Cargando…
Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an umbrella term for bladder cancers (BCa) and upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with BCa and UTUC sometimes detected concomitantly. The methods of detection for UC are often inaccurate or highly invasive, and, therefore, are thought to be unsatisfactory. Previous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15496 |
_version_ | 1784801780643659776 |
---|---|
author | Urabe, Fumihiko Matsuzaki, Juntaro Takeshita, Fumitaka Kishida, Takeshi Ochiya, Takahiro Hirai, Kotaro |
author_facet | Urabe, Fumihiko Matsuzaki, Juntaro Takeshita, Fumitaka Kishida, Takeshi Ochiya, Takahiro Hirai, Kotaro |
author_sort | Urabe, Fumihiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an umbrella term for bladder cancers (BCa) and upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with BCa and UTUC sometimes detected concomitantly. The methods of detection for UC are often inaccurate or highly invasive, and, therefore, are thought to be unsatisfactory. Previously, we reported seven serum miRNAs as diagnostic markers for BCa. Here, we re‐evaluated potential diagnostic miRNAs in different institutions. We prospectively analyzed serum samples obtained from 126 UC patients (BCa: 106 samples; UTUC: 14 samples; UTUC with BCa: six samples) and 50 noncancer controls by microarray analysis. We randomly assigned these samples into a training or a validation set. Biomarker candidate miRNAs were selected based on cross‐validation scores in the training set of samples, with diagnostic power confirmed in the validation set. Among the diagnostic miRNAs identified in this way, miR‐1343‐5p and miR‐6087 had been identified as potential diagnostic miRNAs in our previous study. In addition, we evaluated the association between the serum levels of identified miRNAs and the presence of UC risk conditions. The expression levels of several miRNAs correlate with the risk factors in participants without UC, which may be explained by the presence of a microscopic tumor or a precancerous lesion. In conclusion, we identified two robust miRNA diagnostic markers for UC detection. Further functional analysis is required to elucidate the mechanism by which alterations in the expression of these miRNAs occur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9530882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95308822022-10-11 Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma Urabe, Fumihiko Matsuzaki, Juntaro Takeshita, Fumitaka Kishida, Takeshi Ochiya, Takahiro Hirai, Kotaro Cancer Sci ORIGINAL ARTICLES Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an umbrella term for bladder cancers (BCa) and upper‐tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with BCa and UTUC sometimes detected concomitantly. The methods of detection for UC are often inaccurate or highly invasive, and, therefore, are thought to be unsatisfactory. Previously, we reported seven serum miRNAs as diagnostic markers for BCa. Here, we re‐evaluated potential diagnostic miRNAs in different institutions. We prospectively analyzed serum samples obtained from 126 UC patients (BCa: 106 samples; UTUC: 14 samples; UTUC with BCa: six samples) and 50 noncancer controls by microarray analysis. We randomly assigned these samples into a training or a validation set. Biomarker candidate miRNAs were selected based on cross‐validation scores in the training set of samples, with diagnostic power confirmed in the validation set. Among the diagnostic miRNAs identified in this way, miR‐1343‐5p and miR‐6087 had been identified as potential diagnostic miRNAs in our previous study. In addition, we evaluated the association between the serum levels of identified miRNAs and the presence of UC risk conditions. The expression levels of several miRNAs correlate with the risk factors in participants without UC, which may be explained by the presence of a microscopic tumor or a precancerous lesion. In conclusion, we identified two robust miRNA diagnostic markers for UC detection. Further functional analysis is required to elucidate the mechanism by which alterations in the expression of these miRNAs occur. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-12 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9530882/ /pubmed/35848873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15496 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Urabe, Fumihiko Matsuzaki, Juntaro Takeshita, Fumitaka Kishida, Takeshi Ochiya, Takahiro Hirai, Kotaro Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
title | Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
title_full | Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
title_short | Independent verification of circulating miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
title_sort | independent verification of circulating mirna as diagnostic biomarkers for urothelial carcinoma |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urabefumihiko independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma AT matsuzakijuntaro independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma AT takeshitafumitaka independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma AT kishidatakeshi independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma AT ochiyatakahiro independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma AT hiraikotaro independentverificationofcirculatingmirnaasdiagnosticbiomarkersforurothelialcarcinoma |