Cargando…

Both indirect maternal and direct fetal genetic effects reflect the observational relationship between higher birth weight and lower adult bone mass

BACKGROUND: Birth weight is considered not only to undermine future growth, but also to induce lifelong diseases; the aim of this study is to explore the relationship between birth weight and adult bone mass. METHODS: We performed multivariable regression analyses to assess the association of birth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Jiang-Wei, Zhang, Lin, Li, Jin, Yuan, Cheng-Da, Zhu, Xiao-Wei, Qian, Yu, Khederzadeh, Saber, Gu, Jia-Xuan, Xu, Lin, Gao, Jian-Hua, Liu, Ke-Qi, Karasik, David, Xie, Shu-Yang, Chen, Guo-Bo, Zheng, Hou-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02531-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Birth weight is considered not only to undermine future growth, but also to induce lifelong diseases; the aim of this study is to explore the relationship between birth weight and adult bone mass. METHODS: We performed multivariable regression analyses to assess the association of birth weight with bone parameters measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and by quantitative ultrasound (QUS), independently. We also implemented a systemic Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal association between them with both fetal-specific and maternal-specific instrumental variables. RESULTS: In the observational analyses, we found that higher birth weight could increase the adult bone area (lumbar spine, β-coefficient= 0.17, P < 2.00 × 10(−16); lateral spine, β-coefficient = 0.02, P = 0.04), decrease bone mineral content-adjusted bone area (BMCadjArea) (lumbar spine, β-coefficient= − 0.01, P = 2.27 × 10(−14); lateral spine, β-coefficient = − 0.05, P = 0.001), and decrease adult bone mineral density (BMD) (lumbar spine, β-coefficient = − 0.04, P = 0.007; lateral spine; β-coefficient = − 0.03, P = 0.02; heel, β-coefficient = − 0.06, P < 2.00 × 10(−16)), and we observed that the effect of birth weight on bone size was larger than that on BMC. In MR analyses, the higher fetal-specific genetically determined birth weight was identified to be associated with higher bone area (lumbar spine; β-coefficient = 0.15, P = 1.26 × 10(−6), total hip, β-coefficient = 0.15, P = 0.005; intertrochanteric area, β-coefficient = 0.13, P = 0.0009; trochanter area, β-coefficient = 0.11, P = 0.03) but lower BMD (lumbar spine, β-coefficient = − 0.10, P = 0.01; lateral spine, β-coefficient = − 0.12, P = 0.0003, and heel β-coefficient = − 0.11, P = 3.33 × 10(−13)). In addition, we found that the higher maternal-specific genetically determined offspring birth weight was associated with lower offspring adult heel BMD (β-coefficient = − 0.001, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The observational analyses suggested that higher birth weight was associated with the increased adult bone area but decreased BMD. By leveraging the genetic instrumental variables with maternal- and fetal-specific effects on birth weight, the observed relationship could be reflected by both the direct fetal and indirect maternal genetic effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02531-w.