Cargando…
Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy
To overcome the increasing burden on pathologists in diagnosing gastric biopsies, we developed an artificial intelligence‐based system for the pathological diagnosis of gastric biopsies (AI‐G), which is expected to work well in daily clinical practice in multiple institutes. The multistage semantic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15514 |
_version_ | 1784801774141440000 |
---|---|
author | Abe, Hiroyuki Kurose, Yusuke Takahama, Shusuke Kume, Ayako Nishida, Shu Fukasawa, Miyako Yasunaga, Yoichi Ushiku, Tetsuo Ninomiya, Youichiro Yoshizawa, Akihiko Murao, Kohei Sato, Shin’ichi Kitsuregawa, Masaru Harada, Tatsuya Kitagawa, Masanobu Fukayama, Masashi |
author_facet | Abe, Hiroyuki Kurose, Yusuke Takahama, Shusuke Kume, Ayako Nishida, Shu Fukasawa, Miyako Yasunaga, Yoichi Ushiku, Tetsuo Ninomiya, Youichiro Yoshizawa, Akihiko Murao, Kohei Sato, Shin’ichi Kitsuregawa, Masaru Harada, Tatsuya Kitagawa, Masanobu Fukayama, Masashi |
author_sort | Abe, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | To overcome the increasing burden on pathologists in diagnosing gastric biopsies, we developed an artificial intelligence‐based system for the pathological diagnosis of gastric biopsies (AI‐G), which is expected to work well in daily clinical practice in multiple institutes. The multistage semantic segmentation for pathology (MSP) method utilizes the distribution of feature values extracted from patches of whole‐slide images (WSI) like pathologists’ “low‐power view” information of microscopy. The training dataset included WSIs of 4511 gastric biopsy tissues from 984 patients. In tissue‐level validation, MSP AI‐G showed better accuracy (91.0%) than that of conventional patch‐based AI‐G (PB AI‐G) (89.8%). Importantly, MSP AI‐G unanimously achieved higher accuracy rates (0.946 ± 0.023) than PB AI‐G (0.861 ± 0.078) in tissue‐level analysis, when applied to the cohorts of 10 different institutes (3450 samples of 1772 patients in all institutes, 198–555 samples of 143–206 patients in each institute). MSP AI‐G had high diagnostic accuracy and robustness in multi‐institutions. When pathologists selectively review specimens in which pathologist’s diagnosis and AI prediction are discordant, the requirement of a secondary review process is significantly less compared with reviewing all specimens by another pathologist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9530856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95308562022-10-11 Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy Abe, Hiroyuki Kurose, Yusuke Takahama, Shusuke Kume, Ayako Nishida, Shu Fukasawa, Miyako Yasunaga, Yoichi Ushiku, Tetsuo Ninomiya, Youichiro Yoshizawa, Akihiko Murao, Kohei Sato, Shin’ichi Kitsuregawa, Masaru Harada, Tatsuya Kitagawa, Masanobu Fukayama, Masashi Cancer Sci Original Articles To overcome the increasing burden on pathologists in diagnosing gastric biopsies, we developed an artificial intelligence‐based system for the pathological diagnosis of gastric biopsies (AI‐G), which is expected to work well in daily clinical practice in multiple institutes. The multistage semantic segmentation for pathology (MSP) method utilizes the distribution of feature values extracted from patches of whole‐slide images (WSI) like pathologists’ “low‐power view” information of microscopy. The training dataset included WSIs of 4511 gastric biopsy tissues from 984 patients. In tissue‐level validation, MSP AI‐G showed better accuracy (91.0%) than that of conventional patch‐based AI‐G (PB AI‐G) (89.8%). Importantly, MSP AI‐G unanimously achieved higher accuracy rates (0.946 ± 0.023) than PB AI‐G (0.861 ± 0.078) in tissue‐level analysis, when applied to the cohorts of 10 different institutes (3450 samples of 1772 patients in all institutes, 198–555 samples of 143–206 patients in each institute). MSP AI‐G had high diagnostic accuracy and robustness in multi‐institutions. When pathologists selectively review specimens in which pathologist’s diagnosis and AI prediction are discordant, the requirement of a secondary review process is significantly less compared with reviewing all specimens by another pathologist. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-12 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9530856/ /pubmed/36068652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15514 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Abe, Hiroyuki Kurose, Yusuke Takahama, Shusuke Kume, Ayako Nishida, Shu Fukasawa, Miyako Yasunaga, Yoichi Ushiku, Tetsuo Ninomiya, Youichiro Yoshizawa, Akihiko Murao, Kohei Sato, Shin’ichi Kitsuregawa, Masaru Harada, Tatsuya Kitagawa, Masanobu Fukayama, Masashi Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
title | Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
title_full | Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
title_fullStr | Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
title_short | Development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
title_sort | development and multi‐institutional validation of an artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic system for gastric biopsy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abehiroyuki developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT kuroseyusuke developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT takahamashusuke developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT kumeayako developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT nishidashu developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT fukasawamiyako developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT yasunagayoichi developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT ushikutetsuo developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT ninomiyayouichiro developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT yoshizawaakihiko developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT muraokohei developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT satoshinichi developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT kitsuregawamasaru developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT haradatatsuya developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT kitagawamasanobu developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT fukayamamasashi developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy AT developmentandmultiinstitutionalvalidationofanartificialintelligencebaseddiagnosticsystemforgastricbiopsy |