Cargando…
Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups
PURPOSE: Optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation of acetabular fractures are important in avoiding secondary dislocation and osteoarthritis. Biomechanical studies of treatment options of acetabular fractures aim to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods. As the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35305114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9 |
_version_ | 1784802096021766144 |
---|---|
author | Hinz, Nico Dehoust, Julius Münch, Matthias Seide, Klaus Barth, Tobias Schulz, Arndt-Peter Frosch, Karl-Heinz Hartel, Maximilian J. |
author_facet | Hinz, Nico Dehoust, Julius Münch, Matthias Seide, Klaus Barth, Tobias Schulz, Arndt-Peter Frosch, Karl-Heinz Hartel, Maximilian J. |
author_sort | Hinz, Nico |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation of acetabular fractures are important in avoiding secondary dislocation and osteoarthritis. Biomechanical studies of treatment options of acetabular fractures aim to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods. As the setup of the biomechanical test can influence the experimental results, this review aimed to analyze the characteristics, comparability and clinical implications of studies on biomechanical test setups and finite element analyses in the fixation of acetabular fractures. METHODS: A systematic literature research was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. 44 studies conducting biomechanical analyses of fixation of acetabular fractures were identified, which met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and which were published in English between 2000 and April 16, 2021. The studies were analyzed with respect to distinct parameters, including fracture type, material of pelvis model, investigated fixation construct, loading direction, loading protocol, maximum loading force, outcome parameter and measurement method. RESULTS: In summary, there was no standardized test setup within the studies on fixation constructs for acetabular fractures. It is therefore difficult to compare the studies directly, as they employ a variety of different test parameters. Furthermore, the clinical implications of the biomechanical studies should be scrutinized, since several test parameters were not based on observations of the human physiology. CONCLUSION: The limited comparability and restricted clinical implications should be kept in mind when interpreting the results of biomechanical studies and when designing test setups to evaluate fixation methods for acetabular fractures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9532317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95323172022-10-06 Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups Hinz, Nico Dehoust, Julius Münch, Matthias Seide, Klaus Barth, Tobias Schulz, Arndt-Peter Frosch, Karl-Heinz Hartel, Maximilian J. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Review Article PURPOSE: Optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation of acetabular fractures are important in avoiding secondary dislocation and osteoarthritis. Biomechanical studies of treatment options of acetabular fractures aim to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods. As the setup of the biomechanical test can influence the experimental results, this review aimed to analyze the characteristics, comparability and clinical implications of studies on biomechanical test setups and finite element analyses in the fixation of acetabular fractures. METHODS: A systematic literature research was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. 44 studies conducting biomechanical analyses of fixation of acetabular fractures were identified, which met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and which were published in English between 2000 and April 16, 2021. The studies were analyzed with respect to distinct parameters, including fracture type, material of pelvis model, investigated fixation construct, loading direction, loading protocol, maximum loading force, outcome parameter and measurement method. RESULTS: In summary, there was no standardized test setup within the studies on fixation constructs for acetabular fractures. It is therefore difficult to compare the studies directly, as they employ a variety of different test parameters. Furthermore, the clinical implications of the biomechanical studies should be scrutinized, since several test parameters were not based on observations of the human physiology. CONCLUSION: The limited comparability and restricted clinical implications should be kept in mind when interpreting the results of biomechanical studies and when designing test setups to evaluate fixation methods for acetabular fractures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-19 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9532317/ /pubmed/35305114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hinz, Nico Dehoust, Julius Münch, Matthias Seide, Klaus Barth, Tobias Schulz, Arndt-Peter Frosch, Karl-Heinz Hartel, Maximilian J. Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
title | Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
title_full | Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
title_short | Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
title_sort | biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35305114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinznico biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT dehoustjulius biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT munchmatthias biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT seideklaus biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT barthtobias biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT schulzarndtpeter biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT froschkarlheinz biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups AT hartelmaximilianj biomechanicalanalysisoffixationmethodsinacetabularfracturesasystematicreviewoftestsetups |