Cargando…

Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases

BACKGROUND: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Wei, Du, Longyi, Cai, Linli, Miao, Tiwei, Mao, Bing, Wen, Fuqiang, Gibson, Peter Gerard, Gong, Deying, Zeng, Yan, Kang, Mei, Du, Xinmiao, Qu, Junyan, Wang, Yan, Liu, Xuemei, Feng, Ruizhi, Fu, Juanjuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050
_version_ 1784802025935994880
author Xiao, Wei
Du, Longyi
Cai, Linli
Miao, Tiwei
Mao, Bing
Wen, Fuqiang
Gibson, Peter Gerard
Gong, Deying
Zeng, Yan
Kang, Mei
Du, Xinmiao
Qu, Junyan
Wang, Yan
Liu, Xuemei
Feng, Ruizhi
Fu, Juanjuan
author_facet Xiao, Wei
Du, Longyi
Cai, Linli
Miao, Tiwei
Mao, Bing
Wen, Fuqiang
Gibson, Peter Gerard
Gong, Deying
Zeng, Yan
Kang, Mei
Du, Xinmiao
Qu, Junyan
Wang, Yan
Liu, Xuemei
Feng, Ruizhi
Fu, Juanjuan
author_sort Xiao, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays. METHODS: Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (≥1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) (χ(2) = 19.83, P < 0.001), serum BDG (≥70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) (χ(2) = 24.65, P < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) (χ(2) = 29.38, P < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (≥2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) (χ(2) = 5.52, P = 0.019) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812–0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824–0.977]) (P = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) (χ(2) = 0.89, P = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) (χ(2) = 4.14, P = 0.042) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (≥0.5 ODI) (χ(2) = 6.95, P = 0.008), BDG (χ(2) = 10.43, P = 0.001), and fungal culture (χ(2) = 12.70, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9532040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95320402022-10-06 Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases Xiao, Wei Du, Longyi Cai, Linli Miao, Tiwei Mao, Bing Wen, Fuqiang Gibson, Peter Gerard Gong, Deying Zeng, Yan Kang, Mei Du, Xinmiao Qu, Junyan Wang, Yan Liu, Xuemei Feng, Ruizhi Fu, Juanjuan Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays. METHODS: Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (≥1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) (χ(2) = 19.83, P < 0.001), serum BDG (≥70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) (χ(2) = 24.65, P < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) (χ(2) = 29.38, P < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (≥2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) (χ(2) = 5.52, P = 0.019) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812–0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824–0.977]) (P = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) (χ(2) = 0.89, P = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) (χ(2) = 4.14, P = 0.042) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (≥0.5 ODI) (χ(2) = 6.95, P = 0.008), BDG (χ(2) = 10.43, P = 0.001), and fungal culture (χ(2) = 12.70, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-05 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9532040/ /pubmed/35861304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Xiao, Wei
Du, Longyi
Cai, Linli
Miao, Tiwei
Mao, Bing
Wen, Fuqiang
Gibson, Peter Gerard
Gong, Deying
Zeng, Yan
Kang, Mei
Du, Xinmiao
Qu, Junyan
Wang, Yan
Liu, Xuemei
Feng, Ruizhi
Fu, Juanjuan
Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
title Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
title_full Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
title_fullStr Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
title_full_unstemmed Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
title_short Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
title_sort existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaowei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT dulongyi existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT cailinli existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT miaotiwei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT maobing existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT wenfuqiang existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT gibsonpetergerard existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT gongdeying existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT zengyan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT kangmei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT duxinmiao existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT qujunyan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT wangyan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT liuxuemei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT fengruizhi existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases
AT fujuanjuan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases