Cargando…

Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women.  METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multi-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Rui, Zhang, Yunshan, Liang, Xiaoyan, Song, Xueru, Wei, Zhaolian, Liu, Jianqiao, Yang, Yezhou, Tan, Jichun, Zhang, Qingxue, Sun, Yingpu, Wang, Wei, Qian, Weiping, Jin, Lei, Wang, Shuyu, Xu, Yang, Yang, Jing, Goethberg, Marie, Mannaerts, Bernadette, Wu, Wen, Zheng, Zugeng, Qiao, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y
_version_ 1784801915672985600
author Yang, Rui
Zhang, Yunshan
Liang, Xiaoyan
Song, Xueru
Wei, Zhaolian
Liu, Jianqiao
Yang, Yezhou
Tan, Jichun
Zhang, Qingxue
Sun, Yingpu
Wang, Wei
Qian, Weiping
Jin, Lei
Wang, Shuyu
Xu, Yang
Yang, Jing
Goethberg, Marie
Mannaerts, Bernadette
Wu, Wen
Zheng, Zugeng
Qiao, Jie
author_facet Yang, Rui
Zhang, Yunshan
Liang, Xiaoyan
Song, Xueru
Wei, Zhaolian
Liu, Jianqiao
Yang, Yezhou
Tan, Jichun
Zhang, Qingxue
Sun, Yingpu
Wang, Wei
Qian, Weiping
Jin, Lei
Wang, Shuyu
Xu, Yang
Yang, Jing
Goethberg, Marie
Mannaerts, Bernadette
Wu, Wen
Zheng, Zugeng
Qiao, Jie
author_sort Yang, Rui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women.  METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multi-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority trial (GRAPE) including 759 Chinese women (aged 20–40 years) recruited in 16 reproductive medicine clinics in China. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to be treated with either follitropin delta dose based on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and body weight or conventional dosing with follitropin alfa following a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority margin -10.0%). RESULTS: 378 in the follitropin delta group and 381 in the follitropin alfa group were randomized and exposed. Non-inferiority was confirmed with respect to ongoing pregnancy with rates of 31.0% vs. 25.7% for follitropin delta compared to follitropin alfa, estimated mean difference of 5.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3% to 11.5%). The clinical pregnancy rate (35.4% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.239) and live birth rate (31.0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.101) were comparable between the follitropin delta group and the follitropin alfa group. Overall, the individualized follitropin delta treatment resulted in fewer oocytes retrieved compared to follitropin alfa treatment (10.3 ± 6.2 vs. 12.5 ± 7.5, P < 0.001), which was mainly due to fewer oocytes (10.5 ± 6.4 vs. 13.9 ± 7.8) in women with AMH ≥ 15 pmol/L. Accordingly there was a lower incidence of early ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions (6.1% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.013). A daily follitropin delta dose of 10.2 µg (95% CI: 9.3—11.2 µg) was estimated to provide the same number of oocytes retrieved as a starting dose of 150 IU/d of follitropin alfa. CONCLUSION: Follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen showed similar efficacy and improved safety compared with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03296527. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95315012022-10-05 Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection Yang, Rui Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Song, Xueru Wei, Zhaolian Liu, Jianqiao Yang, Yezhou Tan, Jichun Zhang, Qingxue Sun, Yingpu Wang, Wei Qian, Weiping Jin, Lei Wang, Shuyu Xu, Yang Yang, Jing Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Wu, Wen Zheng, Zugeng Qiao, Jie Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women.  METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multi-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority trial (GRAPE) including 759 Chinese women (aged 20–40 years) recruited in 16 reproductive medicine clinics in China. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to be treated with either follitropin delta dose based on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and body weight or conventional dosing with follitropin alfa following a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority margin -10.0%). RESULTS: 378 in the follitropin delta group and 381 in the follitropin alfa group were randomized and exposed. Non-inferiority was confirmed with respect to ongoing pregnancy with rates of 31.0% vs. 25.7% for follitropin delta compared to follitropin alfa, estimated mean difference of 5.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3% to 11.5%). The clinical pregnancy rate (35.4% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.239) and live birth rate (31.0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.101) were comparable between the follitropin delta group and the follitropin alfa group. Overall, the individualized follitropin delta treatment resulted in fewer oocytes retrieved compared to follitropin alfa treatment (10.3 ± 6.2 vs. 12.5 ± 7.5, P < 0.001), which was mainly due to fewer oocytes (10.5 ± 6.4 vs. 13.9 ± 7.8) in women with AMH ≥ 15 pmol/L. Accordingly there was a lower incidence of early ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions (6.1% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.013). A daily follitropin delta dose of 10.2 µg (95% CI: 9.3—11.2 µg) was estimated to provide the same number of oocytes retrieved as a starting dose of 150 IU/d of follitropin alfa. CONCLUSION: Follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen showed similar efficacy and improved safety compared with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03296527. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y. BioMed Central 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9531501/ /pubmed/36195924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Rui
Zhang, Yunshan
Liang, Xiaoyan
Song, Xueru
Wei, Zhaolian
Liu, Jianqiao
Yang, Yezhou
Tan, Jichun
Zhang, Qingxue
Sun, Yingpu
Wang, Wei
Qian, Weiping
Jin, Lei
Wang, Shuyu
Xu, Yang
Yang, Jing
Goethberg, Marie
Mannaerts, Bernadette
Wu, Wen
Zheng, Zugeng
Qiao, Jie
Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_fullStr Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_short Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
title_sort comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yangrui comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT zhangyunshan comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT liangxiaoyan comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT songxueru comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT weizhaolian comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT liujianqiao comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT yangyezhou comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT tanjichun comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT zhangqingxue comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT sunyingpu comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT wangwei comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT qianweiping comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT jinlei comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT wangshuyu comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT xuyang comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT yangjing comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT goethbergmarie comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT mannaertsbernadette comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT wuwen comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT zhengzugeng comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT qiaojie comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection