Cargando…

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has gained increasing popularity in the management of complicated colorectal polyps. However, clinical outcomes for ESD have remained highly inconsistent worldwide. This study investigated and analysed factors that significantly affect ESD outcomes....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Chi Woo Samuel, Fung, Tak Lit Derek, Chan, Pak Tat, Kwok, Kam Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09672-2
_version_ 1784801467092172800
author Chow, Chi Woo Samuel
Fung, Tak Lit Derek
Chan, Pak Tat
Kwok, Kam Hung
author_facet Chow, Chi Woo Samuel
Fung, Tak Lit Derek
Chan, Pak Tat
Kwok, Kam Hung
author_sort Chow, Chi Woo Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has gained increasing popularity in the management of complicated colorectal polyps. However, clinical outcomes for ESD have remained highly inconsistent worldwide. This study investigated and analysed factors that significantly affect ESD outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-centred retrospective study on 220 colorectal polyps removed by ESD from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2020. Data were collected and retrieved from clinical records. Variables studied included patient demographics, ESD technicalities and polyp characteristics. The primary outcome was completeness of resection based on en bloc and R0 resection rates. The secondary outcomes were recurrence, complications and hospital stay. Further analysis was performed for significant outcome determining factors. RESULTS: The en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 97.3% and 65% respectively. Intraprocedural and delayed perforation rates were 3.2% and 0.5% respectively. Intraprocedural and delayed bleeding rates were both 1.8%. Post-polypectomy syndrome rate was 2.7%. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Submucosal fibrosis was a significant determining factor for lower en bloc resection (p = 0.004), lower R0 resection (p = 0.002), intraprocedural perforation (p = 0.001), intraprocedural bleeding (p = 0.025) and post-polypectomy syndrome (p = 0.039). Hybrid snaring was associated with lower en bloc resection (p < 0.001), while longer ESD time was associated with lower R0 resection (p = 0.003) and post-polypectomy syndrome (p = 0.025). Other significant factors for post-polypectomy syndrome included young age (p = 0.021) and large polyp size (p = 0.018). Secondary analysis showed that submucosal fibrosis was significantly associated with non-granular lesions (p < 0.001) and prior biopsy (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Submucosal fibrosis, hybrid snaring, ESD time, age and polyp size were significant outcome determining factors for ESD. By identifying these factors, strategies may be formulated to improve ESD outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95293202022-10-04 Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors Chow, Chi Woo Samuel Fung, Tak Lit Derek Chan, Pak Tat Kwok, Kam Hung Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has gained increasing popularity in the management of complicated colorectal polyps. However, clinical outcomes for ESD have remained highly inconsistent worldwide. This study investigated and analysed factors that significantly affect ESD outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-centred retrospective study on 220 colorectal polyps removed by ESD from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2020. Data were collected and retrieved from clinical records. Variables studied included patient demographics, ESD technicalities and polyp characteristics. The primary outcome was completeness of resection based on en bloc and R0 resection rates. The secondary outcomes were recurrence, complications and hospital stay. Further analysis was performed for significant outcome determining factors. RESULTS: The en bloc resection and R0 resection rates were 97.3% and 65% respectively. Intraprocedural and delayed perforation rates were 3.2% and 0.5% respectively. Intraprocedural and delayed bleeding rates were both 1.8%. Post-polypectomy syndrome rate was 2.7%. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Submucosal fibrosis was a significant determining factor for lower en bloc resection (p = 0.004), lower R0 resection (p = 0.002), intraprocedural perforation (p = 0.001), intraprocedural bleeding (p = 0.025) and post-polypectomy syndrome (p = 0.039). Hybrid snaring was associated with lower en bloc resection (p < 0.001), while longer ESD time was associated with lower R0 resection (p = 0.003) and post-polypectomy syndrome (p = 0.025). Other significant factors for post-polypectomy syndrome included young age (p = 0.021) and large polyp size (p = 0.018). Secondary analysis showed that submucosal fibrosis was significantly associated with non-granular lesions (p < 0.001) and prior biopsy (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Submucosal fibrosis, hybrid snaring, ESD time, age and polyp size were significant outcome determining factors for ESD. By identifying these factors, strategies may be formulated to improve ESD outcomes. Springer US 2022-10-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9529320/ /pubmed/36192659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09672-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chow, Chi Woo Samuel
Fung, Tak Lit Derek
Chan, Pak Tat
Kwok, Kam Hung
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
title Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
title_full Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
title_fullStr Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
title_short Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
title_sort endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09672-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chowchiwoosamuel endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforcolorectalpolypsoutcomedeterminingfactors
AT fungtaklitderek endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforcolorectalpolypsoutcomedeterminingfactors
AT chanpaktat endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforcolorectalpolypsoutcomedeterminingfactors
AT kwokkamhung endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforcolorectalpolypsoutcomedeterminingfactors