Cargando…

National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION: Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Katie, Battersby, Cheryl, Boardman, James P, Boyle, Elaine M, Carroll, William D, Dinwiddy, Kate, Dorling, Jon, Gallagher, Katie, Hardy, Pollyanna, Johnston, Emma, Mactier, Helen, Marcroft, Claire, Webbe, James, Gale, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330
_version_ 1784801348420632576
author Evans, Katie
Battersby, Cheryl
Boardman, James P
Boyle, Elaine M
Carroll, William D
Dinwiddy, Kate
Dorling, Jon
Gallagher, Katie
Hardy, Pollyanna
Johnston, Emma
Mactier, Helen
Marcroft, Claire
Webbe, James
Gale, Chris
author_facet Evans, Katie
Battersby, Cheryl
Boardman, James P
Boyle, Elaine M
Carroll, William D
Dinwiddy, Kate
Dorling, Jon
Gallagher, Katie
Hardy, Pollyanna
Johnston, Emma
Mactier, Helen
Marcroft, Claire
Webbe, James
Gale, Chris
author_sort Evans, Katie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A steering group comprising parents, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers and representatives from key organisations (Neonatal Society, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Nurses Association and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) was identified to oversee this project. We will invite submissions of research questions formatted using the PICO structure from the following stakeholder groups using an online questionnaire: parents, patients, healthcare professionals and academic researchers. Unanswered, non-duplicate research questions will be entered into a three-round eDelphi survey of all stakeholder groups. Research questions will be ranked by mean aggregate scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The final list of prioritised research questions will be disseminated through traditional academic channels, directly to key stakeholder groups through representative organisations and on social media. The outcome of the project will be shared with key research organisations such as the National Institute for Health Research. Research ethics committee approval is not required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9528679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95286792022-10-04 National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine M Carroll, William D Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James Gale, Chris BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A steering group comprising parents, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers and representatives from key organisations (Neonatal Society, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Nurses Association and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) was identified to oversee this project. We will invite submissions of research questions formatted using the PICO structure from the following stakeholder groups using an online questionnaire: parents, patients, healthcare professionals and academic researchers. Unanswered, non-duplicate research questions will be entered into a three-round eDelphi survey of all stakeholder groups. Research questions will be ranked by mean aggregate scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The final list of prioritised research questions will be disseminated through traditional academic channels, directly to key stakeholder groups through representative organisations and on social media. The outcome of the project will be shared with key research organisations such as the National Institute for Health Research. Research ethics committee approval is not required. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9528679/ /pubmed/36171048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Evans, Katie
Battersby, Cheryl
Boardman, James P
Boyle, Elaine M
Carroll, William D
Dinwiddy, Kate
Dorling, Jon
Gallagher, Katie
Hardy, Pollyanna
Johnston, Emma
Mactier, Helen
Marcroft, Claire
Webbe, James
Gale, Chris
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
title National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
title_full National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
title_short National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
title_sort national priority setting partnership using a delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the united kingdom
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330
work_keys_str_mv AT evanskatie nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT battersbycheryl nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT boardmanjamesp nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT boyleelainem nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT carrollwilliamd nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT dinwiddykate nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT dorlingjon nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT gallagherkatie nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT hardypollyanna nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT johnstonemma nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT mactierhelen nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT marcroftclaire nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT webbejames nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom
AT galechris nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom