postoperative XR. Pronation of the first ray was measured on pre- and postoperative weightbearing computed tomography. RESULTS: We compared 42 patients with PS fixation to 43 with CS fixation. Both groups had significant improvement in hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle (P < .001), with no difference between groups. PS patients experienced a greater correction of first metatarsal pronation, an average reduction of 11 degrees, compared to 8 degrees in the CS group (P < .039). Both cohorts experienced improvement in PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical function. There were no differences in PROMIS score improvements between the cohorts. The CS group started weightbearing at 6 weeks vs 3.6 weeks for the PS group. Complication and revision rates were similar. CONCLUSION: A plate and 1MT-2C screw fixation provides safe, robust fixation of Lapidus procedure and prevents instability through the intercuneiform joint. We observed similar improvement in PROMIS compared with patients treated with cross-screws. Complications did not increase despite the PS group weightbearing much earlier. PS patients achieved greater first ray rotational correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9528004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95280042022-10-04 Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform Fixation An, Tonya W. Fuller, Robert Rajan, Lavan Cororaton, Agnes Conti, Matthew S. Deland, Jonathan T. Ellis, Scott J. Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: The modified Lapidus procedure (first metatarso-cuneiform fusion) is a powerful technique for correcting triplanar deformity in hallux valgus. Although traditionally fixed with cross-screws (CS), growing awareness of intercuneiform stability and pronation deformity has led to fixation using a plate and first metatarsal–second cuneiform (1MT-2C) screw fixation (PS). We investigated Lapidus patient cohorts using CS vs PS fixation to understand patient-reported outcomes, angular and rotational correction, and complication rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of modified Lapidus for hallux valgus by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into CS or PS groups according to fixation. All patients had preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and minimum 12 months of follow-up. PROMIS scores in 6 key domains were compared within and between groups. Radiographic assessment of hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle were performed on pre- and postoperative XR. Pronation of the first ray was measured on pre- and postoperative weightbearing computed tomography. RESULTS: We compared 42 patients with PS fixation to 43 with CS fixation. Both groups had significant improvement in hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle (P < .001), with no difference between groups. PS patients experienced a greater correction of first metatarsal pronation, an average reduction of 11 degrees, compared to 8 degrees in the CS group (P < .039). Both cohorts experienced improvement in PROMIS physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical function. There were no differences in PROMIS score improvements between the cohorts. The CS group started weightbearing at 6 weeks vs 3.6 weeks for the PS group. Complication and revision rates were similar. CONCLUSION: A plate and 1MT-2C screw fixation provides safe, robust fixation of Lapidus procedure and prevents instability through the intercuneiform joint. We observed similar improvement in PROMIS compared with patients treated with cross-screws. Complications did not increase despite the PS group weightbearing much earlier. PS patients achieved greater first ray rotational correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study. SAGE Publications 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9528004/ /pubmed/36199381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221127001 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article An, Tonya W. Fuller, Robert Rajan, Lavan Cororaton, Agnes Conti, Matthew S. Deland, Jonathan T. Ellis, Scott J. Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform Fixation |
title | Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First
Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform
Fixation |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First
Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform
Fixation |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First
Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform
Fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First
Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform
Fixation |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Correction of First
Metatarso-Cuneiform Fusion With First Metatarsal to Second Cuneiform
Fixation |
title_sort | clinical outcomes and rotational correction of first
metatarso-cuneiform fusion with first metatarsal to second cuneiform
fixation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114221127001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonyaw clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation AT fullerrobert clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation AT rajanlavan clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation AT cororatonagnes clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation AT contimatthews clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation AT delandjonathant clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation AT ellisscottj clinicaloutcomesandrotationalcorrectionoffirstmetatarsocuneiformfusionwithfirstmetatarsaltosecondcuneiformfixation |