Cargando…
Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
Orbital septum plication provides various benefits, including eliminating the necessity for a septal incision and the ability to relocate infraorbital fat in a more anatomically suitable manner. This study aimed to compare the results of traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision and the orb...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004530 |
_version_ | 1784801424378429440 |
---|---|
author | Etman, Adnan Gamal Badawy, Mohamed Samir Setta, Hany Saad Magdy, Amr EL-badawy, Ahmed |
author_facet | Etman, Adnan Gamal Badawy, Mohamed Samir Setta, Hany Saad Magdy, Amr EL-badawy, Ahmed |
author_sort | Etman, Adnan Gamal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Orbital septum plication provides various benefits, including eliminating the necessity for a septal incision and the ability to relocate infraorbital fat in a more anatomically suitable manner. This study aimed to compare the results of traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision and the orbital septal plication method using orbital grey scale analysis as a new objective method for assessment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study on patients with bilateral baggy lower eyelids who underwent traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision or fat-sparing technique using orbital septal plication. All patients were followed up closely for 1 week and then after 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the study’s outcomes. RESULTS: The study was conducted using 40 patients (20 patients per group). The total (medial, central, and lateral) orbital grey scale analysis showed a significant reduction in the fat-sparing and traditional groups (P < 0.001, each). However, the percentage of reduction was significantly higher in the fat-sparing group (34.6 ± 2.9 versus 15.5 ± 3.3 in the traditional groups; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the fat-sparing technique is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes and a lower complication rate than those of the traditional technique with fat excision. Further studies with a longer duration of follow-up and a larger sample size are required to estimate the risk of recurrence and the need for a revision procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9529063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95290632022-10-05 Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis Etman, Adnan Gamal Badawy, Mohamed Samir Setta, Hany Saad Magdy, Amr EL-badawy, Ahmed Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic Orbital septum plication provides various benefits, including eliminating the necessity for a septal incision and the ability to relocate infraorbital fat in a more anatomically suitable manner. This study aimed to compare the results of traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision and the orbital septal plication method using orbital grey scale analysis as a new objective method for assessment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study on patients with bilateral baggy lower eyelids who underwent traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision or fat-sparing technique using orbital septal plication. All patients were followed up closely for 1 week and then after 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the study’s outcomes. RESULTS: The study was conducted using 40 patients (20 patients per group). The total (medial, central, and lateral) orbital grey scale analysis showed a significant reduction in the fat-sparing and traditional groups (P < 0.001, each). However, the percentage of reduction was significantly higher in the fat-sparing group (34.6 ± 2.9 versus 15.5 ± 3.3 in the traditional groups; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the fat-sparing technique is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes and a lower complication rate than those of the traditional technique with fat excision. Further studies with a longer duration of follow-up and a larger sample size are required to estimate the risk of recurrence and the need for a revision procedure. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9529063/ /pubmed/36203736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004530 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Cosmetic Etman, Adnan Gamal Badawy, Mohamed Samir Setta, Hany Saad Magdy, Amr EL-badawy, Ahmed Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis |
title | Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of fat excision versus sparing in lower blepharoplasty using orbital gray scale analysis |
topic | Cosmetic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT etmanadnangamal evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis AT badawymohamedsamir evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis AT settahanysaad evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis AT magdyamr evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis AT elbadawyahmed evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis |