Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused many concerns in the dental field regarding aerosol production and the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus during dental procedures. Because of the abrupt arrival of COVID-19, there has been little to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrett, Barton, McGovern, Jason, Catanzaro, William, Coble, Shandra, Redden, David, Fouad, Ashraf F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association of Endodontists. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.007
_version_ 1784801887639306240
author Barrett, Barton
McGovern, Jason
Catanzaro, William
Coble, Shandra
Redden, David
Fouad, Ashraf F.
author_facet Barrett, Barton
McGovern, Jason
Catanzaro, William
Coble, Shandra
Redden, David
Fouad, Ashraf F.
author_sort Barrett, Barton
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused many concerns in the dental field regarding aerosol production and the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus during dental procedures. Because of the abrupt arrival of COVID-19, there has been little to no published research on the efficacy of dental suction devices in the removal of aerosols related to COVID-19 or the impact extraoral suction devices have on patients’ experiences. Therefore, the aim of this study was to measure the amount of aerosol produced during endodontic access preparation for root canal therapy with and without the use of an extraoral dental suction device and to gather information through a survey regarding patients’ experiences. METHODS: Aerosol measurements were recorded in 8 closed-door resident operatories each morning before the procedures, 1 minute during the procedure, and 15 minutes after the access was complete. The CICADA DTO KN99 Extraoral Dental Suction Device (Foshan Cicada, Guangdong, China) was placed in 4 operatories, whereas no DTO extraoral suction device was used in 4 control operatories. Twenty cases with DTO and 20 cases without it were completed, and the data were analyzed. RESULTS: Aerosols 1 minute after access were higher with and without DTO. There was a significant reduction after 15 minutes when the DTO device was used compared to high-volume suction alone. Composite and zirconia produced the most aerosols at 1 minute. CONCLUSION: The results show that the reduction of aerosols is enhanced when the extraoral suction device is used in combination with traditional high-volume evacuation. However, the increased noise level when using the device can have a negative impact on patients’ dental experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association of Endodontists.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95313672022-10-04 Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation Barrett, Barton McGovern, Jason Catanzaro, William Coble, Shandra Redden, David Fouad, Ashraf F. J Endod Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused many concerns in the dental field regarding aerosol production and the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus during dental procedures. Because of the abrupt arrival of COVID-19, there has been little to no published research on the efficacy of dental suction devices in the removal of aerosols related to COVID-19 or the impact extraoral suction devices have on patients’ experiences. Therefore, the aim of this study was to measure the amount of aerosol produced during endodontic access preparation for root canal therapy with and without the use of an extraoral dental suction device and to gather information through a survey regarding patients’ experiences. METHODS: Aerosol measurements were recorded in 8 closed-door resident operatories each morning before the procedures, 1 minute during the procedure, and 15 minutes after the access was complete. The CICADA DTO KN99 Extraoral Dental Suction Device (Foshan Cicada, Guangdong, China) was placed in 4 operatories, whereas no DTO extraoral suction device was used in 4 control operatories. Twenty cases with DTO and 20 cases without it were completed, and the data were analyzed. RESULTS: Aerosols 1 minute after access were higher with and without DTO. There was a significant reduction after 15 minutes when the DTO device was used compared to high-volume suction alone. Composite and zirconia produced the most aerosols at 1 minute. CONCLUSION: The results show that the reduction of aerosols is enhanced when the extraoral suction device is used in combination with traditional high-volume evacuation. However, the increased noise level when using the device can have a negative impact on patients’ dental experience. American Association of Endodontists. 2022-12 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9531367/ /pubmed/36206990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.007 Text en © 2022 American Association of Endodontists. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Barrett, Barton
McGovern, Jason
Catanzaro, William
Coble, Shandra
Redden, David
Fouad, Ashraf F.
Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation
title Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation
title_full Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation
title_short Clinical Efficacy of an Extraoral Dental Evacuation Device in Aerosol Elimination During Endodontic Access Preparation
title_sort clinical efficacy of an extraoral dental evacuation device in aerosol elimination during endodontic access preparation
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.09.007
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettbarton clinicalefficacyofanextraoraldentalevacuationdeviceinaerosoleliminationduringendodonticaccesspreparation
AT mcgovernjason clinicalefficacyofanextraoraldentalevacuationdeviceinaerosoleliminationduringendodonticaccesspreparation
AT catanzarowilliam clinicalefficacyofanextraoraldentalevacuationdeviceinaerosoleliminationduringendodonticaccesspreparation
AT cobleshandra clinicalefficacyofanextraoraldentalevacuationdeviceinaerosoleliminationduringendodonticaccesspreparation
AT reddendavid clinicalefficacyofanextraoraldentalevacuationdeviceinaerosoleliminationduringendodonticaccesspreparation
AT fouadashraff clinicalefficacyofanextraoraldentalevacuationdeviceinaerosoleliminationduringendodonticaccesspreparation