Cargando…

The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE: The first-pass success rate for endotracheal intubation (ETI) depends on provider experience and exposure. We hypothesize that video laryngoscopy (VL) improves first-pass and overall ETI success rates in low and intermediate experienced airway providers and prevents from unrecognized oesoph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maissan, Iscander, van Lieshout, Esther, de Jong, Timo, van Vledder, Mark, Houmes, Robert Jan, Hartog, Dennis den, Stolker, Robert Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01962-7
_version_ 1784802089758621696
author Maissan, Iscander
van Lieshout, Esther
de Jong, Timo
van Vledder, Mark
Houmes, Robert Jan
Hartog, Dennis den
Stolker, Robert Jan
author_facet Maissan, Iscander
van Lieshout, Esther
de Jong, Timo
van Vledder, Mark
Houmes, Robert Jan
Hartog, Dennis den
Stolker, Robert Jan
author_sort Maissan, Iscander
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The first-pass success rate for endotracheal intubation (ETI) depends on provider experience and exposure. We hypothesize that video laryngoscopy (VL) improves first-pass and overall ETI success rates in low and intermediate experienced airway providers and prevents from unrecognized oesophageal intubations in prehospital settings. METHODS: In this study 3632 patients were included. In all cases, an ambulance nurse, HEMS nurse, or HEMS physician performed prehospital ETI using direct Laryngoscopy (DL) or VL. RESULTS: First-pass ETI success rates for ambulance nurses with DL were 45.5% (391/859) and with VL 64.8% (125/193). For HEMS nurses first-pass success rates were 57.6% (34/59) and 77.2% (125/162) respectively. For HEMS physicians these successes were 85.9% (790/920) and 86.9% (1251/1439). The overall success rate for ambulance nurses with DL was 58.4% (502/859) and 77.2% (149/193) with VL. HEMS nurses successes were 72.9% (43/59) and 87.0% (141/162), respectively. HEMS physician successes were 98.7% (908/920) and 99.0% (1425/1439), respectively. The incidence of unrecognized intubations in the oesophagus before HEMS arrival in traumatic circulatory arrest (TCA) was 30.6% with DL and 37.5% with VL. In medical cardiac arrest cases the incidence was 20% with DL and 0% with VL. CONCLUSION: First-pass and overall ETI success rates for ambulance and HEMS nurses are better with VL. The used device does not affect success rates of HEMS physicians. VL resulted in less unrecognized oesophageal intubations in medical cardiac arrests. In TCA cases VL resulted in more oesophageal intubations when performed by ambulance nurses before HEMS arrival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9532291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95322912022-10-06 The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study Maissan, Iscander van Lieshout, Esther de Jong, Timo van Vledder, Mark Houmes, Robert Jan Hartog, Dennis den Stolker, Robert Jan Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: The first-pass success rate for endotracheal intubation (ETI) depends on provider experience and exposure. We hypothesize that video laryngoscopy (VL) improves first-pass and overall ETI success rates in low and intermediate experienced airway providers and prevents from unrecognized oesophageal intubations in prehospital settings. METHODS: In this study 3632 patients were included. In all cases, an ambulance nurse, HEMS nurse, or HEMS physician performed prehospital ETI using direct Laryngoscopy (DL) or VL. RESULTS: First-pass ETI success rates for ambulance nurses with DL were 45.5% (391/859) and with VL 64.8% (125/193). For HEMS nurses first-pass success rates were 57.6% (34/59) and 77.2% (125/162) respectively. For HEMS physicians these successes were 85.9% (790/920) and 86.9% (1251/1439). The overall success rate for ambulance nurses with DL was 58.4% (502/859) and 77.2% (149/193) with VL. HEMS nurses successes were 72.9% (43/59) and 87.0% (141/162), respectively. HEMS physician successes were 98.7% (908/920) and 99.0% (1425/1439), respectively. The incidence of unrecognized intubations in the oesophagus before HEMS arrival in traumatic circulatory arrest (TCA) was 30.6% with DL and 37.5% with VL. In medical cardiac arrest cases the incidence was 20% with DL and 0% with VL. CONCLUSION: First-pass and overall ETI success rates for ambulance and HEMS nurses are better with VL. The used device does not affect success rates of HEMS physicians. VL resulted in less unrecognized oesophageal intubations in medical cardiac arrests. In TCA cases VL resulted in more oesophageal intubations when performed by ambulance nurses before HEMS arrival. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9532291/ /pubmed/35362731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01962-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Maissan, Iscander
van Lieshout, Esther
de Jong, Timo
van Vledder, Mark
Houmes, Robert Jan
Hartog, Dennis den
Stolker, Robert Jan
The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study
title The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study
title_full The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study
title_short The impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in The Netherlands: a retrospective observational study
title_sort impact of video laryngoscopy on the first-pass success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation in the netherlands: a retrospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35362731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01962-7
work_keys_str_mv AT maissaniscander theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanlieshoutesther theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dejongtimo theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanvleddermark theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT houmesrobertjan theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hartogdennisden theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stolkerrobertjan theimpactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT maissaniscander impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanlieshoutesther impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dejongtimo impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanvleddermark impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT houmesrobertjan impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hartogdennisden impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stolkerrobertjan impactofvideolaryngoscopyonthefirstpasssuccessrateofprehospitalendotrachealintubationinthenetherlandsaretrospectiveobservationalstudy