Cargando…

Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND: Radiographic changes in the glenohumeral joint often occur after rotator cuff repair; however, the details of the progression and underlying causes remain unknown. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the timing and frequency of radiographic changes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furuhata, Ryogo, Matsumura, Noboru, Matsuo, Tomoki, Kimura, Hiroo, Suzuki, Taku, Nakamura, Masaya, Iwamoto, Takuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221126095
_version_ 1784801209279840256
author Furuhata, Ryogo
Matsumura, Noboru
Matsuo, Tomoki
Kimura, Hiroo
Suzuki, Taku
Nakamura, Masaya
Iwamoto, Takuji
author_facet Furuhata, Ryogo
Matsumura, Noboru
Matsuo, Tomoki
Kimura, Hiroo
Suzuki, Taku
Nakamura, Masaya
Iwamoto, Takuji
author_sort Furuhata, Ryogo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiographic changes in the glenohumeral joint often occur after rotator cuff repair; however, the details of the progression and underlying causes remain unknown. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the timing and frequency of radiographic changes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to clarify the predictive factors that affect the onset of such changes using multivariate analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with 5 years of follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and evaluated the postoperative shift in radiographic findings on plain radiographs every year during follow-up. Factors related to osteoarthritis, acromial spur re-formation, and greater tuberosity resorption at 5 years after surgery were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Explanatory variables included preoperative factors, intraoperative factors, and postoperative retear. Baseline variables significant in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate models. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 12 developed osteoarthritis, 26 developed acromial spur formation, and 16 developed greater tuberosity resorption at 5 years after surgery. The incidence and grade of osteoarthritis and acromial spur gradually increased over time postoperatively. On the other hand, greater tuberosity resorption developed within 2 years after surgery but did not progress later. Multivariate analysis showed that a larger anteroposterior tear size (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P = .037) was a risk factor for postoperative osteoarthritis. Early retear (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 1.03-102.40; P = .047) was a risk factor for acromial spur re-formation. Roughness of the greater tuberosity (OR, 9.07; 95% CI, 1.13-72.82; P = .038) and larger number of suture anchors (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.66-6.74; P = .001) were risk factors for greater tuberosity resorption. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that radiographic changes occurred in 40% of patients within 5 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. While the osteoarthritic changes and acromial spur re-formation gradually progressed postoperatively, the greater tuberosity resorption stopped within 2 years after surgery. Tear size, morphology of the greater tuberosity, and the number of suture anchors can affect radiographic changes. Furthermore, this study suggested that acromial spur re-formation may be an indicator of early retears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9528035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95280352022-10-04 Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Furuhata, Ryogo Matsumura, Noboru Matsuo, Tomoki Kimura, Hiroo Suzuki, Taku Nakamura, Masaya Iwamoto, Takuji Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Radiographic changes in the glenohumeral joint often occur after rotator cuff repair; however, the details of the progression and underlying causes remain unknown. PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the timing and frequency of radiographic changes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to clarify the predictive factors that affect the onset of such changes using multivariate analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with 5 years of follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and evaluated the postoperative shift in radiographic findings on plain radiographs every year during follow-up. Factors related to osteoarthritis, acromial spur re-formation, and greater tuberosity resorption at 5 years after surgery were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Explanatory variables included preoperative factors, intraoperative factors, and postoperative retear. Baseline variables significant in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate models. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 12 developed osteoarthritis, 26 developed acromial spur formation, and 16 developed greater tuberosity resorption at 5 years after surgery. The incidence and grade of osteoarthritis and acromial spur gradually increased over time postoperatively. On the other hand, greater tuberosity resorption developed within 2 years after surgery but did not progress later. Multivariate analysis showed that a larger anteroposterior tear size (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P = .037) was a risk factor for postoperative osteoarthritis. Early retear (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 1.03-102.40; P = .047) was a risk factor for acromial spur re-formation. Roughness of the greater tuberosity (OR, 9.07; 95% CI, 1.13-72.82; P = .038) and larger number of suture anchors (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.66-6.74; P = .001) were risk factors for greater tuberosity resorption. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that radiographic changes occurred in 40% of patients within 5 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. While the osteoarthritic changes and acromial spur re-formation gradually progressed postoperatively, the greater tuberosity resorption stopped within 2 years after surgery. Tear size, morphology of the greater tuberosity, and the number of suture anchors can affect radiographic changes. Furthermore, this study suggested that acromial spur re-formation may be an indicator of early retears. SAGE Publications 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9528035/ /pubmed/36199829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221126095 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Furuhata, Ryogo
Matsumura, Noboru
Matsuo, Tomoki
Kimura, Hiroo
Suzuki, Taku
Nakamura, Masaya
Iwamoto, Takuji
Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
title Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
title_full Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
title_fullStr Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
title_short Evaluation of Radiographic Changes 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
title_sort evaluation of radiographic changes 5 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221126095
work_keys_str_mv AT furuhataryogo evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT matsumuranoboru evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT matsuotomoki evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT kimurahiroo evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT suzukitaku evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT nakamuramasaya evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT iwamototakuji evaluationofradiographicchanges5yearsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair