Cargando…
Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma
Clinical evaluation, differential diagnosis, and management of a neck mass constitute commonly encountered problems for the head and neck surgeon. An asymptomatic neck mass in adults may be the only clinical sign of head and neck cancer. A 50-year-old female patient presented with a painless, slowly...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4582262 |
_version_ | 1784801515567841280 |
---|---|
author | Karatzanis, Alexander Mylopotamitaki, Kleanthi Lagoudaki, Eleni Prokopakis, Emmanuel Agelaki, Sofia |
author_facet | Karatzanis, Alexander Mylopotamitaki, Kleanthi Lagoudaki, Eleni Prokopakis, Emmanuel Agelaki, Sofia |
author_sort | Karatzanis, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical evaluation, differential diagnosis, and management of a neck mass constitute commonly encountered problems for the head and neck surgeon. An asymptomatic neck mass in adults may be the only clinical sign of head and neck cancer. A 50-year-old female patient presented with a painless, slowly enlarging, left lateral neck lump. Ultrasonography described a possible lymph node with cystic degeneration, and fine needle aspiration biopsy only detected atypical cells of squamous epithelium. An open biopsy under general anesthesia was performed. Histopathological findings suggested the diagnosis of lymph node infiltration by squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site, but differential diagnosis also included branchiogenic carcinoma arising in a branchial cleft cyst. A diagnostic algorithm for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site was followed, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography. The patient underwent panendoscopy and bilateral tonsillectomy, and an ipsilateral p16 positive tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma was detected. Further appropriate management followed. The existence of true branchiogenic carcinoma is controversial. When such a diagnosis is contemplated, every effort should be made to detect a possible primary site. Branchiogenic carcinoma, if exists at all, remains a diagnosis of exclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9529529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95295292022-10-04 Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma Karatzanis, Alexander Mylopotamitaki, Kleanthi Lagoudaki, Eleni Prokopakis, Emmanuel Agelaki, Sofia Case Rep Otolaryngol Case Report Clinical evaluation, differential diagnosis, and management of a neck mass constitute commonly encountered problems for the head and neck surgeon. An asymptomatic neck mass in adults may be the only clinical sign of head and neck cancer. A 50-year-old female patient presented with a painless, slowly enlarging, left lateral neck lump. Ultrasonography described a possible lymph node with cystic degeneration, and fine needle aspiration biopsy only detected atypical cells of squamous epithelium. An open biopsy under general anesthesia was performed. Histopathological findings suggested the diagnosis of lymph node infiltration by squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site, but differential diagnosis also included branchiogenic carcinoma arising in a branchial cleft cyst. A diagnostic algorithm for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site was followed, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography. The patient underwent panendoscopy and bilateral tonsillectomy, and an ipsilateral p16 positive tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma was detected. Further appropriate management followed. The existence of true branchiogenic carcinoma is controversial. When such a diagnosis is contemplated, every effort should be made to detect a possible primary site. Branchiogenic carcinoma, if exists at all, remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Hindawi 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9529529/ /pubmed/36199676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4582262 Text en Copyright © 2022 Alexander Karatzanis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Karatzanis, Alexander Mylopotamitaki, Kleanthi Lagoudaki, Eleni Prokopakis, Emmanuel Agelaki, Sofia Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma |
title | Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma |
title_full | Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma |
title_short | Clinical Controversy Surrounding the Differential Diagnosis of Branchiogenic Carcinoma |
title_sort | clinical controversy surrounding the differential diagnosis of branchiogenic carcinoma |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4582262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karatzanisalexander clinicalcontroversysurroundingthedifferentialdiagnosisofbranchiogeniccarcinoma AT mylopotamitakikleanthi clinicalcontroversysurroundingthedifferentialdiagnosisofbranchiogeniccarcinoma AT lagoudakieleni clinicalcontroversysurroundingthedifferentialdiagnosisofbranchiogeniccarcinoma AT prokopakisemmanuel clinicalcontroversysurroundingthedifferentialdiagnosisofbranchiogeniccarcinoma AT agelakisofia clinicalcontroversysurroundingthedifferentialdiagnosisofbranchiogeniccarcinoma |