Cargando…

Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion

PURPOSE: Cell salvage is the process by which blood lost in surgery is collected and washed or filtered to produce autologous blood for re-transfusion to the patient. Cell salvage aims to reduce the need for donor blood. Centrifugal cell salvage washing technique is a preferred medical treatment in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amenge, James, Scherphof, Sabine, Osemwengie, Dion, Nierich, Arno, Lagerberg, Johan W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204560
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S367918
_version_ 1784801935364194304
author Amenge, James
Scherphof, Sabine
Osemwengie, Dion
Nierich, Arno
Lagerberg, Johan W
author_facet Amenge, James
Scherphof, Sabine
Osemwengie, Dion
Nierich, Arno
Lagerberg, Johan W
author_sort Amenge, James
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cell salvage is the process by which blood lost in surgery is collected and washed or filtered to produce autologous blood for re-transfusion to the patient. Cell salvage aims to reduce the need for donor blood. Centrifugal cell salvage washing technique is a preferred medical treatment in order to retain lost red blood cells (RBCs) without contaminants. Although this technology very efficiently collects and washes shed blood, it is costly and often impractical or unavailable, especially in middle- or low-income countries. This study assessed two innovative filter devices as an alternative to centrifugal cell salvage technology: a coarse collection filter device (Hemafuse) and a microfiltration device (HemoClear). In contrast to centrifugal technology, both filter devices do not require electricity, nor costly equipment and extensive training. We compared the effectiveness of these filtration technologies to remove plasma constituents and recover and concentrate the cellular components with centrifugal technology (autoLog(®) device). METHODS: Whole blood was processed with each technology according to the device manufacturer’s instructions. Before and after processing, the blood products were analyzed for supernatant solutes and cellular composition. RESULTS: The centrifugal technology confirmed its efficacy to remove potentially harmful solutes and capture red blood cells. The microfiltration technology (HemoClear) reached comparable levels of removal of solutes, with a potential advantage over centrifugal technology in the ability to also recover platelets. The coarse filtration technology (Hemafuse) had no washing capacity but, like the microfiltration technology, has the advantage of recovering platelets. CONCLUSION: Innovative filtration devices represent an alternative to centrifugal technology in the preparation of autologous blood for reinfusion. The HemoClear technology for the first time enables the recovery of washed platelets and red blood cells. Clinical trials will have to be performed to investigate the clinical value of this new autologous blood product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95316112022-10-05 Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion Amenge, James Scherphof, Sabine Osemwengie, Dion Nierich, Arno Lagerberg, Johan W J Blood Med Original Research PURPOSE: Cell salvage is the process by which blood lost in surgery is collected and washed or filtered to produce autologous blood for re-transfusion to the patient. Cell salvage aims to reduce the need for donor blood. Centrifugal cell salvage washing technique is a preferred medical treatment in order to retain lost red blood cells (RBCs) without contaminants. Although this technology very efficiently collects and washes shed blood, it is costly and often impractical or unavailable, especially in middle- or low-income countries. This study assessed two innovative filter devices as an alternative to centrifugal cell salvage technology: a coarse collection filter device (Hemafuse) and a microfiltration device (HemoClear). In contrast to centrifugal technology, both filter devices do not require electricity, nor costly equipment and extensive training. We compared the effectiveness of these filtration technologies to remove plasma constituents and recover and concentrate the cellular components with centrifugal technology (autoLog(®) device). METHODS: Whole blood was processed with each technology according to the device manufacturer’s instructions. Before and after processing, the blood products were analyzed for supernatant solutes and cellular composition. RESULTS: The centrifugal technology confirmed its efficacy to remove potentially harmful solutes and capture red blood cells. The microfiltration technology (HemoClear) reached comparable levels of removal of solutes, with a potential advantage over centrifugal technology in the ability to also recover platelets. The coarse filtration technology (Hemafuse) had no washing capacity but, like the microfiltration technology, has the advantage of recovering platelets. CONCLUSION: Innovative filtration devices represent an alternative to centrifugal technology in the preparation of autologous blood for reinfusion. The HemoClear technology for the first time enables the recovery of washed platelets and red blood cells. Clinical trials will have to be performed to investigate the clinical value of this new autologous blood product. Dove 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9531611/ /pubmed/36204560 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S367918 Text en © 2022 Amenge et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Amenge, James
Scherphof, Sabine
Osemwengie, Dion
Nierich, Arno
Lagerberg, Johan W
Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion
title Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion
title_full Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion
title_fullStr Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion
title_short Comparison of Washing Efficiency and Recovery of Blood Cells Between Centrifugation, Coarse Filtration and Microfiltration Techniques to Prepare Autologous Blood for Transfusion
title_sort comparison of washing efficiency and recovery of blood cells between centrifugation, coarse filtration and microfiltration techniques to prepare autologous blood for transfusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204560
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S367918
work_keys_str_mv AT amengejames comparisonofwashingefficiencyandrecoveryofbloodcellsbetweencentrifugationcoarsefiltrationandmicrofiltrationtechniquestoprepareautologousbloodfortransfusion
AT scherphofsabine comparisonofwashingefficiencyandrecoveryofbloodcellsbetweencentrifugationcoarsefiltrationandmicrofiltrationtechniquestoprepareautologousbloodfortransfusion
AT osemwengiedion comparisonofwashingefficiencyandrecoveryofbloodcellsbetweencentrifugationcoarsefiltrationandmicrofiltrationtechniquestoprepareautologousbloodfortransfusion
AT niericharno comparisonofwashingefficiencyandrecoveryofbloodcellsbetweencentrifugationcoarsefiltrationandmicrofiltrationtechniquestoprepareautologousbloodfortransfusion
AT lagerbergjohanw comparisonofwashingefficiencyandrecoveryofbloodcellsbetweencentrifugationcoarsefiltrationandmicrofiltrationtechniquestoprepareautologousbloodfortransfusion