Cargando…
Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment
BACKGROUND: Deep learning–assisted eye disease diagnosis technology is increasingly applied in eye disease screening. However, no research has suggested the prerequisites for health care service providers and residents willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to reveal the preferences...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40249 |
_version_ | 1784802295085531136 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Senlin Li, Liping Zou, Haidong Xu, Yi Lu, Lina |
author_facet | Lin, Senlin Li, Liping Zou, Haidong Xu, Yi Lu, Lina |
author_sort | Lin, Senlin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep learning–assisted eye disease diagnosis technology is increasingly applied in eye disease screening. However, no research has suggested the prerequisites for health care service providers and residents willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to reveal the preferences of health care service providers and residents for using artificial intelligence (AI) in community-based eye disease screening, particularly their preference for accuracy. METHODS: Discrete choice experiments for health care providers and residents were conducted in Shanghai, China. In total, 34 medical institutions with adequate AI-assisted screening experience participated. A total of 39 medical staff and 318 residents were asked to answer the questionnaire and make a trade-off among alternative screening strategies with different attributes, including missed diagnosis rate, overdiagnosis rate, screening result feedback efficiency, level of ophthalmologist involvement, organizational form, cost, and screening result feedback form. Conditional logit models with the stepwise selection method were used to estimate the preferences. RESULTS: Medical staff preferred high accuracy: The specificity of deep learning models should be more than 90% (odds ratio [OR]=0.61 for 10% overdiagnosis; P<.001), which was much higher than the Food and Drug Administration standards. However, accuracy was not the residents’ preference. Rather, they preferred to have the doctors involved in the screening process. In addition, when compared with a fully manual diagnosis, AI technology was more favored by the medical staff (OR=2.08 for semiautomated AI model and OR=2.39 for fully automated AI model; P<.001), while the residents were in disfavor of the AI technology without doctors’ supervision (OR=0.24; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning model under doctors’ supervision is strongly recommended, and the specificity of the model should be more than 90%. In addition, digital transformation should help medical staff move away from heavy and repetitive work and spend more time on communicating with residents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9533207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95332072022-10-06 Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment Lin, Senlin Li, Liping Zou, Haidong Xu, Yi Lu, Lina J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Deep learning–assisted eye disease diagnosis technology is increasingly applied in eye disease screening. However, no research has suggested the prerequisites for health care service providers and residents willing to use it. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to reveal the preferences of health care service providers and residents for using artificial intelligence (AI) in community-based eye disease screening, particularly their preference for accuracy. METHODS: Discrete choice experiments for health care providers and residents were conducted in Shanghai, China. In total, 34 medical institutions with adequate AI-assisted screening experience participated. A total of 39 medical staff and 318 residents were asked to answer the questionnaire and make a trade-off among alternative screening strategies with different attributes, including missed diagnosis rate, overdiagnosis rate, screening result feedback efficiency, level of ophthalmologist involvement, organizational form, cost, and screening result feedback form. Conditional logit models with the stepwise selection method were used to estimate the preferences. RESULTS: Medical staff preferred high accuracy: The specificity of deep learning models should be more than 90% (odds ratio [OR]=0.61 for 10% overdiagnosis; P<.001), which was much higher than the Food and Drug Administration standards. However, accuracy was not the residents’ preference. Rather, they preferred to have the doctors involved in the screening process. In addition, when compared with a fully manual diagnosis, AI technology was more favored by the medical staff (OR=2.08 for semiautomated AI model and OR=2.39 for fully automated AI model; P<.001), while the residents were in disfavor of the AI technology without doctors’ supervision (OR=0.24; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning model under doctors’ supervision is strongly recommended, and the specificity of the model should be more than 90%. In addition, digital transformation should help medical staff move away from heavy and repetitive work and spend more time on communicating with residents. JMIR Publications 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9533207/ /pubmed/36125854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40249 Text en ©Senlin Lin, Liping Li, Haidong Zou, Yi Xu, Lina Lu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 20.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lin, Senlin Li, Liping Zou, Haidong Xu, Yi Lu, Lina Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment |
title | Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_full | Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_fullStr | Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_short | Medical Staff and Resident Preferences for Using Deep Learning in Eye Disease Screening: Discrete Choice Experiment |
title_sort | medical staff and resident preferences for using deep learning in eye disease screening: discrete choice experiment |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125854 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linsenlin medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment AT liliping medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment AT zouhaidong medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment AT xuyi medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment AT lulina medicalstaffandresidentpreferencesforusingdeeplearningineyediseasescreeningdiscretechoiceexperiment |