Cargando…
Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with limited early screening methods and poor prognosis. Artificial intelligence technology has made a great breakthrough in cancer diagnosis. PURPOSE: We aim to develop a specific interpretable machine learning (ML) predic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975703 |
_version_ | 1784802213049139200 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Meixuan Zhao, Yaqian Dong, Xuhui Jin, Yue Cheng, Shanshan Zhang, Nan Xu, Shilin Gu, Sijia Wu, Yongsong Yang, Jiani Yao, Liangqing Wang, Yu |
author_facet | Wu, Meixuan Zhao, Yaqian Dong, Xuhui Jin, Yue Cheng, Shanshan Zhang, Nan Xu, Shilin Gu, Sijia Wu, Yongsong Yang, Jiani Yao, Liangqing Wang, Yu |
author_sort | Wu, Meixuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with limited early screening methods and poor prognosis. Artificial intelligence technology has made a great breakthrough in cancer diagnosis. PURPOSE: We aim to develop a specific interpretable machine learning (ML) prediction model for the diagnosis and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) based on a variety of biomarkers. METHODS: A total of 521 patients with EOC and 144 patients with benign gynecological diseases were enrolled including derivation datasets and an external validation cohort. The predicted information was acquired by 9 supervised ML methods, through 34 parameters. Behind predicted reasons for the best ML were improved by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. In addition, the prognosis of EOC was analyzed by unsupervised clustering and Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis. RESULTS: ML technology was superior to conventional logistic regression in predicting EOC diagnosis and XGBoost performed best in the external validation datasets. The AUC values of distinguishing EOC and benign disease patients, determining pathological type, grade and clinical stage were 0.958 (0.926-0.989), 0.792 (0.701-0.8834), 0.819 (0.687-0.950) and 0.68 (0.573-0.788) respectively. For negative CA-125 EOC patients, the AUC performance of XGBoost model was 0.835(0.763-0.907). We used unsupervised cluster analysis to identify EOC subgroups with significantly poor overall survival (p-value <0.0001) and recurrence-free survival (p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preoperative characteristics, we proved that ML algorithm can provide an acceptable diagnosis and prognosis prediction model for EOC patients. Meanwhile, SHAP analysis can improve the interpretability of ML models and contribute to precision medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9532858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95328582022-10-06 Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study Wu, Meixuan Zhao, Yaqian Dong, Xuhui Jin, Yue Cheng, Shanshan Zhang, Nan Xu, Shilin Gu, Sijia Wu, Yongsong Yang, Jiani Yao, Liangqing Wang, Yu Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with limited early screening methods and poor prognosis. Artificial intelligence technology has made a great breakthrough in cancer diagnosis. PURPOSE: We aim to develop a specific interpretable machine learning (ML) prediction model for the diagnosis and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) based on a variety of biomarkers. METHODS: A total of 521 patients with EOC and 144 patients with benign gynecological diseases were enrolled including derivation datasets and an external validation cohort. The predicted information was acquired by 9 supervised ML methods, through 34 parameters. Behind predicted reasons for the best ML were improved by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. In addition, the prognosis of EOC was analyzed by unsupervised clustering and Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis. RESULTS: ML technology was superior to conventional logistic regression in predicting EOC diagnosis and XGBoost performed best in the external validation datasets. The AUC values of distinguishing EOC and benign disease patients, determining pathological type, grade and clinical stage were 0.958 (0.926-0.989), 0.792 (0.701-0.8834), 0.819 (0.687-0.950) and 0.68 (0.573-0.788) respectively. For negative CA-125 EOC patients, the AUC performance of XGBoost model was 0.835(0.763-0.907). We used unsupervised cluster analysis to identify EOC subgroups with significantly poor overall survival (p-value <0.0001) and recurrence-free survival (p-value <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preoperative characteristics, we proved that ML algorithm can provide an acceptable diagnosis and prognosis prediction model for EOC patients. Meanwhile, SHAP analysis can improve the interpretability of ML models and contribute to precision medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9532858/ /pubmed/36212430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975703 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wu, Zhao, Dong, Jin, Cheng, Zhang, Xu, Gu, Wu, Yang, Yao and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Wu, Meixuan Zhao, Yaqian Dong, Xuhui Jin, Yue Cheng, Shanshan Zhang, Nan Xu, Shilin Gu, Sijia Wu, Yongsong Yang, Jiani Yao, Liangqing Wang, Yu Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study |
title | Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study |
title_full | Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study |
title_short | Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study |
title_sort | artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.975703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wumeixuan artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT zhaoyaqian artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT dongxuhui artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT jinyue artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT chengshanshan artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT zhangnan artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT xushilin artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT gusijia artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT wuyongsong artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT yangjiani artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT yaoliangqing artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy AT wangyu artificialintelligencebasedpreoperativepredictionsystemfordiagnosisandprognosisinepithelialovariancanceramulticenterstudy |