Cargando…

Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis

Orbital septum plication provides various benefits, including eliminating the necessity for a septal incision and the ability to relocate infraorbital fat in a more anatomically suitable manner. This study aimed to compare the results of traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision and the orb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Etman, Adnan Gamal, Badawy, Mohamed Samir, Setta, Hany Saad, Magdy, Amr, EL-badawy, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004530
_version_ 1784801424378429440
author Etman, Adnan Gamal
Badawy, Mohamed Samir
Setta, Hany Saad
Magdy, Amr
EL-badawy, Ahmed
author_facet Etman, Adnan Gamal
Badawy, Mohamed Samir
Setta, Hany Saad
Magdy, Amr
EL-badawy, Ahmed
author_sort Etman, Adnan Gamal
collection PubMed
description Orbital septum plication provides various benefits, including eliminating the necessity for a septal incision and the ability to relocate infraorbital fat in a more anatomically suitable manner. This study aimed to compare the results of traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision and the orbital septal plication method using orbital grey scale analysis as a new objective method for assessment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study on patients with bilateral baggy lower eyelids who underwent traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision or fat-sparing technique using orbital septal plication. All patients were followed up closely for 1 week and then after 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the study’s outcomes. RESULTS: The study was conducted using 40 patients (20 patients per group). The total (medial, central, and lateral) orbital grey scale analysis showed a significant reduction in the fat-sparing and traditional groups (P < 0.001, each). However, the percentage of reduction was significantly higher in the fat-sparing group (34.6 ± 2.9 versus 15.5 ± 3.3 in the traditional groups; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the fat-sparing technique is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes and a lower complication rate than those of the traditional technique with fat excision. Further studies with a longer duration of follow-up and a larger sample size are required to estimate the risk of recurrence and the need for a revision procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95290632022-10-05 Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis Etman, Adnan Gamal Badawy, Mohamed Samir Setta, Hany Saad Magdy, Amr EL-badawy, Ahmed Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic Orbital septum plication provides various benefits, including eliminating the necessity for a septal incision and the ability to relocate infraorbital fat in a more anatomically suitable manner. This study aimed to compare the results of traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision and the orbital septal plication method using orbital grey scale analysis as a new objective method for assessment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study on patients with bilateral baggy lower eyelids who underwent traditional lower blepharoplasty with fat excision or fat-sparing technique using orbital septal plication. All patients were followed up closely for 1 week and then after 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the study’s outcomes. RESULTS: The study was conducted using 40 patients (20 patients per group). The total (medial, central, and lateral) orbital grey scale analysis showed a significant reduction in the fat-sparing and traditional groups (P < 0.001, each). However, the percentage of reduction was significantly higher in the fat-sparing group (34.6 ± 2.9 versus 15.5 ± 3.3 in the traditional groups; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the fat-sparing technique is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes and a lower complication rate than those of the traditional technique with fat excision. Further studies with a longer duration of follow-up and a larger sample size are required to estimate the risk of recurrence and the need for a revision procedure. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9529063/ /pubmed/36203736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004530 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Etman, Adnan Gamal
Badawy, Mohamed Samir
Setta, Hany Saad
Magdy, Amr
EL-badawy, Ahmed
Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
title Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
title_full Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
title_short Evaluation of Fat Excision versus Sparing in Lower Blepharoplasty Using Orbital Gray Scale Analysis
title_sort evaluation of fat excision versus sparing in lower blepharoplasty using orbital gray scale analysis
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004530
work_keys_str_mv AT etmanadnangamal evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis
AT badawymohamedsamir evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis
AT settahanysaad evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis
AT magdyamr evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis
AT elbadawyahmed evaluationoffatexcisionversussparinginlowerblepharoplastyusingorbitalgrayscaleanalysis