Cargando…

Does augmentation increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws? A biomechanical cadaver study

PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation using anterior plate osteosynthesis currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of symphyseal disruptions. Since postoperative screw loosening with consequent implant failure is frequently observed, this study aims to evaluate if and to what...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavalcanti Kußmaul, Adrian, Schwaabe, Fanny, Becker, Christopher Alexander, Kleber, Christian, Linhart, Christoph, Thorwächter, Christoph, Rubenbauer, Bianka, Böcker, Wolfgang, Greiner, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35364692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01963-6
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation using anterior plate osteosynthesis currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of symphyseal disruptions. Since postoperative screw loosening with consequent implant failure is frequently observed, this study aims to evaluate if and to what extent augmentation can increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws to improve the constructs stability. METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric anterior pelvic rings were separated at the symphyseal joint for bilateral testing, consequently achieving comparable sites. First, one non-augmented screw was drilled into the superior pubic ramus, whereas the contralateral side was primarily augmented. The screws were then withdrawn with a constant speed of 10 mm/min and the fixation strengths determined by the force (N) displacement (mm) curve. Finally, the primary non-augmented site was secondary augmented, representing revision surgery after initial implant failure, and the corresponding fixation strength was measured again. RESULTS: Augmentation compared to non-augmented screws displayed significantly higher pull-out forces with an increase in pull-out force by 377% for primary and 353% for secondary augmentation (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force comparing primary and secondary augmentation (p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary augmentation significantly increases the stability of symphyseal screws and, therefore, potentially decreases rates of implant failure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01963-6.