Cargando…

Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Brandon G., Tumpa, Stasa, Mantle, Orla, Whiffin, Charlotte J., Mee, Harry, Solla, Davi J. Fontoura, Paiva, Wellingson S., Newcombe, Virginia F.J., Kolias, Angelos G., Hutchinson, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0138
_version_ 1784801466581516288
author Smith, Brandon G.
Tumpa, Stasa
Mantle, Orla
Whiffin, Charlotte J.
Mee, Harry
Solla, Davi J. Fontoura
Paiva, Wellingson S.
Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
Kolias, Angelos G.
Hutchinson, Peter J.
author_facet Smith, Brandon G.
Tumpa, Stasa
Mantle, Orla
Whiffin, Charlotte J.
Mee, Harry
Solla, Davi J. Fontoura
Paiva, Wellingson S.
Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
Kolias, Angelos G.
Hutchinson, Peter J.
author_sort Smith, Brandon G.
collection PubMed
description Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of “telemedicine,” “TBI,” “outcome assessment,” and “patient-generated health data.” Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%, n = 21), short message service (SMS; 10%, n = 4), smartphones (22.5%, n = 9), videoconferencing (10%, n = 4), digital assistants (2.5%, n = 1), and custom devices (2.5%, n = 1) among cohorts of patients with TBI of varying injury severity. Where reported, clinical facilitators, remote follow-up timing and intervals between sessions, synchronicity of follow-up instances, proxy involvement, outcome measures utilized, and technology evaluation efforts are described. FUTs can aid more temporally sensitive assessments and capture fluctuating sequelae, a benefit of particular relevance to TBI cohorts. However, the evidence base surrounding FUTs remains in its infancy, particularly with respect to large samples, low- and middle-income patient cohorts, and the validation of outcome measures for deployment via such remote technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95293132022-10-04 Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review Smith, Brandon G. Tumpa, Stasa Mantle, Orla Whiffin, Charlotte J. Mee, Harry Solla, Davi J. Fontoura Paiva, Wellingson S. Newcombe, Virginia F.J. Kolias, Angelos G. Hutchinson, Peter J. J Neurotrauma Reviews Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of “telemedicine,” “TBI,” “outcome assessment,” and “patient-generated health data.” Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%, n = 21), short message service (SMS; 10%, n = 4), smartphones (22.5%, n = 9), videoconferencing (10%, n = 4), digital assistants (2.5%, n = 1), and custom devices (2.5%, n = 1) among cohorts of patients with TBI of varying injury severity. Where reported, clinical facilitators, remote follow-up timing and intervals between sessions, synchronicity of follow-up instances, proxy involvement, outcome measures utilized, and technology evaluation efforts are described. FUTs can aid more temporally sensitive assessments and capture fluctuating sequelae, a benefit of particular relevance to TBI cohorts. However, the evidence base surrounding FUTs remains in its infancy, particularly with respect to large samples, low- and middle-income patient cohorts, and the validation of outcome measures for deployment via such remote technology. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-10-01 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9529313/ /pubmed/35730115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0138 Text en © Brandon G. Smith et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Smith, Brandon G.
Tumpa, Stasa
Mantle, Orla
Whiffin, Charlotte J.
Mee, Harry
Solla, Davi J. Fontoura
Paiva, Wellingson S.
Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
Kolias, Angelos G.
Hutchinson, Peter J.
Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
title Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
title_full Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
title_short Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
title_sort remote follow-up technologies in traumatic brain injury: a scoping review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35730115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0138
work_keys_str_mv AT smithbrandong remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT tumpastasa remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT mantleorla remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT whiffincharlottej remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT meeharry remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT solladavijfontoura remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT paivawellingsons remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT newcombevirginiafj remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT koliasangelosg remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview
AT hutchinsonpeterj remotefollowuptechnologiesintraumaticbraininjuryascopingreview