Cargando…
Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations
INTRODUCTION: There is a significant growth in the use of digital technology and methods in health-related research, further driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has offered a potential to apply digital health research in hidden, marginalised and excluded populations who are traditionally not easil...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061361 |
_version_ | 1784801328414851072 |
---|---|
author | Belt, Rachel Victoria Rahimi, Kazem Cai, Samuel |
author_facet | Belt, Rachel Victoria Rahimi, Kazem Cai, Samuel |
author_sort | Belt, Rachel Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is a significant growth in the use of digital technology and methods in health-related research, further driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has offered a potential to apply digital health research in hidden, marginalised and excluded populations who are traditionally not easily reached due to economic, societal and legal barriers. To better inform future digital health studies of these vulnerable populations, we proposed a scoping review to comprehensively map published evidence and guidelines on the applications and challenges of digital health research methods to hard-to-reach communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Arksey and O’ Malley methodological framework for scoping reviews. The framework for the review will employ updated methods developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute including the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Scoping Review checklist. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Google Scholar and Greenfile are the identified databases for peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative studies in-scope of the review. Grey literature focused on guidance and best practice in digital health research, and hard-to-reach populations will also be searched following published protocols. The review will focus on literature published between 1 February 2012 and 1 February 2022. Two reviewers are engaged in the review. After screening the title and abstract to determine the eligibility of each article, a thorough full-text review of eligible articles will be conducted using a data extraction framework. Key extracted information will be mapped in tabular and visualised summaries to categorise the breadth of literature and identify key digital methods, including their limitations and potential, for use in hard-to-reach populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review does not require ethical approval. The results of the scoping review will consist of peer-reviewed publications, presentations and knowledge mobilisation activities including a lay summary posted via social media channels and production of a policy brief. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9528575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95285752022-10-04 Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations Belt, Rachel Victoria Rahimi, Kazem Cai, Samuel BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: There is a significant growth in the use of digital technology and methods in health-related research, further driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has offered a potential to apply digital health research in hidden, marginalised and excluded populations who are traditionally not easily reached due to economic, societal and legal barriers. To better inform future digital health studies of these vulnerable populations, we proposed a scoping review to comprehensively map published evidence and guidelines on the applications and challenges of digital health research methods to hard-to-reach communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Arksey and O’ Malley methodological framework for scoping reviews. The framework for the review will employ updated methods developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute including the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Scoping Review checklist. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Google Scholar and Greenfile are the identified databases for peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative studies in-scope of the review. Grey literature focused on guidance and best practice in digital health research, and hard-to-reach populations will also be searched following published protocols. The review will focus on literature published between 1 February 2012 and 1 February 2022. Two reviewers are engaged in the review. After screening the title and abstract to determine the eligibility of each article, a thorough full-text review of eligible articles will be conducted using a data extraction framework. Key extracted information will be mapped in tabular and visualised summaries to categorise the breadth of literature and identify key digital methods, including their limitations and potential, for use in hard-to-reach populations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review does not require ethical approval. The results of the scoping review will consist of peer-reviewed publications, presentations and knowledge mobilisation activities including a lay summary posted via social media channels and production of a policy brief. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9528575/ /pubmed/36171043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061361 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Global Health Belt, Rachel Victoria Rahimi, Kazem Cai, Samuel Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
title | Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
title_full | Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
title_fullStr | Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
title_short | Researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
title_sort | researching the hard-to-reach: a scoping review protocol of digital health research in hidden, marginal and excluded populations |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beltrachelvictoria researchingthehardtoreachascopingreviewprotocolofdigitalhealthresearchinhiddenmarginalandexcludedpopulations AT rahimikazem researchingthehardtoreachascopingreviewprotocolofdigitalhealthresearchinhiddenmarginalandexcludedpopulations AT caisamuel researchingthehardtoreachascopingreviewprotocolofdigitalhealthresearchinhiddenmarginalandexcludedpopulations |