Cargando…
Validity testing of the conspiratorial thinking and anti-expert sentiment scales during the COVID-19 pandemic across 24 languages from a large-scale global dataset
In this study, we tested the validity across two scales addressing conspiratorial thinking that may influence behaviours related to public health and the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the COVIDiSTRESSII Global Survey data from 12 261 participants, we validated the 4-item Conspiratorial Thinking Scale and...
Autores principales: | Han, Hyemin, Blackburn, Angélique M., Jeftić, Alma, Tran, Thao Phuong, Stöckli, Sabrina, Reifler, Jason, Vestergren, Sara |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268822001443 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The conspiratorial style in lay economic thinking
por: Leiser, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Editorial: Exploration of dietary correlates of conspiratorial thinking
por: Rastmanesh, Reza, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The effects of secondary stressors, social identity, and social support on perceived stress and resilience: Findings from the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Ntontis, Evangelos, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
COVIDiSTRESS diverse dataset on psychological and behavioural outcomes one year into the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Blackburn, Angélique M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cross-language validation of COVID-19 Compliance Scale in 28 languages
por: Blackburn, Angélique M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)