Cargando…

Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants

INTRODUCTION: The optimal time point for reading the mean wheal diameter (MWD) of a skin prick test (SPT) in infants is not established. We aimed to assess if either of two reading time points of the SPT, 10 or 15 min, was superior to detect allergic sensitization (AS) in 6-month-old infants. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lie, Anine, Wärnberg Gerdin, Sabina, Skrindo, Ingebjørg, Rehbinder, Eva Maria, Jonassen, Christine Monceyron, LeBlanc, Marissa, Staff, Anne Cathrine, Söderhäll, Cilla, Vettukattil, Riyas, Ådalen, Sigve, Aaneland, Hilde, Lødrup Carlsen, Karin Cecilie, Skjerven, Håvard Ove, Nordlund, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522526
_version_ 1784802352837951488
author Lie, Anine
Wärnberg Gerdin, Sabina
Skrindo, Ingebjørg
Rehbinder, Eva Maria
Jonassen, Christine Monceyron
LeBlanc, Marissa
Staff, Anne Cathrine
Söderhäll, Cilla
Vettukattil, Riyas
Ådalen, Sigve
Aaneland, Hilde
Lødrup Carlsen, Karin Cecilie
Skjerven, Håvard Ove
Nordlund, Björn
author_facet Lie, Anine
Wärnberg Gerdin, Sabina
Skrindo, Ingebjørg
Rehbinder, Eva Maria
Jonassen, Christine Monceyron
LeBlanc, Marissa
Staff, Anne Cathrine
Söderhäll, Cilla
Vettukattil, Riyas
Ådalen, Sigve
Aaneland, Hilde
Lødrup Carlsen, Karin Cecilie
Skjerven, Håvard Ove
Nordlund, Björn
author_sort Lie, Anine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal time point for reading the mean wheal diameter (MWD) of a skin prick test (SPT) in infants is not established. We aimed to assess if either of two reading time points of the SPT, 10 or 15 min, was superior to detect allergic sensitization (AS) in 6-month-old infants. METHODS: In 1,431 6-month-old infants from the population-based Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies in children (PreventADALL) mother-child cohort, the SPT was performed with standard solutions for egg, cow's milk, peanut, wheat, soy, birch, timothy, dog, and cat. The MWD was measured after 10 and 15 min. AS was defined as a positive SPT with MWD ≥2 mm larger than the negative control. RESULTS: Overall, 149 (10.4%) infants were sensitized to at least one allergen at 10 and/or 15 min, while 138 (9.6%) had a positive SPT at 10 min and 141 (9.9%) at 15 min. A total of 12,873 allergen pricks were performed with 212 (1.6%) being positive at any time point, 194 (1.5%) positive at 10 min, and 196 (1.5%) positive at 15 min. The mean (95% CI) histamine MWD of 3.8 (3.8, 3.9) mm at 10 min was significantly larger than the 3.6 (3.6, 3.7) mm at 15 min. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Reading the SPT after both 10 and 15 min increased the number of 6-month-old infants with documented AS compared to reading after one time point only. As neither 10 nor 15 min reading time was superior to the other in detecting AS, our results indicate that readings at both time points should be considered. However, the histamine MWD was significantly larger at 10 min compared to 15 min. Reappraisal of SPT reading in infancy may be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9533466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95334662022-10-06 Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants Lie, Anine Wärnberg Gerdin, Sabina Skrindo, Ingebjørg Rehbinder, Eva Maria Jonassen, Christine Monceyron LeBlanc, Marissa Staff, Anne Cathrine Söderhäll, Cilla Vettukattil, Riyas Ådalen, Sigve Aaneland, Hilde Lødrup Carlsen, Karin Cecilie Skjerven, Håvard Ove Nordlund, Björn Int Arch Allergy Immunol Clinical Allergy − Research Article INTRODUCTION: The optimal time point for reading the mean wheal diameter (MWD) of a skin prick test (SPT) in infants is not established. We aimed to assess if either of two reading time points of the SPT, 10 or 15 min, was superior to detect allergic sensitization (AS) in 6-month-old infants. METHODS: In 1,431 6-month-old infants from the population-based Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies in children (PreventADALL) mother-child cohort, the SPT was performed with standard solutions for egg, cow's milk, peanut, wheat, soy, birch, timothy, dog, and cat. The MWD was measured after 10 and 15 min. AS was defined as a positive SPT with MWD ≥2 mm larger than the negative control. RESULTS: Overall, 149 (10.4%) infants were sensitized to at least one allergen at 10 and/or 15 min, while 138 (9.6%) had a positive SPT at 10 min and 141 (9.9%) at 15 min. A total of 12,873 allergen pricks were performed with 212 (1.6%) being positive at any time point, 194 (1.5%) positive at 10 min, and 196 (1.5%) positive at 15 min. The mean (95% CI) histamine MWD of 3.8 (3.8, 3.9) mm at 10 min was significantly larger than the 3.6 (3.6, 3.7) mm at 15 min. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Reading the SPT after both 10 and 15 min increased the number of 6-month-old infants with documented AS compared to reading after one time point only. As neither 10 nor 15 min reading time was superior to the other in detecting AS, our results indicate that readings at both time points should be considered. However, the histamine MWD was significantly larger at 10 min compared to 15 min. Reappraisal of SPT reading in infancy may be warranted. S. Karger AG 2022-08 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9533466/ /pubmed/35350034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522526 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Clinical Allergy − Research Article
Lie, Anine
Wärnberg Gerdin, Sabina
Skrindo, Ingebjørg
Rehbinder, Eva Maria
Jonassen, Christine Monceyron
LeBlanc, Marissa
Staff, Anne Cathrine
Söderhäll, Cilla
Vettukattil, Riyas
Ådalen, Sigve
Aaneland, Hilde
Lødrup Carlsen, Karin Cecilie
Skjerven, Håvard Ove
Nordlund, Björn
Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants
title Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants
title_full Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants
title_fullStr Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants
title_short Evaluation of Skin Prick Test Reading Time at 10 versus 15 min in Young Infants
title_sort evaluation of skin prick test reading time at 10 versus 15 min in young infants
topic Clinical Allergy − Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000522526
work_keys_str_mv AT lieanine evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT warnberggerdinsabina evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT skrindoingebjørg evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT rehbinderevamaria evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT jonassenchristinemonceyron evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT leblancmarissa evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT staffannecathrine evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT soderhallcilla evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT vettukattilriyas evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT adalensigve evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT aanelandhilde evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT lødrupcarlsenkarincecilie evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT skjervenhavardove evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants
AT nordlundbjorn evaluationofskinpricktestreadingtimeat10versus15mininyounginfants