Cargando…
Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multi-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority tri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y |
_version_ | 1784801915672985600 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Rui Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Song, Xueru Wei, Zhaolian Liu, Jianqiao Yang, Yezhou Tan, Jichun Zhang, Qingxue Sun, Yingpu Wang, Wei Qian, Weiping Jin, Lei Wang, Shuyu Xu, Yang Yang, Jing Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Wu, Wen Zheng, Zugeng Qiao, Jie |
author_facet | Yang, Rui Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Song, Xueru Wei, Zhaolian Liu, Jianqiao Yang, Yezhou Tan, Jichun Zhang, Qingxue Sun, Yingpu Wang, Wei Qian, Weiping Jin, Lei Wang, Shuyu Xu, Yang Yang, Jing Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Wu, Wen Zheng, Zugeng Qiao, Jie |
author_sort | Yang, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multi-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority trial (GRAPE) including 759 Chinese women (aged 20–40 years) recruited in 16 reproductive medicine clinics in China. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to be treated with either follitropin delta dose based on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and body weight or conventional dosing with follitropin alfa following a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority margin -10.0%). RESULTS: 378 in the follitropin delta group and 381 in the follitropin alfa group were randomized and exposed. Non-inferiority was confirmed with respect to ongoing pregnancy with rates of 31.0% vs. 25.7% for follitropin delta compared to follitropin alfa, estimated mean difference of 5.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3% to 11.5%). The clinical pregnancy rate (35.4% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.239) and live birth rate (31.0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.101) were comparable between the follitropin delta group and the follitropin alfa group. Overall, the individualized follitropin delta treatment resulted in fewer oocytes retrieved compared to follitropin alfa treatment (10.3 ± 6.2 vs. 12.5 ± 7.5, P < 0.001), which was mainly due to fewer oocytes (10.5 ± 6.4 vs. 13.9 ± 7.8) in women with AMH ≥ 15 pmol/L. Accordingly there was a lower incidence of early ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions (6.1% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.013). A daily follitropin delta dose of 10.2 µg (95% CI: 9.3—11.2 µg) was estimated to provide the same number of oocytes retrieved as a starting dose of 150 IU/d of follitropin alfa. CONCLUSION: Follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen showed similar efficacy and improved safety compared with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03296527. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9531501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95315012022-10-05 Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection Yang, Rui Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Song, Xueru Wei, Zhaolian Liu, Jianqiao Yang, Yezhou Tan, Jichun Zhang, Qingxue Sun, Yingpu Wang, Wei Qian, Weiping Jin, Lei Wang, Shuyu Xu, Yang Yang, Jing Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Wu, Wen Zheng, Zugeng Qiao, Jie Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the randomized, multi-center, assessor-blind, non-inferiority trial (GRAPE) including 759 Chinese women (aged 20–40 years) recruited in 16 reproductive medicine clinics in China. Women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to be treated with either follitropin delta dose based on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and body weight or conventional dosing with follitropin alfa following a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority margin -10.0%). RESULTS: 378 in the follitropin delta group and 381 in the follitropin alfa group were randomized and exposed. Non-inferiority was confirmed with respect to ongoing pregnancy with rates of 31.0% vs. 25.7% for follitropin delta compared to follitropin alfa, estimated mean difference of 5.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3% to 11.5%). The clinical pregnancy rate (35.4% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.239) and live birth rate (31.0% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.101) were comparable between the follitropin delta group and the follitropin alfa group. Overall, the individualized follitropin delta treatment resulted in fewer oocytes retrieved compared to follitropin alfa treatment (10.3 ± 6.2 vs. 12.5 ± 7.5, P < 0.001), which was mainly due to fewer oocytes (10.5 ± 6.4 vs. 13.9 ± 7.8) in women with AMH ≥ 15 pmol/L. Accordingly there was a lower incidence of early ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions (6.1% vs. 11.0%, P = 0.013). A daily follitropin delta dose of 10.2 µg (95% CI: 9.3—11.2 µg) was estimated to provide the same number of oocytes retrieved as a starting dose of 150 IU/d of follitropin alfa. CONCLUSION: Follitropin delta in its individualized fixed-dose regimen showed similar efficacy and improved safety compared with follitropin alfa in a conventional adjustable dosing regimen in Chinese women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03296527. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y. BioMed Central 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9531501/ /pubmed/36195924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yang, Rui Zhang, Yunshan Liang, Xiaoyan Song, Xueru Wei, Zhaolian Liu, Jianqiao Yang, Yezhou Tan, Jichun Zhang, Qingxue Sun, Yingpu Wang, Wei Qian, Weiping Jin, Lei Wang, Shuyu Xu, Yang Yang, Jing Goethberg, Marie Mannaerts, Bernadette Wu, Wen Zheng, Zugeng Qiao, Jie Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title | Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_full | Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_fullStr | Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_short | Comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in Chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
title_sort | comparative clinical outcome following individualized follitropin delta dosing in chinese women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36195924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01016-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangrui comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT zhangyunshan comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT liangxiaoyan comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT songxueru comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT weizhaolian comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT liujianqiao comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT yangyezhou comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT tanjichun comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT zhangqingxue comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT sunyingpu comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT wangwei comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT qianweiping comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT jinlei comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT wangshuyu comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT xuyang comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT yangjing comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT goethbergmarie comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT mannaertsbernadette comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT wuwen comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT zhengzugeng comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection AT qiaojie comparativeclinicaloutcomefollowingindividualizedfollitropindeltadosinginchinesewomenundergoingovarianstimulationforinvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection |