Cargando…

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases

Although systemic therapy is standard management for patients with metastatic disease, several recent reports have indicated that an addition of local therapies including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) could improve survival. The lung is th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimura, Tomoki, Fujiwara, Toshiki, Kameoka, Tsubasa, Adachi, Yoshinori, Kariya, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01323-9
_version_ 1784801558488154112
author Kimura, Tomoki
Fujiwara, Toshiki
Kameoka, Tsubasa
Adachi, Yoshinori
Kariya, Shinji
author_facet Kimura, Tomoki
Fujiwara, Toshiki
Kameoka, Tsubasa
Adachi, Yoshinori
Kariya, Shinji
author_sort Kimura, Tomoki
collection PubMed
description Although systemic therapy is standard management for patients with metastatic disease, several recent reports have indicated that an addition of local therapies including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) could improve survival. The lung is the most common site of distant metastasis from many solid tumors, and the strategy of SBRT, such as dose-fraction schedules, timing, etc., would be different depending on the type of primary tumor, location, and patterns of OMD. This review describes the role of SBRT with curative-intent for patients with pulmonary OMD for each of these variables. First, differences according to the type of primary tumor, for which many studies suggest that SBRT-mediated local control (LC) for patients with pulmonary OMD from colorectal cancer (CRC) is less successful than for those from non-CRC tumors. In addition, higher dose-fraction schedules seemed to correlate with higher LC; hence, different SBRT treatment strategies may be needed for patients with pulmonary OMD from CRC relative to other tumors. Second, differences according to location, where the safety of SBRT for peripheral pulmonary tumors has been relatively well established, but safety for central pulmonary tumors including pulmonary OMD is still considered controversial. To determine the optimal dose-fraction schedules, further data from prospective studies are still needed. Third, differences according to the patterns of OMD, the number of metastases and the timing of SBRT whereby 1–5 lesions in most patients and patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD are considered good candidates for SBRT. We conclude that there are still several problems in defining suitable indications for local therapy including SBRT, and that further prospective studies are required to resolve these issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9529709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95297092022-10-05 Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases Kimura, Tomoki Fujiwara, Toshiki Kameoka, Tsubasa Adachi, Yoshinori Kariya, Shinji Jpn J Radiol Invited Review Although systemic therapy is standard management for patients with metastatic disease, several recent reports have indicated that an addition of local therapies including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) could improve survival. The lung is the most common site of distant metastasis from many solid tumors, and the strategy of SBRT, such as dose-fraction schedules, timing, etc., would be different depending on the type of primary tumor, location, and patterns of OMD. This review describes the role of SBRT with curative-intent for patients with pulmonary OMD for each of these variables. First, differences according to the type of primary tumor, for which many studies suggest that SBRT-mediated local control (LC) for patients with pulmonary OMD from colorectal cancer (CRC) is less successful than for those from non-CRC tumors. In addition, higher dose-fraction schedules seemed to correlate with higher LC; hence, different SBRT treatment strategies may be needed for patients with pulmonary OMD from CRC relative to other tumors. Second, differences according to location, where the safety of SBRT for peripheral pulmonary tumors has been relatively well established, but safety for central pulmonary tumors including pulmonary OMD is still considered controversial. To determine the optimal dose-fraction schedules, further data from prospective studies are still needed. Third, differences according to the patterns of OMD, the number of metastases and the timing of SBRT whereby 1–5 lesions in most patients and patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD are considered good candidates for SBRT. We conclude that there are still several problems in defining suitable indications for local therapy including SBRT, and that further prospective studies are required to resolve these issues. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-09-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9529709/ /pubmed/36097233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01323-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Invited Review
Kimura, Tomoki
Fujiwara, Toshiki
Kameoka, Tsubasa
Adachi, Yoshinori
Kariya, Shinji
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
title Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
title_full Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
title_fullStr Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
title_short Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
title_sort stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01323-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimuratomoki stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyformetastaticlungmetastases
AT fujiwaratoshiki stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyformetastaticlungmetastases
AT kameokatsubasa stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyformetastaticlungmetastases
AT adachiyoshinori stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyformetastaticlungmetastases
AT kariyashinji stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyformetastaticlungmetastases