Cargando…

Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy

INTRODUCTION: To detect the morphological parameters of ovarian masses and the accuracy of the risk of mali-gnancy index (RMI) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 264 women in 3 groups (reproductive, premenopausal, and postmenopausal) presented with ovarian masses and scheduled f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adilgereyeva, Akmaral S., Abdelazim, Ibrahim A., Zhurabekova, Gulmira A., El-Ghazaly, Tamer E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199743
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.116402
_version_ 1784801368267030528
author Adilgereyeva, Akmaral S.
Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
Zhurabekova, Gulmira A.
El-Ghazaly, Tamer E.
author_facet Adilgereyeva, Akmaral S.
Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
Zhurabekova, Gulmira A.
El-Ghazaly, Tamer E.
author_sort Adilgereyeva, Akmaral S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To detect the morphological parameters of ovarian masses and the accuracy of the risk of mali-gnancy index (RMI) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 264 women in 3 groups (reproductive, premenopausal, and postmenopausal) presented with ovarian masses and scheduled for surgery were included in this study. The participants’ preoperative RMI was compared to the postoperative histology (gold standard) to detect the accuracy of RMI in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. RESULTS: The incidence of malignant and benign ovarian tumours in the reproductive group was 9.1% and 90.9%, respectively, while it was 35.2% and 64.8%, respectively, in the premenopausal group, and 35.2%, and 64.8%, respectively, in the postmenopausal group. The incidence of malignant ovarian tumours was significantly higher in the premenopausal (35.2%) and postmenopausal (35.2%) groups compared to the reproductive group (9.1%), (p = 0.0008, and p = 0.0008, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that RMI at cut-off value > 247.5 had 82.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), and 98.1% negative predictive value (NPV) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in the 3 studied groups (AUC 0.955, p < 0.001). There was significant positive correlation between the participants’ age, and RMI (p = 0.001), and between participants’ cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and RMI (p < 0.0001) in the ovarian malignancy group. CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal RMI is an effective tool for primary evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Risk malignancy index at cut-off value > 247.5 had the best performance (82.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, and 98.1% NPV) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in the 3 studied groups. There was significant positive correlation between participants’ age, and RMI, and between participants’ CA-125 and RMI, in the studied malignant ovarian tumours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9528815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95288152022-10-04 Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy Adilgereyeva, Akmaral S. Abdelazim, Ibrahim A. Zhurabekova, Gulmira A. El-Ghazaly, Tamer E. Prz Menopauzalny Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To detect the morphological parameters of ovarian masses and the accuracy of the risk of mali-gnancy index (RMI) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 264 women in 3 groups (reproductive, premenopausal, and postmenopausal) presented with ovarian masses and scheduled for surgery were included in this study. The participants’ preoperative RMI was compared to the postoperative histology (gold standard) to detect the accuracy of RMI in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. RESULTS: The incidence of malignant and benign ovarian tumours in the reproductive group was 9.1% and 90.9%, respectively, while it was 35.2% and 64.8%, respectively, in the premenopausal group, and 35.2%, and 64.8%, respectively, in the postmenopausal group. The incidence of malignant ovarian tumours was significantly higher in the premenopausal (35.2%) and postmenopausal (35.2%) groups compared to the reproductive group (9.1%), (p = 0.0008, and p = 0.0008, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that RMI at cut-off value > 247.5 had 82.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), and 98.1% negative predictive value (NPV) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in the 3 studied groups (AUC 0.955, p < 0.001). There was significant positive correlation between the participants’ age, and RMI (p = 0.001), and between participants’ cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) and RMI (p < 0.0001) in the ovarian malignancy group. CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal RMI is an effective tool for primary evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Risk malignancy index at cut-off value > 247.5 had the best performance (82.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, and 98.1% NPV) in diagnosing ovarian malignancy in the 3 studied groups. There was significant positive correlation between participants’ age, and RMI, and between participants’ CA-125 and RMI, in the studied malignant ovarian tumours. Termedia Publishing House 2022-05-24 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9528815/ /pubmed/36199743 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.116402 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Adilgereyeva, Akmaral S.
Abdelazim, Ibrahim A.
Zhurabekova, Gulmira A.
El-Ghazaly, Tamer E.
Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
title Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
title_full Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
title_fullStr Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
title_full_unstemmed Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
title_short Morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
title_sort morphological parameters of ovarian masses and accuracy of the risk of malignancy index in diagnosing ovarian malignancy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199743
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.116402
work_keys_str_mv AT adilgereyevaakmarals morphologicalparametersofovarianmassesandaccuracyoftheriskofmalignancyindexindiagnosingovarianmalignancy
AT abdelazimibrahima morphologicalparametersofovarianmassesandaccuracyoftheriskofmalignancyindexindiagnosingovarianmalignancy
AT zhurabekovagulmiraa morphologicalparametersofovarianmassesandaccuracyoftheriskofmalignancyindexindiagnosingovarianmalignancy
AT elghazalytamere morphologicalparametersofovarianmassesandaccuracyoftheriskofmalignancyindexindiagnosingovarianmalignancy