Cargando…

Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) concomitant with coronary artery disease (CAD) may increase the risk of thromboembolism. Antithrombotic therapy for NVAF patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains contradictory and challenging. This study aimed to assess the saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Yunan, Xu, Jing, Wang, Liang, Ye, Zi, Chen, Zhisong, Chen, Fadong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02865-6
_version_ 1784801918568103936
author Yu, Yunan
Xu, Jing
Wang, Liang
Ye, Zi
Chen, Zhisong
Chen, Fadong
author_facet Yu, Yunan
Xu, Jing
Wang, Liang
Ye, Zi
Chen, Zhisong
Chen, Fadong
author_sort Yu, Yunan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) concomitant with coronary artery disease (CAD) may increase the risk of thromboembolism. Antithrombotic therapy for NVAF patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains contradictory and challenging. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in a cohort of patients with NVAF and PCI. METHODS: A total of 109 patients undergoing LAAC procedures between March 2017 and December 2020 were categorized into 2 groups, Group I included 36 patients with PCI while group II included 73 patients without. Peri-procedural and long-term complications, as well as ischemia and bleeding events, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Group I had more diabetes mellitus (55.6% vs. 26.0%; p = 0.003), higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (5.44 ± 1.85 vs. 4.22 ± 1.64; p = 0.002) and HAS-BLED scores (3.39 ± 0.93 vs. 2.74 ± 1.05; p = 0.003) compared to Group II. Procedure-related complications within 7 days were similar in both groups (8.3% vs. 8.2%; P = 1.000). Over a median follow-up period of 20.9 months, there were no significant differences between two subgroups with regard to cardiovascular death (2.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.330), stroke/transient ischemic attack (2.8% vs. 5.5%, p = 1.000), major bleeding (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.000) and device-related thrombus (8.3% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.104). The observed annualized thromboembolic and major bleeding events determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis decreased by 82.4% and 100% in group I, 55.9% and 75.8% in group II, respectively. CONCLUSION: LAAC is a safe and effective option for stroke prevention in NVAF patients with PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95315152022-10-05 Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention Yu, Yunan Xu, Jing Wang, Liang Ye, Zi Chen, Zhisong Chen, Fadong BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research OBJECTIVES: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) concomitant with coronary artery disease (CAD) may increase the risk of thromboembolism. Antithrombotic therapy for NVAF patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains contradictory and challenging. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in a cohort of patients with NVAF and PCI. METHODS: A total of 109 patients undergoing LAAC procedures between March 2017 and December 2020 were categorized into 2 groups, Group I included 36 patients with PCI while group II included 73 patients without. Peri-procedural and long-term complications, as well as ischemia and bleeding events, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Group I had more diabetes mellitus (55.6% vs. 26.0%; p = 0.003), higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (5.44 ± 1.85 vs. 4.22 ± 1.64; p = 0.002) and HAS-BLED scores (3.39 ± 0.93 vs. 2.74 ± 1.05; p = 0.003) compared to Group II. Procedure-related complications within 7 days were similar in both groups (8.3% vs. 8.2%; P = 1.000). Over a median follow-up period of 20.9 months, there were no significant differences between two subgroups with regard to cardiovascular death (2.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.330), stroke/transient ischemic attack (2.8% vs. 5.5%, p = 1.000), major bleeding (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 1.000) and device-related thrombus (8.3% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.104). The observed annualized thromboembolic and major bleeding events determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis decreased by 82.4% and 100% in group I, 55.9% and 75.8% in group II, respectively. CONCLUSION: LAAC is a safe and effective option for stroke prevention in NVAF patients with PCI. BioMed Central 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9531515/ /pubmed/36192682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02865-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yu, Yunan
Xu, Jing
Wang, Liang
Ye, Zi
Chen, Zhisong
Chen, Fadong
Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
title Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
title_fullStr Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full_unstemmed Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
title_short Left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
title_sort left atrial appendage closure in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36192682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02865-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyunan leftatrialappendageclosureinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientswithpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT xujing leftatrialappendageclosureinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientswithpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT wangliang leftatrialappendageclosureinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientswithpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT yezi leftatrialappendageclosureinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientswithpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT chenzhisong leftatrialappendageclosureinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientswithpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT chenfadong leftatrialappendageclosureinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationpatientswithpercutaneouscoronaryintervention