Cargando…
A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has caused substantial impact on population health, healthcare, and social and economic systems around the world. Several vaccines have been developed to control the pandemic with varying effectiveness and safety profi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36191018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272642 |
_version_ | 1784801438941052928 |
---|---|
author | Lun, Penny Gao, Jonathan Tang, Bernard Yu, Chou Chuen Jabbar, Khalid Abdul Low, James Alvin George, Pradeep Paul |
author_facet | Lun, Penny Gao, Jonathan Tang, Bernard Yu, Chou Chuen Jabbar, Khalid Abdul Low, James Alvin George, Pradeep Paul |
author_sort | Lun, Penny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has caused substantial impact on population health, healthcare, and social and economic systems around the world. Several vaccines have been developed to control the pandemic with varying effectiveness and safety profiles. One of the biggest obstacles to implementing successful vaccination programmes is vaccine hesitancy stemming from concerns about effectiveness and safety. This review aims to identify the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance and to organize the factors using the social ecological framework. METHODS: We adopted the five-stage methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley to guide this scoping review. Selection criteria was based on the PICo (Population, Phenomenon of interest and Context) framework. Factors associated with acceptance and hesitancy were grouped into the following: intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and public policy factors using the social ecological framework. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies fulfilled this review’s inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in Europe and North America, followed by Asia and the Middle East. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy rates varied across countries. Some common demographic factors associated with hesitancy were younger age, being female, having lower than college education, and having a lower income level. Most of the barriers and facilitators to acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines were intrapersonal factors, such as personal characteristics and preferences, concerns with COVID-19 vaccines, history/perception of general vaccination, and knowledge of COVID-19 and health. The remaining interpersonal, institution, community, and public policy factors were grouped into factors identified as barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: Our review identified barriers and facilitators of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy and organised them using the social ecological framework. While some barriers and facilitators such as vaccine safety are universal, differentiated barriers might exist for different target groups, which need to be understood if they are to be addressed to maximize vaccine acceptance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9529136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95291362022-10-04 A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review Lun, Penny Gao, Jonathan Tang, Bernard Yu, Chou Chuen Jabbar, Khalid Abdul Low, James Alvin George, Pradeep Paul PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has caused substantial impact on population health, healthcare, and social and economic systems around the world. Several vaccines have been developed to control the pandemic with varying effectiveness and safety profiles. One of the biggest obstacles to implementing successful vaccination programmes is vaccine hesitancy stemming from concerns about effectiveness and safety. This review aims to identify the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance and to organize the factors using the social ecological framework. METHODS: We adopted the five-stage methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley to guide this scoping review. Selection criteria was based on the PICo (Population, Phenomenon of interest and Context) framework. Factors associated with acceptance and hesitancy were grouped into the following: intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and public policy factors using the social ecological framework. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies fulfilled this review’s inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in Europe and North America, followed by Asia and the Middle East. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy rates varied across countries. Some common demographic factors associated with hesitancy were younger age, being female, having lower than college education, and having a lower income level. Most of the barriers and facilitators to acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines were intrapersonal factors, such as personal characteristics and preferences, concerns with COVID-19 vaccines, history/perception of general vaccination, and knowledge of COVID-19 and health. The remaining interpersonal, institution, community, and public policy factors were grouped into factors identified as barriers and facilitators. CONCLUSION: Our review identified barriers and facilitators of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy and organised them using the social ecological framework. While some barriers and facilitators such as vaccine safety are universal, differentiated barriers might exist for different target groups, which need to be understood if they are to be addressed to maximize vaccine acceptance. Public Library of Science 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9529136/ /pubmed/36191018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272642 Text en © 2022 Lun et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lun, Penny Gao, Jonathan Tang, Bernard Yu, Chou Chuen Jabbar, Khalid Abdul Low, James Alvin George, Pradeep Paul A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review |
title | A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review |
title_full | A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review |
title_short | A social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination acceptance: A scoping review |
title_sort | social ecological approach to identify the barriers and facilitators to covid-19 vaccination acceptance: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36191018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lunpenny asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT gaojonathan asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT tangbernard asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT yuchouchuen asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT jabbarkhalidabdul asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT lowjamesalvin asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT georgepradeeppaul asocialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT lunpenny socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT gaojonathan socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT tangbernard socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT yuchouchuen socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT jabbarkhalidabdul socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT lowjamesalvin socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview AT georgepradeeppaul socialecologicalapproachtoidentifythebarriersandfacilitatorstocovid19vaccinationacceptanceascopingreview |