Cargando…

Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything

INTRODUCTION: Damage control strategies in resuscitation and (fracture) surgery have become standard of care in the treatment of severely injured patients. It is suggested that damage control improves survival and decreases the incidence of organ failure. However, these strategies can possibly incre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Wessem, Karlijn J. P., Leenen, Luke P. H., Hietbrink, Falco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01916-z
_version_ 1784802097514938368
author van Wessem, Karlijn J. P.
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
author_facet van Wessem, Karlijn J. P.
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
author_sort van Wessem, Karlijn J. P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Damage control strategies in resuscitation and (fracture) surgery have become standard of care in the treatment of severely injured patients. It is suggested that damage control improves survival and decreases the incidence of organ failure. However, these strategies can possibly increase the risk of complications such as infections. Indication for damage control procedures is guided by physiological parameters, type of injury, and the surgeon’s experience. We analyzed outcomes of severely injured patients who underwent emergency surgery. METHODS: Severely injured patients, admitted to a level-1 trauma center ICU from 2016 to 2020 who were in need of ventilator support and required immediate surgical intervention ( ≤24 h) were included. Demographics, treatment, and outcome parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: Hundred ninety-five patients were identified with a median ISS of 33 (IQR 25–38). Ninety-seven patients underwent immediate definitive surgery (ETC group), while 98 patients were first treated according to damage control principles with abbreviated surgery (DCS group). Although ISS was similar in both groups, DCS patients were younger, suffered from more severe truncal injuries, were more frequently in shock with more severe acidosis and coagulopathy, and received more blood products. ETC patients with traumatic brain injury needed more often a craniotomy. Seventy-four percent of DCS patients received definitive surgery in the second surgical procedure. There was no difference in mortality, nor any other outcome including organ failure and infections. CONCLUSIONS: When in severely injured patients treatment is dictated by physiology into either early definitive surgery or damage control with multiple shorter procedures stretched over several days combined with aggressive resuscitation with blood products, outcome is comparable in terms of complications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01916-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9532323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95323232022-10-06 Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything van Wessem, Karlijn J. P. Leenen, Luke P. H. Hietbrink, Falco Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Damage control strategies in resuscitation and (fracture) surgery have become standard of care in the treatment of severely injured patients. It is suggested that damage control improves survival and decreases the incidence of organ failure. However, these strategies can possibly increase the risk of complications such as infections. Indication for damage control procedures is guided by physiological parameters, type of injury, and the surgeon’s experience. We analyzed outcomes of severely injured patients who underwent emergency surgery. METHODS: Severely injured patients, admitted to a level-1 trauma center ICU from 2016 to 2020 who were in need of ventilator support and required immediate surgical intervention ( ≤24 h) were included. Demographics, treatment, and outcome parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: Hundred ninety-five patients were identified with a median ISS of 33 (IQR 25–38). Ninety-seven patients underwent immediate definitive surgery (ETC group), while 98 patients were first treated according to damage control principles with abbreviated surgery (DCS group). Although ISS was similar in both groups, DCS patients were younger, suffered from more severe truncal injuries, were more frequently in shock with more severe acidosis and coagulopathy, and received more blood products. ETC patients with traumatic brain injury needed more often a craniotomy. Seventy-four percent of DCS patients received definitive surgery in the second surgical procedure. There was no difference in mortality, nor any other outcome including organ failure and infections. CONCLUSIONS: When in severely injured patients treatment is dictated by physiology into either early definitive surgery or damage control with multiple shorter procedures stretched over several days combined with aggressive resuscitation with blood products, outcome is comparable in terms of complications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01916-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9532323/ /pubmed/35218406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01916-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
van Wessem, Karlijn J. P.
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
title Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
title_full Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
title_fullStr Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
title_full_unstemmed Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
title_short Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
title_sort physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35218406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01916-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwessemkarlijnjp physiologydictatedtreatmentafterseveretraumatimingiseverything
AT leenenlukeph physiologydictatedtreatmentafterseveretraumatimingiseverything
AT hietbrinkfalco physiologydictatedtreatmentafterseveretraumatimingiseverything