Cargando…
Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review
Industry 4.0 (I4.0) promises to transform jobs and working conditions through the implementation of unprecedented human-machine interaction modes. As the operator working in these new settings, known as the Operator 4.0, is a relatively recent concept, and although technological developments are exp...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889129 |
_version_ | 1784801672403353600 |
---|---|
author | Cunha, Liliana Silva, Daniel Maggioli, Sarah |
author_facet | Cunha, Liliana Silva, Daniel Maggioli, Sarah |
author_sort | Cunha, Liliana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Industry 4.0 (I4.0) promises to transform jobs and working conditions through the implementation of unprecedented human-machine interaction modes. As the operator working in these new settings, known as the Operator 4.0, is a relatively recent concept, and although technological developments are expected to support workers and require higher labor skills, the risks and health impacts resulting from these changes remain underexplored. This systematic review aims to (i) systematize literature findings on how workers are perceived and participate in I4.0 work systems; (ii) identify the main technological changes driven by I4.0; and (iii) instigate discussion regarding the impacts these changes may have for workers and the sustainability of work systems. Following a systematic review approach using the PRISMA protocol, the articles were organized into two main analysis axes: the technical changes brought about by I4.0, and the representation of the human worker within these new work settings. The findings reveal that a techno-centered approach still seems to be dominant in guiding the implementation of I4.0 models; secondly, as a consequence, the social dimensions of work tend to remain as residual issues, overshadowed by the promises related with technology (e.g., productivity, efficiency); finally, the representation of the Operator 4.0 remains blurry, as he/she is perceived as gender neutral, skillful, and perfectly fit for work, assuring the functioning (and compensating for the limits) of these systems. While I4.0 promises safer and more productive workplaces, issues related to employment conditions, emerging risks and health impacts become more prominent when analyzed from an activity-centered perspective. In terms of future research, a more heuristic analysis could be achieved through a participatory and work-centered approach and following a gender perspective. This way, visibility could be conferred to another side of I4.0, thus guaranteeing conditions for the sustainable development of these work situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9530396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95303962022-10-05 Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review Cunha, Liliana Silva, Daniel Maggioli, Sarah Front Psychol Psychology Industry 4.0 (I4.0) promises to transform jobs and working conditions through the implementation of unprecedented human-machine interaction modes. As the operator working in these new settings, known as the Operator 4.0, is a relatively recent concept, and although technological developments are expected to support workers and require higher labor skills, the risks and health impacts resulting from these changes remain underexplored. This systematic review aims to (i) systematize literature findings on how workers are perceived and participate in I4.0 work systems; (ii) identify the main technological changes driven by I4.0; and (iii) instigate discussion regarding the impacts these changes may have for workers and the sustainability of work systems. Following a systematic review approach using the PRISMA protocol, the articles were organized into two main analysis axes: the technical changes brought about by I4.0, and the representation of the human worker within these new work settings. The findings reveal that a techno-centered approach still seems to be dominant in guiding the implementation of I4.0 models; secondly, as a consequence, the social dimensions of work tend to remain as residual issues, overshadowed by the promises related with technology (e.g., productivity, efficiency); finally, the representation of the Operator 4.0 remains blurry, as he/she is perceived as gender neutral, skillful, and perfectly fit for work, assuring the functioning (and compensating for the limits) of these systems. While I4.0 promises safer and more productive workplaces, issues related to employment conditions, emerging risks and health impacts become more prominent when analyzed from an activity-centered perspective. In terms of future research, a more heuristic analysis could be achieved through a participatory and work-centered approach and following a gender perspective. This way, visibility could be conferred to another side of I4.0, thus guaranteeing conditions for the sustainable development of these work situations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9530396/ /pubmed/36204753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889129 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cunha, Silva and Maggioli. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Cunha, Liliana Silva, Daniel Maggioli, Sarah Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review |
title | Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review |
title_full | Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review |
title_short | Exploring the status of the human operator in Industry 4.0: A systematic review |
title_sort | exploring the status of the human operator in industry 4.0: a systematic review |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cunhaliliana exploringthestatusofthehumanoperatorinindustry40asystematicreview AT silvadaniel exploringthestatusofthehumanoperatorinindustry40asystematicreview AT maggiolisarah exploringthestatusofthehumanoperatorinindustry40asystematicreview |