Cargando…

Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity

The challenge for medical schools in Japan is to develop research activities for innovation. This study aimed at analyzing the connection between the research output of “promising researchers” (next-generation leaders in terms of research activity) and their supervisors' past research activitie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashiguchi, Akiko, Hamada, Hiroka, Takahashi, Satoru, Honda, Keisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204454
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.990921
_version_ 1784801967700180992
author Hashiguchi, Akiko
Hamada, Hiroka
Takahashi, Satoru
Honda, Keisuke
author_facet Hashiguchi, Akiko
Hamada, Hiroka
Takahashi, Satoru
Honda, Keisuke
author_sort Hashiguchi, Akiko
collection PubMed
description The challenge for medical schools in Japan is to develop research activities for innovation. This study aimed at analyzing the connection between the research output of “promising researchers” (next-generation leaders in terms of research activity) and their supervisors' past research activities to identify those factors that impact researchers' performance. Activity was analyzed from the viewpoints of productivity, coauthorship networks, and research impact using a novel index called the Research Diversity Index (REDi) that quantifies crossdisciplinarity. Research funding, which has not yet been fully utilized in correlation studies of the characteristics of authors, was also considered in this study. For the promising researchers extracted using betweenness centrality scores within coauthorship networks, there were diachronic correlations between the records of the promising researchers and those of their supervisors. Supervisor leadership as measured by the number of last-authored publications and extent of networking had a positive effect on the promising researchers productivity. Supervisors' research style of integrating knowledge from multiple fields, as measured by REDi, was negatively correlated with the publication impact of promising researchers, suggesting that REDi is useful as a novel indicator of research quality not being captured by existing indices. It was also noted that establishing an academic presence through extensive collaborations could be advantageous for obtaining research funding, especially from top-down government programs. The possible implications of this study for promoting research activities are the importance of incorporating new doctorates into research groups at an early stage and that of promoting interinstitutional, crossdisciplinary collaborations. CLASSIFICATION CODE: MSC: 62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta-analysis. JEL: Z1Z10 Cultural Economics • Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology- General.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95317512022-10-05 Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity Hashiguchi, Akiko Hamada, Hiroka Takahashi, Satoru Honda, Keisuke Front Res Metr Anal Research Metrics and Analytics The challenge for medical schools in Japan is to develop research activities for innovation. This study aimed at analyzing the connection between the research output of “promising researchers” (next-generation leaders in terms of research activity) and their supervisors' past research activities to identify those factors that impact researchers' performance. Activity was analyzed from the viewpoints of productivity, coauthorship networks, and research impact using a novel index called the Research Diversity Index (REDi) that quantifies crossdisciplinarity. Research funding, which has not yet been fully utilized in correlation studies of the characteristics of authors, was also considered in this study. For the promising researchers extracted using betweenness centrality scores within coauthorship networks, there were diachronic correlations between the records of the promising researchers and those of their supervisors. Supervisor leadership as measured by the number of last-authored publications and extent of networking had a positive effect on the promising researchers productivity. Supervisors' research style of integrating knowledge from multiple fields, as measured by REDi, was negatively correlated with the publication impact of promising researchers, suggesting that REDi is useful as a novel indicator of research quality not being captured by existing indices. It was also noted that establishing an academic presence through extensive collaborations could be advantageous for obtaining research funding, especially from top-down government programs. The possible implications of this study for promoting research activities are the importance of incorporating new doctorates into research groups at an early stage and that of promoting interinstitutional, crossdisciplinary collaborations. CLASSIFICATION CODE: MSC: 62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta-analysis. JEL: Z1Z10 Cultural Economics • Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology- General. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9531751/ /pubmed/36204454 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.990921 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hashiguchi, Hamada, Takahashi and Honda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Research Metrics and Analytics
Hashiguchi, Akiko
Hamada, Hiroka
Takahashi, Satoru
Honda, Keisuke
Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
title Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
title_full Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
title_fullStr Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
title_full_unstemmed Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
title_short Impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by REDi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
title_sort impact of supervisors' research style on young biomedical scientists' capacity development as measured by redi, a novel index of crossdisciplinarity
topic Research Metrics and Analytics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204454
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.990921
work_keys_str_mv AT hashiguchiakiko impactofsupervisorsresearchstyleonyoungbiomedicalscientistscapacitydevelopmentasmeasuredbyredianovelindexofcrossdisciplinarity
AT hamadahiroka impactofsupervisorsresearchstyleonyoungbiomedicalscientistscapacitydevelopmentasmeasuredbyredianovelindexofcrossdisciplinarity
AT takahashisatoru impactofsupervisorsresearchstyleonyoungbiomedicalscientistscapacitydevelopmentasmeasuredbyredianovelindexofcrossdisciplinarity
AT hondakeisuke impactofsupervisorsresearchstyleonyoungbiomedicalscientistscapacitydevelopmentasmeasuredbyredianovelindexofcrossdisciplinarity