Cargando…

Urinary toxicity after salvage re-irradiation for prostate cancer local failure after definitive radiotherapy: a clinical and dosimetric prognostic factors analysis

PURPOSE: Predictors of long-term toxicity after prostate cancer re-irradiation are scarce. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the impact of clinical/dosimetric data on late genitourinary (GU) toxicity on fourteen radio-recurrent prostate cancer patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (RT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dipasquale, Giovanna, Zilli, Thomas, Fiorino, Claudio, Achard, Vérane, Rouzaud, Michel, Miralbell, Raymond
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9528846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199992
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.117124
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Predictors of long-term toxicity after prostate cancer re-irradiation are scarce. In this study, we retrospectively assessed the impact of clinical/dosimetric data on late genitourinary (GU) toxicity on fourteen radio-recurrent prostate cancer patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (RT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: To identify dose parameters and clinical factors potentially associated to severe long-term GU toxicity, study population was stratified in two groups according to toxicity, including one low-grade group (grade ≤ 2, n = 6) and one high-grade group (grade ≥ 3, n = 8). Dose prescription at primary and salvage-RT in 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD(2Gy)) per fraction, treatment techniques, and clinical factors potentially associated to severe GU toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: At salvage-RT, the median EQD(2Gy) α/β = 3 Gy was significantly higher in the high-toxicity group (85 Gy, range, 71-85 Gy) compared to the low-toxicity group (77 Gy, range, 61-85 Gy) (p = 0.01). All patients treated using salvage-RT with a brachytherapy (BT) boost and with a baseline Framingham risk-score of > 20% (n = 8) developed severe GU toxicity, while none of the remaining patients developed a grade 3 or more GU toxicity (p = 0.0003). V(70) > 0 and V(75) > 0 of the primary treatment were associated with an increased rate of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows that the delivery of doses up to 75-80 Gy (EQD(2Gy), α/β = 3 Gy) in salvage-RT can be safe in terms of severe GU toxicity avoidance. Furthermore, concomitant cardiovascular comorbidities seem to increase the risk to develop severe GU toxicity.