Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations

Recent studies have shown that adaptation to visual feedback perturbations during arm reaching movements involves implicit and explicit learning components. Evidence also suggests that explicit, intentional learning mechanisms are largely responsible for savings—a faster recalibration compared with initial training. However, the extent explicit learning mechanisms facilitate learning and early savings (i.e., the rapid recall of previous performance) for motion state-dependent learning is generally unknown. To address this question, we compared the early savings/recall achieved by two groups of human subjects. One experienced physical perturbations (a velocity-dependent force-field, vFF) to promote adaptation that is thought to be a largely implicit process. The second was only given visual feedback of the required force-velocity relationship; subjects moved in force channels and we provided visual feedback of the lateral force exerted during the movement, as well as the required force pattern based on the movement velocity. Thus, subjects were shown explicit information on the extent the applied temporal pattern of force matched the required velocity-dependent force profile if the force-field perturbation had been applied. After training, both groups experienced a decay and washout period, which was followed by a reexposure block to assess early savings/recall. Although decay was faster for the explicit visual feedback group, the single-trial recall was similar to the physical perturbation group. Thus, compared with visual feedback perturbations, conscious modification of motor output based on motion state-dependent feedback demonstrates rapid recall, but this adjustment is less stable than adaptation based on experiencing the multisensory errors that accompany physical perturbations. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The extent explicit feedback facilitates motion state-dependent changes to motor output is largely unknown. Here, we examined motor adaptation for subjects that experienced physical perturbations and another that made adjustments based on explicit visual feedback information of the required force-velocity relationship. Our results suggest that adjustment of motor output can be based on explicit motion state-dependent information and demonstrates rapid recall, but this learning is less stable than adaptation based on physical perturbations to movement.