Cargando…
Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0138 |
_version_ | 1784801466581516288 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Brandon G. Tumpa, Stasa Mantle, Orla Whiffin, Charlotte J. Mee, Harry Solla, Davi J. Fontoura Paiva, Wellingson S. Newcombe, Virginia F.J. Kolias, Angelos G. Hutchinson, Peter J. |
author_facet | Smith, Brandon G. Tumpa, Stasa Mantle, Orla Whiffin, Charlotte J. Mee, Harry Solla, Davi J. Fontoura Paiva, Wellingson S. Newcombe, Virginia F.J. Kolias, Angelos G. Hutchinson, Peter J. |
author_sort | Smith, Brandon G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of “telemedicine,” “TBI,” “outcome assessment,” and “patient-generated health data.” Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%, n = 21), short message service (SMS; 10%, n = 4), smartphones (22.5%, n = 9), videoconferencing (10%, n = 4), digital assistants (2.5%, n = 1), and custom devices (2.5%, n = 1) among cohorts of patients with TBI of varying injury severity. Where reported, clinical facilitators, remote follow-up timing and intervals between sessions, synchronicity of follow-up instances, proxy involvement, outcome measures utilized, and technology evaluation efforts are described. FUTs can aid more temporally sensitive assessments and capture fluctuating sequelae, a benefit of particular relevance to TBI cohorts. However, the evidence base surrounding FUTs remains in its infancy, particularly with respect to large samples, low- and middle-income patient cohorts, and the validation of outcome measures for deployment via such remote technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9529313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95293132022-10-04 Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review Smith, Brandon G. Tumpa, Stasa Mantle, Orla Whiffin, Charlotte J. Mee, Harry Solla, Davi J. Fontoura Paiva, Wellingson S. Newcombe, Virginia F.J. Kolias, Angelos G. Hutchinson, Peter J. J Neurotrauma Reviews Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of “telemedicine,” “TBI,” “outcome assessment,” and “patient-generated health data.” Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%, n = 21), short message service (SMS; 10%, n = 4), smartphones (22.5%, n = 9), videoconferencing (10%, n = 4), digital assistants (2.5%, n = 1), and custom devices (2.5%, n = 1) among cohorts of patients with TBI of varying injury severity. Where reported, clinical facilitators, remote follow-up timing and intervals between sessions, synchronicity of follow-up instances, proxy involvement, outcome measures utilized, and technology evaluation efforts are described. FUTs can aid more temporally sensitive assessments and capture fluctuating sequelae, a benefit of particular relevance to TBI cohorts. However, the evidence base surrounding FUTs remains in its infancy, particularly with respect to large samples, low- and middle-income patient cohorts, and the validation of outcome measures for deployment via such remote technology. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-10-01 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9529313/ /pubmed/35730115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0138 Text en © Brandon G. Smith et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Smith, Brandon G. Tumpa, Stasa Mantle, Orla Whiffin, Charlotte J. Mee, Harry Solla, Davi J. Fontoura Paiva, Wellingson S. Newcombe, Virginia F.J. Kolias, Angelos G. Hutchinson, Peter J. Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title | Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | remote follow-up technologies in traumatic brain injury: a scoping review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithbrandong remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT tumpastasa remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT mantleorla remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT whiffincharlottej remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT meeharry remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT solladavijfontoura remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT paivawellingsons remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT newcombevirginiafj remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT koliasangelosg remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview AT hutchinsonpeterj remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview |