Cargando…

Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating disease with limited effective treatment options. Animal paradigms are vital for understanding the pathogenesis of SCI and testing potential therapeutics. The porcine model of SCI is increasingly favored because of its greater similarity to humans. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber-Levine, Carly, Hersh, Andrew M., Jiang, Kelly, Routkevitch, Denis, Tsehay, Yohannes, Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander, Judy, Brendan F., Kerensky, Max, Liu, Ann, Adams, Melanie, Izzi, Jessica, Doloff, Joshua C., Manbachi, Amir, Theodore, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neur.2022.0038
_version_ 1784801997681065984
author Weber-Levine, Carly
Hersh, Andrew M.
Jiang, Kelly
Routkevitch, Denis
Tsehay, Yohannes
Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander
Judy, Brendan F.
Kerensky, Max
Liu, Ann
Adams, Melanie
Izzi, Jessica
Doloff, Joshua C.
Manbachi, Amir
Theodore, Nicholas
author_facet Weber-Levine, Carly
Hersh, Andrew M.
Jiang, Kelly
Routkevitch, Denis
Tsehay, Yohannes
Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander
Judy, Brendan F.
Kerensky, Max
Liu, Ann
Adams, Melanie
Izzi, Jessica
Doloff, Joshua C.
Manbachi, Amir
Theodore, Nicholas
author_sort Weber-Levine, Carly
collection PubMed
description Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating disease with limited effective treatment options. Animal paradigms are vital for understanding the pathogenesis of SCI and testing potential therapeutics. The porcine model of SCI is increasingly favored because of its greater similarity to humans. However, its adoption is limited by the complexities of care and range of testing parameters. Researchers need to consider swine selection, injury method, post-operative care, rehabilitation, behavioral outcomes, and histology metrics. Therefore, we systematically reviewed full-text English-language articles to evaluate study characteristics used in developing a porcine model and summarize the interventions that have been tested using this paradigm. A total of 63 studies were included, with 33 examining SCI pathogenesis and 30 testing interventions. Studies had an average sample size of 15 pigs with an average weight of 26 kg, and most used female swine with injury to the thoracic cord. Injury was most commonly induced by weight drop with compression. The porcine model is amenable to testing various interventions, including mean arterial pressure augmentation (n = 7), electrical stimulation (n = 6), stem cell therapy (n = 5), hypothermia (n = 2), biomaterials (n = 2), gene therapy (n = 2), steroids (n = 1), and nanoparticles (n = 1). It is also notable for its clinical translatability and is emerging as a valuable pre-clinical study tool. This systematic review can serve as a guideline for researchers implementing and testing the porcine SCI model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9531891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95318912022-10-05 Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review Weber-Levine, Carly Hersh, Andrew M. Jiang, Kelly Routkevitch, Denis Tsehay, Yohannes Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander Judy, Brendan F. Kerensky, Max Liu, Ann Adams, Melanie Izzi, Jessica Doloff, Joshua C. Manbachi, Amir Theodore, Nicholas Neurotrauma Rep Original Article Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating disease with limited effective treatment options. Animal paradigms are vital for understanding the pathogenesis of SCI and testing potential therapeutics. The porcine model of SCI is increasingly favored because of its greater similarity to humans. However, its adoption is limited by the complexities of care and range of testing parameters. Researchers need to consider swine selection, injury method, post-operative care, rehabilitation, behavioral outcomes, and histology metrics. Therefore, we systematically reviewed full-text English-language articles to evaluate study characteristics used in developing a porcine model and summarize the interventions that have been tested using this paradigm. A total of 63 studies were included, with 33 examining SCI pathogenesis and 30 testing interventions. Studies had an average sample size of 15 pigs with an average weight of 26 kg, and most used female swine with injury to the thoracic cord. Injury was most commonly induced by weight drop with compression. The porcine model is amenable to testing various interventions, including mean arterial pressure augmentation (n = 7), electrical stimulation (n = 6), stem cell therapy (n = 5), hypothermia (n = 2), biomaterials (n = 2), gene therapy (n = 2), steroids (n = 1), and nanoparticles (n = 1). It is also notable for its clinical translatability and is emerging as a valuable pre-clinical study tool. This systematic review can serve as a guideline for researchers implementing and testing the porcine SCI model. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9531891/ /pubmed/36204385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neur.2022.0038 Text en © Carly Weber-Levine et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Weber-Levine, Carly
Hersh, Andrew M.
Jiang, Kelly
Routkevitch, Denis
Tsehay, Yohannes
Perdomo-Pantoja, Alexander
Judy, Brendan F.
Kerensky, Max
Liu, Ann
Adams, Melanie
Izzi, Jessica
Doloff, Joshua C.
Manbachi, Amir
Theodore, Nicholas
Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_full Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_short Porcine Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
title_sort porcine model of spinal cord injury: a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neur.2022.0038
work_keys_str_mv AT weberlevinecarly porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT hershandrewm porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT jiangkelly porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT routkevitchdenis porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT tsehayyohannes porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT perdomopantojaalexander porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT judybrendanf porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT kerenskymax porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT liuann porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT adamsmelanie porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT izzijessica porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT doloffjoshuac porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT manbachiamir porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview
AT theodorenicholas porcinemodelofspinalcordinjuryasystematicreview