New adverse coronary events in valve-in-valve TAVR and native TAVR—A 2-year matched cohort

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of new adverse coronary events (NACE) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and valve-in-valve TAVR (ViV-TAVR). BACKGROUND: ViV-TAVR is an accepted treatment for degenerative prostheses among patients with high surgical-risk. TAVR studies have sug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koren, Ofir, Patel, Vivek, Naami, Robert, Naami, Edmund, Nagasaka, Takashi, Shechter, Alon, Natanzon, Sharon Shalom, Kohan, Siamak, Allison, Zev, Lerner, Addee, Cheng, Daniel Eugene, Chakravarty, Tarun, Nakamura, Mamoo, Cheng, Wen, Jilaihawi, Hasan, Makkar, Raj R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Cardiovascular Medicine
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1004103
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of new adverse coronary events (NACE) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and valve-in-valve TAVR (ViV-TAVR). BACKGROUND: ViV-TAVR is an accepted treatment for degenerative prostheses among patients with high surgical-risk. TAVR studies have suggested an increased risk of coronary artery obstruction and flow stasis causing thrombus formation. Whether contemporary ViV-TAVR is associated with higher rate of coronary events compared to TAVR is unknown. METHODS: We used data from 1,224 TAVR patients between 2016 and 2021. We propensity-matched patients following ViV-TAVR and TAVR by significant predictors to overcome confounders in patients' baseline characteristics and procedural factors. RESULTS: The matched population included 129 patients in each group. In line with prior reports, there was a higher in-hospital coronary artery obstruction rate with ViV-TAVR (3.1 vs. 1.6%; p = 0.23). Despite this, 2-year cumulative NACE rates were similar between groups (4.7 vs. 6.2%, respectively, p = 0.79), with no difference between its components: myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.210), unplanned coronary catheterization (p = 0.477), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (p = 0.998). Moreover, hypoattenuated leaflets thickening (HALT) at 30-day CT was observed in nearly a quarter of the patients with no difference between groups (23.9 vs. 23.1%, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.50–1.28, p = 0.872). The progression rate of the coronary artery calcium score (CACS), assessed in a third of patients, was similar between groups (p log-rank = 0.468, 95% CI 0.12–1.24). Low coronary artery height was an unfavorable predictor for in-hospital coronary obstruction and 2-year NACE rate (HR 1.20 and HR 1.25, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: At 2-year follow-up, ViV-TAVR was not associated with a higher rate of myocardial infarction, unplanned catheterization, coronary artery bypass grafting, or hypoattenuated leaflet thickening.

Ejemplares similares