Cargando…

Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Simulation modeling methods are an increasingly common tool for projecting the potential health effects of policies to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. However, it remains unknown which SSB policies are understudied and how simulation modeling methods could be improved....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Natalie Riva, Grummon, Anna H., Ng, Shu Wen, Wright, Sarah Towner, Frerichs, Leah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36191026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275270
_version_ 1784801430212706304
author Smith, Natalie Riva
Grummon, Anna H.
Ng, Shu Wen
Wright, Sarah Towner
Frerichs, Leah
author_facet Smith, Natalie Riva
Grummon, Anna H.
Ng, Shu Wen
Wright, Sarah Towner
Frerichs, Leah
author_sort Smith, Natalie Riva
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Simulation modeling methods are an increasingly common tool for projecting the potential health effects of policies to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. However, it remains unknown which SSB policies are understudied and how simulation modeling methods could be improved. To inform next steps, we conducted a scoping review to characterize the (1) policies considered and (2) major characteristics of SSB simulation models. METHODS: We systematically searched 7 electronic databases in 2020, updated in 2021. Two investigators independently screened articles to identify peer-reviewed research using simulation modeling to project the impact of SSB policies on health outcomes. One investigator extracted information about policies considered and key characteristics of models from the full text of included articles. Data were analyzed in 2021–22. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles were included. Of these, 50 simulated at least one tax policy, most often an ad valorem tax (e.g., 20% tax, n = 25) or volumetric tax (e.g., 1 cent-per-fluid-ounce tax, n = 23). Non-tax policies examined included bans on SSB purchases (n = 5), mandatory reformulation (n = 3), warning labels (n = 2), and portion size policies (n = 2). Policies were typically modeled in populations accounting for age and gender or sex attributes. Most studies focused on weight-related outcomes (n = 54), used cohort, lifetable, or microsimulation modeling methods (n = 34), conducted sensitivity or uncertainty analyses (n = 56), and included supplementary materials (n = 54). Few studies included stakeholders at any point in their process (n = 9) or provided replication code/data (n = 8). DISCUSSION: Most simulation modeling of SSB policies has focused on tax policies and has been limited in its exploration of heterogenous impacts across population groups. Future research would benefit from refined policy and implementation scenario specifications, thorough assessments of the equity impacts of policies using established methods, and standardized reporting to improve transparency and consistency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95291012022-10-04 Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review Smith, Natalie Riva Grummon, Anna H. Ng, Shu Wen Wright, Sarah Towner Frerichs, Leah PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Simulation modeling methods are an increasingly common tool for projecting the potential health effects of policies to decrease sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake. However, it remains unknown which SSB policies are understudied and how simulation modeling methods could be improved. To inform next steps, we conducted a scoping review to characterize the (1) policies considered and (2) major characteristics of SSB simulation models. METHODS: We systematically searched 7 electronic databases in 2020, updated in 2021. Two investigators independently screened articles to identify peer-reviewed research using simulation modeling to project the impact of SSB policies on health outcomes. One investigator extracted information about policies considered and key characteristics of models from the full text of included articles. Data were analyzed in 2021–22. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles were included. Of these, 50 simulated at least one tax policy, most often an ad valorem tax (e.g., 20% tax, n = 25) or volumetric tax (e.g., 1 cent-per-fluid-ounce tax, n = 23). Non-tax policies examined included bans on SSB purchases (n = 5), mandatory reformulation (n = 3), warning labels (n = 2), and portion size policies (n = 2). Policies were typically modeled in populations accounting for age and gender or sex attributes. Most studies focused on weight-related outcomes (n = 54), used cohort, lifetable, or microsimulation modeling methods (n = 34), conducted sensitivity or uncertainty analyses (n = 56), and included supplementary materials (n = 54). Few studies included stakeholders at any point in their process (n = 9) or provided replication code/data (n = 8). DISCUSSION: Most simulation modeling of SSB policies has focused on tax policies and has been limited in its exploration of heterogenous impacts across population groups. Future research would benefit from refined policy and implementation scenario specifications, thorough assessments of the equity impacts of policies using established methods, and standardized reporting to improve transparency and consistency. Public Library of Science 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9529101/ /pubmed/36191026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275270 Text en © 2022 Smith et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Natalie Riva
Grummon, Anna H.
Ng, Shu Wen
Wright, Sarah Towner
Frerichs, Leah
Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review
title Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review
title_full Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review
title_fullStr Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review
title_short Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review
title_sort simulation models of sugary drink policies: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36191026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275270
work_keys_str_mv AT smithnatalieriva simulationmodelsofsugarydrinkpoliciesascopingreview
AT grummonannah simulationmodelsofsugarydrinkpoliciesascopingreview
AT ngshuwen simulationmodelsofsugarydrinkpoliciesascopingreview
AT wrightsarahtowner simulationmodelsofsugarydrinkpoliciesascopingreview
AT frerichsleah simulationmodelsofsugarydrinkpoliciesascopingreview