Cargando…
Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness
AIM: To determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness. METHODS: We included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001061 |
Sumario: | AIM: To determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness. METHODS: We included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral domain-optical coherence tomography scans. mRNFL and GC-IPL thicknesses were determined for groups from different self-reported ethnic backgrounds. Multivariable regression models adjusting for covariables including age, gender, ethnicity and refractive error were built, with and without adjusting for total retinal thickness. RESULTS: 20237 participants were analysed. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was on average 0.9 μm (−1.2, –0.6; p<0.001) lower among Asians and 1.5 μm (−2.3, –0.6; p<0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, the average GC-IPL thickness was 1.9 μm (−2.5, –1.4; p<0.001) lower among Asians compared with white participants, and 2.4 μm (−3.9, –1.0; p=0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. After accounting for total retinal thickness, the layer thicknesses were not significantly different among ethnic groups. When considered as a proportion of total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was ~0.1 and GC-IPL thickness was ~0.2 across age, gender and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported ethnic differences in layer thickness among groups are likely driven by differences in total retinal thickness. Our results suggest using layer thickness ratio (retinal layer thicknesses/total retinal thickness) rather than absolute thickness values when comparing retinal layer thicknesses across groups. |
---|