Cargando…
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom
INTRODUCTION: Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330 |
_version_ | 1784801348420632576 |
---|---|
author | Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine M Carroll, William D Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James Gale, Chris |
author_facet | Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine M Carroll, William D Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James Gale, Chris |
author_sort | Evans, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A steering group comprising parents, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers and representatives from key organisations (Neonatal Society, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Nurses Association and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) was identified to oversee this project. We will invite submissions of research questions formatted using the PICO structure from the following stakeholder groups using an online questionnaire: parents, patients, healthcare professionals and academic researchers. Unanswered, non-duplicate research questions will be entered into a three-round eDelphi survey of all stakeholder groups. Research questions will be ranked by mean aggregate scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The final list of prioritised research questions will be disseminated through traditional academic channels, directly to key stakeholder groups through representative organisations and on social media. The outcome of the project will be shared with key research organisations such as the National Institute for Health Research. Research ethics committee approval is not required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9528679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95286792022-10-04 National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine M Carroll, William D Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James Gale, Chris BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Methodologically robust clinical trials are required to improve neonatal care and reduce unwanted variations in practice. Previous neonatal research prioritisation processes have identified important research themes rather than specific research questions amenable to clinical trials. Practice-changing trials require well-defined research questions, commonly organised using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure. By narrowing the scope of research priorities to those which can be answered in clinical trials and by involving a wide range of different stakeholders, we aim to provide a robust and transparent process to identify and prioritise research questions answerable within the National Healthcare System to inform future practice-changing clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A steering group comprising parents, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers and representatives from key organisations (Neonatal Society, British Association of Perinatal Medicine, Neonatal Nurses Association and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health) was identified to oversee this project. We will invite submissions of research questions formatted using the PICO structure from the following stakeholder groups using an online questionnaire: parents, patients, healthcare professionals and academic researchers. Unanswered, non-duplicate research questions will be entered into a three-round eDelphi survey of all stakeholder groups. Research questions will be ranked by mean aggregate scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The final list of prioritised research questions will be disseminated through traditional academic channels, directly to key stakeholder groups through representative organisations and on social media. The outcome of the project will be shared with key research organisations such as the National Institute for Health Research. Research ethics committee approval is not required. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9528679/ /pubmed/36171048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Paediatrics Evans, Katie Battersby, Cheryl Boardman, James P Boyle, Elaine M Carroll, William D Dinwiddy, Kate Dorling, Jon Gallagher, Katie Hardy, Pollyanna Johnston, Emma Mactier, Helen Marcroft, Claire Webbe, James Gale, Chris National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom |
title | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom |
title_full | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom |
title_short | National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | national priority setting partnership using a delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the united kingdom |
topic | Paediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evanskatie nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT battersbycheryl nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT boardmanjamesp nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT boyleelainem nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT carrollwilliamd nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT dinwiddykate nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT dorlingjon nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT gallagherkatie nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT hardypollyanna nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT johnstonemma nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT mactierhelen nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT marcroftclaire nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT webbejames nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom AT galechris nationalprioritysettingpartnershipusingadelphiconsensusprocesstodevelopneonatalresearchquestionssuitableforpracticechangingrandomisedtrialsintheunitedkingdom |