Cargando…
Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness
AIM: To determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness. METHODS: We included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001061 |
_version_ | 1784801346961014784 |
---|---|
author | Banghart, Mark Lee, Kyungmoo Bahrainian, Mozhdeh Staggers, Kristen Amos, Christopher Liu, Yao Domalpally, Amitha Frankfort, Benjamin J Sohn, Elliott H Abramoff, Michael Channa, Roomasa |
author_facet | Banghart, Mark Lee, Kyungmoo Bahrainian, Mozhdeh Staggers, Kristen Amos, Christopher Liu, Yao Domalpally, Amitha Frankfort, Benjamin J Sohn, Elliott H Abramoff, Michael Channa, Roomasa |
author_sort | Banghart, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness. METHODS: We included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral domain-optical coherence tomography scans. mRNFL and GC-IPL thicknesses were determined for groups from different self-reported ethnic backgrounds. Multivariable regression models adjusting for covariables including age, gender, ethnicity and refractive error were built, with and without adjusting for total retinal thickness. RESULTS: 20237 participants were analysed. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was on average 0.9 μm (−1.2, –0.6; p<0.001) lower among Asians and 1.5 μm (−2.3, –0.6; p<0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, the average GC-IPL thickness was 1.9 μm (−2.5, –1.4; p<0.001) lower among Asians compared with white participants, and 2.4 μm (−3.9, –1.0; p=0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. After accounting for total retinal thickness, the layer thicknesses were not significantly different among ethnic groups. When considered as a proportion of total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was ~0.1 and GC-IPL thickness was ~0.2 across age, gender and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported ethnic differences in layer thickness among groups are likely driven by differences in total retinal thickness. Our results suggest using layer thickness ratio (retinal layer thicknesses/total retinal thickness) rather than absolute thickness values when comparing retinal layer thicknesses across groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9528673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95286732022-10-04 Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness Banghart, Mark Lee, Kyungmoo Bahrainian, Mozhdeh Staggers, Kristen Amos, Christopher Liu, Yao Domalpally, Amitha Frankfort, Benjamin J Sohn, Elliott H Abramoff, Michael Channa, Roomasa BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Research AIM: To determine whether macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thicknesses vary by ethnicity after accounting for total retinal thickness. METHODS: We included healthy participants from the UK Biobank cohort who underwent macula-centred spectral domain-optical coherence tomography scans. mRNFL and GC-IPL thicknesses were determined for groups from different self-reported ethnic backgrounds. Multivariable regression models adjusting for covariables including age, gender, ethnicity and refractive error were built, with and without adjusting for total retinal thickness. RESULTS: 20237 participants were analysed. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was on average 0.9 μm (−1.2, –0.6; p<0.001) lower among Asians and 1.5 μm (−2.3, –0.6; p<0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. Prior to accounting for total retinal thickness, the average GC-IPL thickness was 1.9 μm (−2.5, –1.4; p<0.001) lower among Asians compared with white participants, and 2.4 μm (−3.9, –1.0; p=0.001) lower among black participants compared with white participants. After accounting for total retinal thickness, the layer thicknesses were not significantly different among ethnic groups. When considered as a proportion of total retinal thickness, mRNFL thickness was ~0.1 and GC-IPL thickness was ~0.2 across age, gender and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported ethnic differences in layer thickness among groups are likely driven by differences in total retinal thickness. Our results suggest using layer thickness ratio (retinal layer thicknesses/total retinal thickness) rather than absolute thickness values when comparing retinal layer thicknesses across groups. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9528673/ /pubmed/36329022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001061 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Banghart, Mark Lee, Kyungmoo Bahrainian, Mozhdeh Staggers, Kristen Amos, Christopher Liu, Yao Domalpally, Amitha Frankfort, Benjamin J Sohn, Elliott H Abramoff, Michael Channa, Roomasa Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
title | Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
title_full | Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
title_fullStr | Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
title_full_unstemmed | Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
title_short | Total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
title_sort | total retinal thickness: a neglected factor in the evaluation of inner retinal thickness |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banghartmark totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT leekyungmoo totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT bahrainianmozhdeh totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT staggerskristen totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT amoschristopher totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT liuyao totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT domalpallyamitha totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT frankfortbenjaminj totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT sohnelliotth totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT abramoffmichael totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness AT channaroomasa totalretinalthicknessaneglectedfactorintheevaluationofinnerretinalthickness |