Cargando…

The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) + HMG protocol vs ultra-long gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol in patients with advanced ovarian endometriosis who received in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Three hundred patients with advan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Haiyan, Du, Tong, Gao, Hongyuan, Xi, Qianwen, Wu, Ling, Lyu, Qifeng, Zhu, Qianqian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01500-z
_version_ 1784801895905230848
author Guo, Haiyan
Du, Tong
Gao, Hongyuan
Xi, Qianwen
Wu, Ling
Lyu, Qifeng
Zhu, Qianqian
author_facet Guo, Haiyan
Du, Tong
Gao, Hongyuan
Xi, Qianwen
Wu, Ling
Lyu, Qifeng
Zhu, Qianqian
author_sort Guo, Haiyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) + HMG protocol vs ultra-long gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol in patients with advanced ovarian endometriosis who received in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Three hundred patients with advanced ovary endometriosis who underwent IVF were included, and embryological and clinical outcomes were assessed between March 2017 and September 2017. Patients were divided into MPA + HMG group and 1-month ultra-long GnRHa protocol group. RESULTS: Lower hMG dose and shorter medication time were found in the MPA + HMG group than in the GnRHa group (P < 0.05). Follicle to-Oocyte Index was significantly different between MPA + HMG group and GnRHa group (P < 0.001). No differences were found in the ovary response and numbers of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes and viable embryos. The clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes were similar between MPA + HMG group and GnRHa group, and these outcomes were independent of fresh or frozen embryo transfer in the GnRHa protocol group. There were no significant differences in the time to embryo transfer, medical cost and adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy outcomes after MPA + HMG protocol are similar to those after ultra-long GnRHa protocol in women with ovarian endometriosis. MPA + HMG protocol may be an alternative to ultra-long GnRHa protocol for IVF in ovary endometriosis patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-17010924) PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: In conclusion, the administration of MPA in COH showed similar number of oocytes retrieved, no premature LH surge, and similar pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI as compared to the one-month long protocol. The use of MPA in COH appears to be promising although many questions remain to be elucidated, including the dose and time of progestin priming as well as its possible influence on the oocyte development potential and microenvironment. Given their good tolerability, few metabolic influence, and low cost, progestogens provide a novel alternative to the conventional protocol for patients with endometriosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95314092022-10-05 The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial Guo, Haiyan Du, Tong Gao, Hongyuan Xi, Qianwen Wu, Ling Lyu, Qifeng Zhu, Qianqian Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) + HMG protocol vs ultra-long gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol in patients with advanced ovarian endometriosis who received in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Three hundred patients with advanced ovary endometriosis who underwent IVF were included, and embryological and clinical outcomes were assessed between March 2017 and September 2017. Patients were divided into MPA + HMG group and 1-month ultra-long GnRHa protocol group. RESULTS: Lower hMG dose and shorter medication time were found in the MPA + HMG group than in the GnRHa group (P < 0.05). Follicle to-Oocyte Index was significantly different between MPA + HMG group and GnRHa group (P < 0.001). No differences were found in the ovary response and numbers of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes and viable embryos. The clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes were similar between MPA + HMG group and GnRHa group, and these outcomes were independent of fresh or frozen embryo transfer in the GnRHa protocol group. There were no significant differences in the time to embryo transfer, medical cost and adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy outcomes after MPA + HMG protocol are similar to those after ultra-long GnRHa protocol in women with ovarian endometriosis. MPA + HMG protocol may be an alternative to ultra-long GnRHa protocol for IVF in ovary endometriosis patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-17010924) PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: In conclusion, the administration of MPA in COH showed similar number of oocytes retrieved, no premature LH surge, and similar pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI as compared to the one-month long protocol. The use of MPA in COH appears to be promising although many questions remain to be elucidated, including the dose and time of progestin priming as well as its possible influence on the oocyte development potential and microenvironment. Given their good tolerability, few metabolic influence, and low cost, progestogens provide a novel alternative to the conventional protocol for patients with endometriosis. BioMed Central 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9531409/ /pubmed/36195878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01500-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Guo, Haiyan
Du, Tong
Gao, Hongyuan
Xi, Qianwen
Wu, Ling
Lyu, Qifeng
Zhu, Qianqian
The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01500-z
work_keys_str_mv AT guohaiyan thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dutong thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaohongyuan thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiqianwen thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuling thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lyuqifeng thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhuqianqian thecomparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guohaiyan comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dutong comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaohongyuan comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiqianwen comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuling comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lyuqifeng comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhuqianqian comparisonoftwodifferentprotocolsultralongversusmedroxyprogesteroneacetateinwomenwithovarianendometriosisaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial