Cargando…

Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND: Deep learning–assisted eye disease diagnosis technology is increasingly applied in eye disease screening. However, no research has suggested the prerequisites for health care service providers and residents willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to reveal the preferences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Senlin, Li, Liping, Zou, Haidong, Xu, Yi, Lu, Lina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125854
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40249
_version_ 1784802295085531136
author Lin, Senlin
Li, Liping
Zou, Haidong
Xu, Yi
Lu, Lina
author_facet Lin, Senlin
Li, Liping
Zou, Haidong
Xu, Yi
Lu, Lina
author_sort Lin, Senlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep learning–assisted eye disease diagnosis technology is increasingly applied in eye disease screening. However, no research has suggested the prerequisites for health care service providers and residents willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to reveal the preferences of health care service providers and residents for using artificial intelligence (AI) in community-based eye disease screening, particularly their preference for accuracy. METHODS: Discrete choice experiments for health care providers and residents were conducted in Shanghai, China. In total, 34 medical institutions with adequate AI-assisted screening experience participated. A total of 39 medical staff and 318 residents were asked to answer the questionnaire and make a trade-off among alternative screening strategies with different attributes, including missed diagnosis rate, overdiagnosis rate, screening result feedback efficiency, level of ophthalmologist involvement, organizational form, cost, and screening result feedback form. Conditional logit models with the stepwise selection method were used to estimate the preferences. RESULTS: Medical staff preferred high accuracy: The specificity of deep learning models should be more than 90% (odds ratio [OR]=0.61 for 10% overdiagnosis; P<.001), which was much higher than the Food and Drug Administration standards. However, accuracy was not the residents’ preference. Rather, they preferred to have the doctors involved in the screening process. In addition, when compared with a fully manual diagnosis, AI technology was more favored by the medical staff (OR=2.08 for semiautomated AI model and OR=2.39 for fully automated AI model; P<.001), while the residents were in disfavor of the AI technology without doctors’ supervision (OR=0.24; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning model under doctors’ supervision is strongly recommended, and the specificity of the model should be more than 90%. In addition, digital transformation should help medical staff move away from heavy and repetitive work and spend more time on communicating with residents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9533207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95332072022-10-06 Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment Lin, Senlin Li, Liping Zou, Haidong Xu, Yi Lu, Lina J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Deep learning–assisted eye disease diagnosis technology is increasingly applied in eye disease screening. However, no research has suggested the prerequisites for health care service providers and residents willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to reveal the preferences of health care service providers and residents for using artificial intelligence (AI) in community-based eye disease screening, particularly their preference for accuracy. METHODS: Discrete choice experiments for health care providers and residents were conducted in Shanghai, China. In total, 34 medical institutions with adequate AI-assisted screening experience participated. A total of 39 medical staff and 318 residents were asked to answer the questionnaire and make a trade-off among alternative screening strategies with different attributes, including missed diagnosis rate, overdiagnosis rate, screening result feedback efficiency, level of ophthalmologist involvement, organizational form, cost, and screening result feedback form. Conditional logit models with the stepwise selection method were used to estimate the preferences. RESULTS: Medical staff preferred high accuracy: The specificity of deep learning models should be more than 90% (odds ratio [OR]=0.61 for 10% overdiagnosis; P<.001), which was much higher than the Food and Drug Administration standards. However, accuracy was not the residents’ preference. Rather, they preferred to have the doctors involved in the screening process. In addition, when compared with a fully manual diagnosis, AI technology was more favored by the medical staff (OR=2.08 for semiautomated AI model and OR=2.39 for fully automated AI model; P<.001), while the residents were in disfavor of the AI technology without doctors’ supervision (OR=0.24; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning model under doctors’ supervision is strongly recommended, and the specificity of the model should be more than 90%. In addition, digital transformation should help medical staff move away from heavy and repetitive work and spend more time on communicating with residents. JMIR Publications 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9533207/ /pubmed/36125854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40249 Text en ©Senlin Lin, Liping Li, Haidong Zou, Yi Xu, Lina Lu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 20.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lin, Senlin
Li, Liping
Zou, Haidong
Xu, Yi
Lu, Lina
Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
title Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
title_fullStr Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
title_short Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
title_sort medical staff and resident preferences for using deep learning in eye disease screening: discrete choice experiment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125854
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40249
work_keys_str_mv AT linsenlin medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment
AT liliping medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment
AT zouhaidong medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment
AT xuyi medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment
AT lulina medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment