Cargando…
Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study
We conducted a mixed methods pilot feasibility study of a Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation (SEDDI) process to facilitate using healthcare data to identify patient groups experiencing gaps in the use of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and rapidly adapt EBIs to achieve greater acc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01442-9 |
_version_ | 1784801680672423936 |
---|---|
author | Aschbrenner, Kelly A. Kruse, Gina Emmons, Karen M. Singh, Deepinder Barber-Dubois, Marjanna E. Miller, Angela M. Thomas, Annette N. Bartels, Stephen J. |
author_facet | Aschbrenner, Kelly A. Kruse, Gina Emmons, Karen M. Singh, Deepinder Barber-Dubois, Marjanna E. Miller, Angela M. Thomas, Annette N. Bartels, Stephen J. |
author_sort | Aschbrenner, Kelly A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We conducted a mixed methods pilot feasibility study of a Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation (SEDDI) process to facilitate using healthcare data to identify patient groups experiencing gaps in the use of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and rapidly adapt EBIs to achieve greater access and equitable outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of SEDDI in a pilot hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial of a paired colorectal cancer (CRC) and social needs screening intervention at four federally qualified community health centers (CHCs). An external facilitator partnered with CHC teams to support initial implementation, followed by the SEDDI phase focused on advancing health equity. Facilitation sessions were delivered over 8 months. Preliminary evaluation of SEDDI involved convergent mixed methods with quantitative survey and focus group data. CHCs used data to identify gaps in outreach and completion of CRC screening with respect to race/ethnicity, gender, age, and language. Adaptations to improve access and use of the intervention included cultural, linguistic, and health literacy tailoring. CHC teams reported that facilitation and systematic review of data were helpful in identifying and prioritizing gaps. None of the four CHCs completed rapid cycle testing of adaptations largely due to competing priorities during the COVID-19 response. SEDDI has the potential for advancing chronic disease prevention and management by providing a stakeholder and data-driven approach to identify and prioritize health equity targets and guide adaptations to improve health equity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585919. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9530430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95304302022-10-04 Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study Aschbrenner, Kelly A. Kruse, Gina Emmons, Karen M. Singh, Deepinder Barber-Dubois, Marjanna E. Miller, Angela M. Thomas, Annette N. Bartels, Stephen J. Prev Sci Article We conducted a mixed methods pilot feasibility study of a Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation (SEDDI) process to facilitate using healthcare data to identify patient groups experiencing gaps in the use of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and rapidly adapt EBIs to achieve greater access and equitable outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of SEDDI in a pilot hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial of a paired colorectal cancer (CRC) and social needs screening intervention at four federally qualified community health centers (CHCs). An external facilitator partnered with CHC teams to support initial implementation, followed by the SEDDI phase focused on advancing health equity. Facilitation sessions were delivered over 8 months. Preliminary evaluation of SEDDI involved convergent mixed methods with quantitative survey and focus group data. CHCs used data to identify gaps in outreach and completion of CRC screening with respect to race/ethnicity, gender, age, and language. Adaptations to improve access and use of the intervention included cultural, linguistic, and health literacy tailoring. CHC teams reported that facilitation and systematic review of data were helpful in identifying and prioritizing gaps. None of the four CHCs completed rapid cycle testing of adaptations largely due to competing priorities during the COVID-19 response. SEDDI has the potential for advancing chronic disease prevention and management by providing a stakeholder and data-driven approach to identify and prioritize health equity targets and guide adaptations to improve health equity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585919. Springer US 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9530430/ /pubmed/36194312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01442-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Aschbrenner, Kelly A. Kruse, Gina Emmons, Karen M. Singh, Deepinder Barber-Dubois, Marjanna E. Miller, Angela M. Thomas, Annette N. Bartels, Stephen J. Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study |
title | Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study |
title_full | Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study |
title_fullStr | Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study |
title_short | Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study |
title_sort | stakeholder and equity data-driven implementation: a mixed methods pilot feasibility study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01442-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aschbrennerkellya stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT krusegina stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT emmonskarenm stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT singhdeepinder stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT barberduboismarjannae stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT millerangelam stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT thomasannetten stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy AT bartelsstephenj stakeholderandequitydatadrivenimplementationamixedmethodspilotfeasibilitystudy |