Cargando…
Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases
BACKGROUND: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050 |
_version_ | 1784802025935994880 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Wei Du, Longyi Cai, Linli Miao, Tiwei Mao, Bing Wen, Fuqiang Gibson, Peter Gerard Gong, Deying Zeng, Yan Kang, Mei Du, Xinmiao Qu, Junyan Wang, Yan Liu, Xuemei Feng, Ruizhi Fu, Juanjuan |
author_facet | Xiao, Wei Du, Longyi Cai, Linli Miao, Tiwei Mao, Bing Wen, Fuqiang Gibson, Peter Gerard Gong, Deying Zeng, Yan Kang, Mei Du, Xinmiao Qu, Junyan Wang, Yan Liu, Xuemei Feng, Ruizhi Fu, Juanjuan |
author_sort | Xiao, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays. METHODS: Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (≥1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) (χ(2) = 19.83, P < 0.001), serum BDG (≥70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) (χ(2) = 24.65, P < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) (χ(2) = 29.38, P < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (≥2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) (χ(2) = 5.52, P = 0.019) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812–0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824–0.977]) (P = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) (χ(2) = 0.89, P = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) (χ(2) = 4.14, P = 0.042) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (≥0.5 ODI) (χ(2) = 6.95, P = 0.008), BDG (χ(2) = 10.43, P = 0.001), and fungal culture (χ(2) = 12.70, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9532040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95320402022-10-06 Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases Xiao, Wei Du, Longyi Cai, Linli Miao, Tiwei Mao, Bing Wen, Fuqiang Gibson, Peter Gerard Gong, Deying Zeng, Yan Kang, Mei Du, Xinmiao Qu, Junyan Wang, Yan Liu, Xuemei Feng, Ruizhi Fu, Juanjuan Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays. METHODS: Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (≥1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) (χ(2) = 19.83, P < 0.001), serum BDG (≥70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) (χ(2) = 24.65, P < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) (χ(2) = 29.38, P < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (≥0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (≥2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) (χ(2) = 5.52, P = 0.019) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812–0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824–0.977]) (P = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) (χ(2) = 0.89, P = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) (χ(2) = 4.14, P = 0.042) than BAL GM (≥1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (≥0.5 ODI) (χ(2) = 6.95, P = 0.008), BDG (χ(2) = 10.43, P = 0.001), and fungal culture (χ(2) = 12.70, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-05 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9532040/ /pubmed/35861304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Xiao, Wei Du, Longyi Cai, Linli Miao, Tiwei Mao, Bing Wen, Fuqiang Gibson, Peter Gerard Gong, Deying Zeng, Yan Kang, Mei Du, Xinmiao Qu, Junyan Wang, Yan Liu, Xuemei Feng, Ruizhi Fu, Juanjuan Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
title | Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
title_full | Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
title_fullStr | Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
title_short | Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
title_sort | existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaowei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT dulongyi existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT cailinli existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT miaotiwei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT maobing existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT wenfuqiang existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT gibsonpetergerard existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT gongdeying existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT zengyan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT kangmei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT duxinmiao existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT qujunyan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT wangyan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT liuxuemei existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT fengruizhi existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases AT fujuanjuan existingtestsvsnovelnoninvasiveassaysfordetectionofinvasiveaspergillosisinpatientswithrespiratorydiseases |