Cargando…

Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Mammographic density is a well-defined risk factor for breast cancer and having extremely dense breast tissue is associated with a one-to six-fold increased risk of breast cancer. However, it is questioned whether this increased risk estimate is applicable to current breast density class...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodewes, F.T.H., van Asselt, A.A., Dorrius, M.D., Greuter, M.J.W., de Bock, G.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007
_version_ 1784801734059622400
author Bodewes, F.T.H.
van Asselt, A.A.
Dorrius, M.D.
Greuter, M.J.W.
de Bock, G.H.
author_facet Bodewes, F.T.H.
van Asselt, A.A.
Dorrius, M.D.
Greuter, M.J.W.
de Bock, G.H.
author_sort Bodewes, F.T.H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Mammographic density is a well-defined risk factor for breast cancer and having extremely dense breast tissue is associated with a one-to six-fold increased risk of breast cancer. However, it is questioned whether this increased risk estimate is applicable to current breast density classification methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further investigate and clarify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk based on current literature. METHODS: Medline, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published since 2013, that used BI-RADS lexicon 5th edition and incorporated data on digital mammography. Crude and maximally confounder-adjusted data were pooled in odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects models. Heterogeneity regarding breast cancer risks were investigated using I(2) statistic, stratified and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Nine observational studies were included. Having extremely dense breast tissue (BI-RADS density D) resulted in a 2.11-fold (95% CI 1.84–2.42) increased breast cancer risk compared to having scattered dense breast tissue (BI-RADS density B). Sensitivity analysis showed that when only using data that had adjusted for age and BMI, the breast cancer risk was 1.83-fold (95% CI 1.52–2.21) increased. Both results were statistically significant and homogenous. CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic breast density BI-RADS D is associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of breast cancer compared to having BI-RADS density B in general population women. This is a novel and lower risk estimate compared to previously reported and might be explained due to the use of digital mammography and BI-RADS lexicon 5th edition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9530665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95306652022-10-05 Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Bodewes, F.T.H. van Asselt, A.A. Dorrius, M.D. Greuter, M.J.W. de Bock, G.H. Breast Review OBJECTIVES: Mammographic density is a well-defined risk factor for breast cancer and having extremely dense breast tissue is associated with a one-to six-fold increased risk of breast cancer. However, it is questioned whether this increased risk estimate is applicable to current breast density classification methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further investigate and clarify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk based on current literature. METHODS: Medline, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for articles published since 2013, that used BI-RADS lexicon 5th edition and incorporated data on digital mammography. Crude and maximally confounder-adjusted data were pooled in odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects models. Heterogeneity regarding breast cancer risks were investigated using I(2) statistic, stratified and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Nine observational studies were included. Having extremely dense breast tissue (BI-RADS density D) resulted in a 2.11-fold (95% CI 1.84–2.42) increased breast cancer risk compared to having scattered dense breast tissue (BI-RADS density B). Sensitivity analysis showed that when only using data that had adjusted for age and BMI, the breast cancer risk was 1.83-fold (95% CI 1.52–2.21) increased. Both results were statistically significant and homogenous. CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic breast density BI-RADS D is associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of breast cancer compared to having BI-RADS density B in general population women. This is a novel and lower risk estimate compared to previously reported and might be explained due to the use of digital mammography and BI-RADS lexicon 5th edition. Elsevier 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9530665/ /pubmed/36183671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bodewes, F.T.H.
van Asselt, A.A.
Dorrius, M.D.
Greuter, M.J.W.
de Bock, G.H.
Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36183671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.09.007
work_keys_str_mv AT bodewesfth mammographicbreastdensityandtheriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanasseltaa mammographicbreastdensityandtheriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dorriusmd mammographicbreastdensityandtheriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT greutermjw mammographicbreastdensityandtheriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT debockgh mammographicbreastdensityandtheriskofbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis