Cargando…

Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an umbrella term for bladder cancers (BCa) and upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with BCa and UTUC sometimes detected concomitantly. The methods of detection for UC are often inaccurate or highly invasive, and, therefore, are thought to be unsatisfactory. Previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Urabe, Fumihiko, Matsuzaki, Juntaro, Takeshita, Fumitaka, Kishida, Takeshi, Ochiya, Takahiro, Hirai, Kotaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15496
_version_ 1784801780643659776
author Urabe, Fumihiko
Matsuzaki, Juntaro
Takeshita, Fumitaka
Kishida, Takeshi
Ochiya, Takahiro
Hirai, Kotaro
author_facet Urabe, Fumihiko
Matsuzaki, Juntaro
Takeshita, Fumitaka
Kishida, Takeshi
Ochiya, Takahiro
Hirai, Kotaro
author_sort Urabe, Fumihiko
collection PubMed
description Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an umbrella term for bladder cancers (BCa) and upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with BCa and UTUC sometimes detected concomitantly. The methods of detection for UC are often inaccurate or highly invasive, and, therefore, are thought to be unsatisfactory. Previously, we reported seven serum miRNAs as diagnostic markers for BCa. Here, we re‐evaluated potential diagnostic miRNAs in different institutions. We prospectively analyzed serum samples obtained from 126 UC patients (BCa: 106 samples; UTUC: 14 samples; UTUC with BCa: six samples) and 50 noncancer controls by microarray analysis. We randomly assigned these samples into a training or a validation set. Biomarker candidate miRNAs were selected based on cross‐validation scores in the training set of samples, with diagnostic power confirmed in the validation set. Among the diagnostic miRNAs identified in this way, miR‐1343‐5p and miR‐6087 had been identified as potential diagnostic miRNAs in our previous study. In addition, we evaluated the association between the serum levels of identified miRNAs and the presence of UC risk conditions. The expression levels of several miRNAs correlate with the risk factors in participants without UC, which may be explained by the presence of a microscopic tumor or a precancerous lesion. In conclusion, we identified two robust miRNA diagnostic markers for UC detection. Further functional analysis is required to elucidate the mechanism by which alterations in the expression of these miRNAs occur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9530882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95308822022-10-11 Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma Urabe, Fumihiko Matsuzaki, Juntaro Takeshita, Fumitaka Kishida, Takeshi Ochiya, Takahiro Hirai, Kotaro Cancer Sci ORIGINAL ARTICLES Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an umbrella term for bladder cancers (BCa) and upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with BCa and UTUC sometimes detected concomitantly. The methods of detection for UC are often inaccurate or highly invasive, and, therefore, are thought to be unsatisfactory. Previously, we reported seven serum miRNAs as diagnostic markers for BCa. Here, we re‐evaluated potential diagnostic miRNAs in different institutions. We prospectively analyzed serum samples obtained from 126 UC patients (BCa: 106 samples; UTUC: 14 samples; UTUC with BCa: six samples) and 50 noncancer controls by microarray analysis. We randomly assigned these samples into a training or a validation set. Biomarker candidate miRNAs were selected based on cross‐validation scores in the training set of samples, with diagnostic power confirmed in the validation set. Among the diagnostic miRNAs identified in this way, miR‐1343‐5p and miR‐6087 had been identified as potential diagnostic miRNAs in our previous study. In addition, we evaluated the association between the serum levels of identified miRNAs and the presence of UC risk conditions. The expression levels of several miRNAs correlate with the risk factors in participants without UC, which may be explained by the presence of a microscopic tumor or a precancerous lesion. In conclusion, we identified two robust miRNA diagnostic markers for UC detection. Further functional analysis is required to elucidate the mechanism by which alterations in the expression of these miRNAs occur. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-12 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9530882/ /pubmed/35848873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15496 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Urabe, Fumihiko
Matsuzaki, Juntaro
Takeshita, Fumitaka
Kishida, Takeshi
Ochiya, Takahiro
Hirai, Kotaro
Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
title Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
title_full Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
title_short Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
title_sort independent verification of circulating mirna as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15496
work_keys_str_mv AT urabefumihiko independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma
AT matsuzakijuntaro independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma
AT takeshitafumitaka independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma
AT kishidatakeshi independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma
AT ochiyatakahiro independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma
AT hiraikotaro independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma