Cargando…

Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective

As the global burden of disease caused by multidrug resistant bacteria is a major source of concern, credible clinical alternatives to antibiotic therapy, such as personalized phage therapy, are actively explored. Although phage therapy has been used for more than a century, the issue of an easy to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daubie, Valéry, Chalhoub, Houssein, Blasdel, Bob, Dahma, Hafid, Merabishvili, Maya, Glonti, Tea, De Vos, Nathalie, Quintens, Johan, Pirnay, Jean-Paul, Hallin, Marie, Vandenberg, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1000721
_version_ 1784802175167234048
author Daubie, Valéry
Chalhoub, Houssein
Blasdel, Bob
Dahma, Hafid
Merabishvili, Maya
Glonti, Tea
De Vos, Nathalie
Quintens, Johan
Pirnay, Jean-Paul
Hallin, Marie
Vandenberg, Olivier
author_facet Daubie, Valéry
Chalhoub, Houssein
Blasdel, Bob
Dahma, Hafid
Merabishvili, Maya
Glonti, Tea
De Vos, Nathalie
Quintens, Johan
Pirnay, Jean-Paul
Hallin, Marie
Vandenberg, Olivier
author_sort Daubie, Valéry
collection PubMed
description As the global burden of disease caused by multidrug resistant bacteria is a major source of concern, credible clinical alternatives to antibiotic therapy, such as personalized phage therapy, are actively explored. Although phage therapy has been used for more than a century, the issue of an easy to implement diagnostic tool for determining phage susceptibility that meets current routine clinical needs is still open. In this Review, we summarize the existing methods used for determining phage activity on bacteria, including the three reference methods: the spot test, the double agar overlay plaque assay, and the Appelmans method. The first two methods rely on the principle of challenging the overnight growth of a lawn of bacteria in an agar matrix to a known relative phage to bacteria concentration and represent good screening tools to determine if the tested phage can be used for a “passive” and or “active” treatment. Beside these methods, several techniques, based on “real-time” growth kinetics assays (GKA) have been developed or are under development. They all monitor the growth of clinical isolates in the presence of phages, but use various detection methods, from classical optical density to more sophisticated techniques such as computer-assisted imagery, flow-cytometry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or metabolic indicators. Practical considerations as well as information provided about phage activity are reviewed for each technique. Finally, we also discuss the analytical and interpretative requirements for the implementation of a phage susceptibility testing tool in routine clinical microbiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9532704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95327042022-10-06 Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective Daubie, Valéry Chalhoub, Houssein Blasdel, Bob Dahma, Hafid Merabishvili, Maya Glonti, Tea De Vos, Nathalie Quintens, Johan Pirnay, Jean-Paul Hallin, Marie Vandenberg, Olivier Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology As the global burden of disease caused by multidrug resistant bacteria is a major source of concern, credible clinical alternatives to antibiotic therapy, such as personalized phage therapy, are actively explored. Although phage therapy has been used for more than a century, the issue of an easy to implement diagnostic tool for determining phage susceptibility that meets current routine clinical needs is still open. In this Review, we summarize the existing methods used for determining phage activity on bacteria, including the three reference methods: the spot test, the double agar overlay plaque assay, and the Appelmans method. The first two methods rely on the principle of challenging the overnight growth of a lawn of bacteria in an agar matrix to a known relative phage to bacteria concentration and represent good screening tools to determine if the tested phage can be used for a “passive” and or “active” treatment. Beside these methods, several techniques, based on “real-time” growth kinetics assays (GKA) have been developed or are under development. They all monitor the growth of clinical isolates in the presence of phages, but use various detection methods, from classical optical density to more sophisticated techniques such as computer-assisted imagery, flow-cytometry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or metabolic indicators. Practical considerations as well as information provided about phage activity are reviewed for each technique. Finally, we also discuss the analytical and interpretative requirements for the implementation of a phage susceptibility testing tool in routine clinical microbiology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9532704/ /pubmed/36211951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1000721 Text en Copyright © 2022 Daubie, Chalhoub, Blasdel, Dahma, Merabishvili, Glonti, De Vos, Quintens, Pirnay, Hallin and Vandenberg https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Daubie, Valéry
Chalhoub, Houssein
Blasdel, Bob
Dahma, Hafid
Merabishvili, Maya
Glonti, Tea
De Vos, Nathalie
Quintens, Johan
Pirnay, Jean-Paul
Hallin, Marie
Vandenberg, Olivier
Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective
title Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective
title_full Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective
title_fullStr Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective
title_full_unstemmed Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective
title_short Determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: A routine perspective
title_sort determination of phage susceptibility as a clinical diagnostic tool: a routine perspective
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1000721
work_keys_str_mv AT daubievalery determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT chalhoubhoussein determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT blasdelbob determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT dahmahafid determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT merabishvilimaya determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT glontitea determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT devosnathalie determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT quintensjohan determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT pirnayjeanpaul determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT hallinmarie determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective
AT vandenbergolivier determinationofphagesusceptibilityasaclinicaldiagnostictoolaroutineperspective