Cargando…

Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments

The Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) is an independent non-statutory committee established by the Australian government to provide recommendations on public reimbursement of technologies and services, other than pharmaceuticals. MSAC has established approaches for undertaking health techno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norris, Sarah, Belcher, Andrea, Howard, Kirsten, Ward, Robyn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34570356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00551-2
_version_ 1784801604424171520
author Norris, Sarah
Belcher, Andrea
Howard, Kirsten
Ward, Robyn L.
author_facet Norris, Sarah
Belcher, Andrea
Howard, Kirsten
Ward, Robyn L.
author_sort Norris, Sarah
collection PubMed
description The Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) is an independent non-statutory committee established by the Australian government to provide recommendations on public reimbursement of technologies and services, other than pharmaceuticals. MSAC has established approaches for undertaking health technology assessment (HTA) of investigative services and codependent technologies. In 2016, MSAC published its clinical utility card (CUC) Proforma, an additional tool to guide assessments of genetic testing for heritable conditions. We undertook a review and narrative synthesis of information extracted from all MSAC assessments of genetic testing for heritable conditions completed since 2016, regardless of the HTA approach taken. Ten assessments met our inclusion criteria, covering a range of testing methods (from gene panels to whole-exome sequencing) and purposes (including molecular diagnosis, genetic risk assessment, identification of congenital anomaly syndromes, and carrier screening). This analysis identified a range of methodological and policy challenges such as how to incorporate patient and societal preferences for the health and non-health outcomes of genomic testing, how best to capture the concept of co-production of utility, and how to engage clinicians as referrers for genomics tests whilst at the same time ensuring equity of access to a geographically dispersed population. A further challenge related to how qualitative assessments of patient and community needs influenced the evidence thresholds against which decisions were made. These concepts should be considered for incorporation within the value assessment frameworks used by HTA agencies around the world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9530105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95301052022-10-05 Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments Norris, Sarah Belcher, Andrea Howard, Kirsten Ward, Robyn L. J Community Genet Original Article The Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) is an independent non-statutory committee established by the Australian government to provide recommendations on public reimbursement of technologies and services, other than pharmaceuticals. MSAC has established approaches for undertaking health technology assessment (HTA) of investigative services and codependent technologies. In 2016, MSAC published its clinical utility card (CUC) Proforma, an additional tool to guide assessments of genetic testing for heritable conditions. We undertook a review and narrative synthesis of information extracted from all MSAC assessments of genetic testing for heritable conditions completed since 2016, regardless of the HTA approach taken. Ten assessments met our inclusion criteria, covering a range of testing methods (from gene panels to whole-exome sequencing) and purposes (including molecular diagnosis, genetic risk assessment, identification of congenital anomaly syndromes, and carrier screening). This analysis identified a range of methodological and policy challenges such as how to incorporate patient and societal preferences for the health and non-health outcomes of genomic testing, how best to capture the concept of co-production of utility, and how to engage clinicians as referrers for genomics tests whilst at the same time ensuring equity of access to a geographically dispersed population. A further challenge related to how qualitative assessments of patient and community needs influenced the evidence thresholds against which decisions were made. These concepts should be considered for incorporation within the value assessment frameworks used by HTA agencies around the world. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-27 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9530105/ /pubmed/34570356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00551-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Norris, Sarah
Belcher, Andrea
Howard, Kirsten
Ward, Robyn L.
Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
title Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
title_full Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
title_fullStr Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
title_short Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
title_sort evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34570356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00551-2
work_keys_str_mv AT norrissarah evaluatinggeneticandgenomictestsforheritableconditionsinaustralialessonslearntfromhealthtechnologyassessments
AT belcherandrea evaluatinggeneticandgenomictestsforheritableconditionsinaustralialessonslearntfromhealthtechnologyassessments
AT howardkirsten evaluatinggeneticandgenomictestsforheritableconditionsinaustralialessonslearntfromhealthtechnologyassessments
AT wardrobynl evaluatinggeneticandgenomictestsforheritableconditionsinaustralialessonslearntfromhealthtechnologyassessments