Cargando…

Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics

Amyloid formation is linked to devastating neurodegenerative diseases, motivating detailed studies of the mechanisms of amyloid formation. For Aβ, the peptide associated with Alzheimer’s disease, the mechanism and rate of aggregation have been established for a range of variants and conditions in vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiffert, Tanja, Meisl, Georg, Curk, Samo, Cukalevski, Risto, Šarić, Anđela, Knowles, Tuomas P. J., Linse, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.943355
_version_ 1784801838797684736
author Weiffert, Tanja
Meisl, Georg
Curk, Samo
Cukalevski, Risto
Šarić, Anđela
Knowles, Tuomas P. J.
Linse, Sara
author_facet Weiffert, Tanja
Meisl, Georg
Curk, Samo
Cukalevski, Risto
Šarić, Anđela
Knowles, Tuomas P. J.
Linse, Sara
author_sort Weiffert, Tanja
collection PubMed
description Amyloid formation is linked to devastating neurodegenerative diseases, motivating detailed studies of the mechanisms of amyloid formation. For Aβ, the peptide associated with Alzheimer’s disease, the mechanism and rate of aggregation have been established for a range of variants and conditions in vitro and in bodily fluids. A key outstanding question is how the relative stabilities of monomers, fibrils and intermediates affect each step in the fibril formation process. By monitoring the kinetics of aggregation of Aβ42, in the presence of urea or guanidinium hydrochloride (GuHCl), we here determine the rates of the underlying microscopic steps and establish the importance of changes in relative stability induced by the presence of denaturant for each individual step. Denaturants shift the equilibrium towards the unfolded state of each species. We find that a non-ionic denaturant, urea, reduces the overall aggregation rate, and that the effect on nucleation is stronger than the effect on elongation. Urea reduces the rate of secondary nucleation by decreasing the coverage of fibril surfaces and the rate of nucleus formation. It also reduces the rate of primary nucleation, increasing its reaction order. The ionic denaturant, GuHCl, accelerates the aggregation at low denaturant concentrations and decelerates the aggregation at high denaturant concentrations. Below approximately 0.25 M GuHCl, the screening of repulsive electrostatic interactions between peptides by the charged denaturant dominates, leading to an increased aggregation rate. At higher GuHCl concentrations, the electrostatic repulsion is completely screened, and the denaturing effect dominates. The results illustrate how the differential effects of denaturants on stability of monomer, oligomer and fibril translate to differential effects on microscopic steps, with the rate of nucleation being most strongly reduced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95311392022-10-05 Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics Weiffert, Tanja Meisl, Georg Curk, Samo Cukalevski, Risto Šarić, Anđela Knowles, Tuomas P. J. Linse, Sara Front Neurosci Neuroscience Amyloid formation is linked to devastating neurodegenerative diseases, motivating detailed studies of the mechanisms of amyloid formation. For Aβ, the peptide associated with Alzheimer’s disease, the mechanism and rate of aggregation have been established for a range of variants and conditions in vitro and in bodily fluids. A key outstanding question is how the relative stabilities of monomers, fibrils and intermediates affect each step in the fibril formation process. By monitoring the kinetics of aggregation of Aβ42, in the presence of urea or guanidinium hydrochloride (GuHCl), we here determine the rates of the underlying microscopic steps and establish the importance of changes in relative stability induced by the presence of denaturant for each individual step. Denaturants shift the equilibrium towards the unfolded state of each species. We find that a non-ionic denaturant, urea, reduces the overall aggregation rate, and that the effect on nucleation is stronger than the effect on elongation. Urea reduces the rate of secondary nucleation by decreasing the coverage of fibril surfaces and the rate of nucleus formation. It also reduces the rate of primary nucleation, increasing its reaction order. The ionic denaturant, GuHCl, accelerates the aggregation at low denaturant concentrations and decelerates the aggregation at high denaturant concentrations. Below approximately 0.25 M GuHCl, the screening of repulsive electrostatic interactions between peptides by the charged denaturant dominates, leading to an increased aggregation rate. At higher GuHCl concentrations, the electrostatic repulsion is completely screened, and the denaturing effect dominates. The results illustrate how the differential effects of denaturants on stability of monomer, oligomer and fibril translate to differential effects on microscopic steps, with the rate of nucleation being most strongly reduced. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9531139/ /pubmed/36203800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.943355 Text en Copyright © 2022 Weiffert, Meisl, Curk, Cukalevski, Šarić, Knowles and Linse. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Weiffert, Tanja
Meisl, Georg
Curk, Samo
Cukalevski, Risto
Šarić, Anđela
Knowles, Tuomas P. J.
Linse, Sara
Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
title Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
title_full Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
title_fullStr Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
title_full_unstemmed Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
title_short Influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
title_sort influence of denaturants on amyloid β42 aggregation kinetics
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.943355
work_keys_str_mv AT weifferttanja influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics
AT meislgeorg influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics
AT curksamo influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics
AT cukalevskiristo influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics
AT saricanđela influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics
AT knowlestuomaspj influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics
AT linsesara influenceofdenaturantsonamyloidb42aggregationkinetics