Cargando…

A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings

A narrative systematic literature review was conducted to explore resilient performance in defence and security settings. A search strategy was employed across a total of five databases, searching published articles from 2001 onwards that assessed performance and optimal function in relation to resi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Marc Vincent, Smith, Nathan, Burns, Danielle, Braithwaite, Elizabeth, Turner, Martin, McCann, Andy, Walker, Lucy, Emmerson, Paul, Webster, Leonie, Jones, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36190945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273015
_version_ 1784801431698538496
author Jones, Marc Vincent
Smith, Nathan
Burns, Danielle
Braithwaite, Elizabeth
Turner, Martin
McCann, Andy
Walker, Lucy
Emmerson, Paul
Webster, Leonie
Jones, Martin
author_facet Jones, Marc Vincent
Smith, Nathan
Burns, Danielle
Braithwaite, Elizabeth
Turner, Martin
McCann, Andy
Walker, Lucy
Emmerson, Paul
Webster, Leonie
Jones, Martin
author_sort Jones, Marc Vincent
collection PubMed
description A narrative systematic literature review was conducted to explore resilient performance in defence and security settings. A search strategy was employed across a total of five databases, searching published articles from 2001 onwards that assessed performance and optimal function in relation to resilience, in defence and security personnel. Following narrative synthesis, studies were assessed for quality. Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria across a range of performance domains, including, but not limited to, course selection, marksmanship, land navigation, and simulated captivity. Some of the key findings included measures of mental toughness, confidence, and a stress-is-enhancing mindset being positively associated with performance outcomes. There was mixed evidence for the predictive value of biomarkers, although there was some support for cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and neuropeptide-y (NPY), and vagal reactivity. Interventions to improve resilient performance were focused on mindfulness or general psychological skills, with effects generally clearer on cognitive tasks rather than direct performance outcomes in the field. In sum, no single measure, nor intervention was consistently associated with performance over a range of domains. To inform future work, findings from the present review have been used to develop a framework of resilient performance, with the aim to promote theoretically informed work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95291072022-10-04 A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings Jones, Marc Vincent Smith, Nathan Burns, Danielle Braithwaite, Elizabeth Turner, Martin McCann, Andy Walker, Lucy Emmerson, Paul Webster, Leonie Jones, Martin PLoS One Research Article A narrative systematic literature review was conducted to explore resilient performance in defence and security settings. A search strategy was employed across a total of five databases, searching published articles from 2001 onwards that assessed performance and optimal function in relation to resilience, in defence and security personnel. Following narrative synthesis, studies were assessed for quality. Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria across a range of performance domains, including, but not limited to, course selection, marksmanship, land navigation, and simulated captivity. Some of the key findings included measures of mental toughness, confidence, and a stress-is-enhancing mindset being positively associated with performance outcomes. There was mixed evidence for the predictive value of biomarkers, although there was some support for cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and neuropeptide-y (NPY), and vagal reactivity. Interventions to improve resilient performance were focused on mindfulness or general psychological skills, with effects generally clearer on cognitive tasks rather than direct performance outcomes in the field. In sum, no single measure, nor intervention was consistently associated with performance over a range of domains. To inform future work, findings from the present review have been used to develop a framework of resilient performance, with the aim to promote theoretically informed work. Public Library of Science 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9529107/ /pubmed/36190945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273015 Text en © 2022 Jones et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jones, Marc Vincent
Smith, Nathan
Burns, Danielle
Braithwaite, Elizabeth
Turner, Martin
McCann, Andy
Walker, Lucy
Emmerson, Paul
Webster, Leonie
Jones, Martin
A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
title A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
title_full A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
title_fullStr A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
title_short A systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
title_sort systematic review of resilient performance in defence and security settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36190945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273015
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesmarcvincent asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT smithnathan asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT burnsdanielle asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT braithwaiteelizabeth asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT turnermartin asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT mccannandy asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT walkerlucy asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT emmersonpaul asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT websterleonie asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT jonesmartin asystematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT jonesmarcvincent systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT smithnathan systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT burnsdanielle systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT braithwaiteelizabeth systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT turnermartin systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT mccannandy systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT walkerlucy systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT emmersonpaul systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT websterleonie systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings
AT jonesmartin systematicreviewofresilientperformanceindefenceandsecuritysettings