Cargando…

Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy

To overcome the increasing burden on pathologists in diagnosing gastric biopsies, we developed an artificial intelligence‐based system for the pathological diagnosis of gastric biopsies (AI‐G), which is expected to work well in daily clinical practice in multiple institutes. The multistage semantic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abe, Hiroyuki, Kurose, Yusuke, Takahama, Shusuke, Kume, Ayako, Nishida, Shu, Fukasawa, Miyako, Yasunaga, Yoichi, Ushiku, Tetsuo, Ninomiya, Youichiro, Yoshizawa, Akihiko, Murao, Kohei, Sato, Shin’ichi, Kitsuregawa, Masaru, Harada, Tatsuya, Kitagawa, Masanobu, Fukayama, Masashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15514
_version_ 1784801774141440000
author Abe, Hiroyuki
Kurose, Yusuke
Takahama, Shusuke
Kume, Ayako
Nishida, Shu
Fukasawa, Miyako
Yasunaga, Yoichi
Ushiku, Tetsuo
Ninomiya, Youichiro
Yoshizawa, Akihiko
Murao, Kohei
Sato, Shin’ichi
Kitsuregawa, Masaru
Harada, Tatsuya
Kitagawa, Masanobu
Fukayama, Masashi
author_facet Abe, Hiroyuki
Kurose, Yusuke
Takahama, Shusuke
Kume, Ayako
Nishida, Shu
Fukasawa, Miyako
Yasunaga, Yoichi
Ushiku, Tetsuo
Ninomiya, Youichiro
Yoshizawa, Akihiko
Murao, Kohei
Sato, Shin’ichi
Kitsuregawa, Masaru
Harada, Tatsuya
Kitagawa, Masanobu
Fukayama, Masashi
author_sort Abe, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description To overcome the increasing burden on pathologists in diagnosing gastric biopsies, we developed an artificial intelligence‐based system for the pathological diagnosis of gastric biopsies (AI‐G), which is expected to work well in daily clinical practice in multiple institutes. The multistage semantic segmentation for pathology (MSP) method utilizes the distribution of feature values extracted from patches of whole‐slide images (WSI) like pathologists’ “low‐power view” information of microscopy. The training dataset included WSIs of 4511 gastric biopsy tissues from 984 patients. In tissue‐level validation, MSP AI‐G showed better accuracy (91.0%) than that of conventional patch‐based AI‐G (PB AI‐G) (89.8%). Importantly, MSP AI‐G unanimously achieved higher accuracy rates (0.946 ± 0.023) than PB AI‐G (0.861 ± 0.078) in tissue‐level analysis, when applied to the cohorts of 10 different institutes (3450 samples of 1772 patients in all institutes, 198–555 samples of 143–206 patients in each institute). MSP AI‐G had high diagnostic accuracy and robustness in multi‐institutions. When pathologists selectively review specimens in which pathologist’s diagnosis and AI prediction are discordant, the requirement of a secondary review process is significantly less compared with reviewing all specimens by another pathologist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9530856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95308562022-10-11 Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy Abe, Hiroyuki Kurose, Yusuke Takahama, Shusuke Kume, Ayako Nishida, Shu Fukasawa, Miyako Yasunaga, Yoichi Ushiku, Tetsuo Ninomiya, Youichiro Yoshizawa, Akihiko Murao, Kohei Sato, Shin’ichi Kitsuregawa, Masaru Harada, Tatsuya Kitagawa, Masanobu Fukayama, Masashi Cancer Sci Original Articles To overcome the increasing burden on pathologists in diagnosing gastric biopsies, we developed an artificial intelligence‐based system for the pathological diagnosis of gastric biopsies (AI‐G), which is expected to work well in daily clinical practice in multiple institutes. The multistage semantic segmentation for pathology (MSP) method utilizes the distribution of feature values extracted from patches of whole‐slide images (WSI) like pathologists’ “low‐power view” information of microscopy. The training dataset included WSIs of 4511 gastric biopsy tissues from 984 patients. In tissue‐level validation, MSP AI‐G showed better accuracy (91.0%) than that of conventional patch‐based AI‐G (PB AI‐G) (89.8%). Importantly, MSP AI‐G unanimously achieved higher accuracy rates (0.946 ± 0.023) than PB AI‐G (0.861 ± 0.078) in tissue‐level analysis, when applied to the cohorts of 10 different institutes (3450 samples of 1772 patients in all institutes, 198–555 samples of 143–206 patients in each institute). MSP AI‐G had high diagnostic accuracy and robustness in multi‐institutions. When pathologists selectively review specimens in which pathologist’s diagnosis and AI prediction are discordant, the requirement of a secondary review process is significantly less compared with reviewing all specimens by another pathologist. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-12 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9530856/ /pubmed/36068652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15514 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Abe, Hiroyuki
Kurose, Yusuke
Takahama, Shusuke
Kume, Ayako
Nishida, Shu
Fukasawa, Miyako
Yasunaga, Yoichi
Ushiku, Tetsuo
Ninomiya, Youichiro
Yoshizawa, Akihiko
Murao, Kohei
Sato, Shin’ichi
Kitsuregawa, Masaru
Harada, Tatsuya
Kitagawa, Masanobu
Fukayama, Masashi
Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
title Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
title_full Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
title_fullStr Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
title_short Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
title_sort development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15514
work_keys_str_mv AT abehiroyuki developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT kuroseyusuke developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT takahamashusuke developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT kumeayako developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT nishidashu developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT fukasawamiyako developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT yasunagayoichi developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT ushikutetsuo developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT ninomiyayouichiro developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT yoshizawaakihiko developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT muraokohei developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT satoshinichi developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT kitsuregawamasaru developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT haradatatsuya developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT kitagawamasanobu developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT fukayamamasashi developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy
AT developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy