Cargando…

Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain

Preschoolers’ neophobic dispositions mainly target fruits and vegetables. They received a great deal of attention in the past decades as these dispositions represent the main psychological barrier to dietary variety. Recently, children’s food neophobia has been found to be negatively correlated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foinant, Damien, Lafraire, Jérémie, Thibaut, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.951890
_version_ 1784802406965444608
author Foinant, Damien
Lafraire, Jérémie
Thibaut, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Foinant, Damien
Lafraire, Jérémie
Thibaut, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Foinant, Damien
collection PubMed
description Preschoolers’ neophobic dispositions mainly target fruits and vegetables. They received a great deal of attention in the past decades as these dispositions represent the main psychological barrier to dietary variety. Recently, children’s food neophobia has been found to be negatively correlated with their categorization performance (i.e., the accuracy to discriminate between food categories). We investigated categorization strategies among neophobic children, tendencies to favor one type of error over the other (misses over false alarms), in order to compensate for their poor categorization performance. To capture children’s categorization strategies, we used the Signal Detection Theory framework. A first experiment assessed 120 3-to-6-years old children’ sensitivity to discriminate between foods and nonfoods as well as their decision criterion (i.e., response strategy). In a second experiment, we manipulated the influence of food processing. The hypothesis was that food processing acts as a sign of human interventions that decreases uncertainty about edibility and thus promotes feelings of safety in the food domain. 137 children were tested on a food versus nonfood categorization task contrasting whole and sliced stimuli. In both experiments, increased levels of food neophobia were significantly associated with poorer categorization sensitivity and with a more conservative decision criterion (i.e., favoring “it is inedible” errors). Additionally, results from Experiment 2 revealed that food processing did not influence neophobic children, whereas their neophilic counterparts adopted a more liberal decision criterion for sliced stimuli than for whole stimuli. These findings are the first demonstration of a relationship between a decision criterion and food neophobia in young children. These results have strong implications for theories of food neophobia and laid the groundwork for designing novel types of food education interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9533737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95337372022-10-06 Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain Foinant, Damien Lafraire, Jérémie Thibaut, Jean-Pierre Front Nutr Nutrition Preschoolers’ neophobic dispositions mainly target fruits and vegetables. They received a great deal of attention in the past decades as these dispositions represent the main psychological barrier to dietary variety. Recently, children’s food neophobia has been found to be negatively correlated with their categorization performance (i.e., the accuracy to discriminate between food categories). We investigated categorization strategies among neophobic children, tendencies to favor one type of error over the other (misses over false alarms), in order to compensate for their poor categorization performance. To capture children’s categorization strategies, we used the Signal Detection Theory framework. A first experiment assessed 120 3-to-6-years old children’ sensitivity to discriminate between foods and nonfoods as well as their decision criterion (i.e., response strategy). In a second experiment, we manipulated the influence of food processing. The hypothesis was that food processing acts as a sign of human interventions that decreases uncertainty about edibility and thus promotes feelings of safety in the food domain. 137 children were tested on a food versus nonfood categorization task contrasting whole and sliced stimuli. In both experiments, increased levels of food neophobia were significantly associated with poorer categorization sensitivity and with a more conservative decision criterion (i.e., favoring “it is inedible” errors). Additionally, results from Experiment 2 revealed that food processing did not influence neophobic children, whereas their neophilic counterparts adopted a more liberal decision criterion for sliced stimuli than for whole stimuli. These findings are the first demonstration of a relationship between a decision criterion and food neophobia in young children. These results have strong implications for theories of food neophobia and laid the groundwork for designing novel types of food education interventions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9533737/ /pubmed/36211481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.951890 Text en Copyright © 2022 Foinant, Lafraire and Thibaut. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Foinant, Damien
Lafraire, Jérémie
Thibaut, Jean-Pierre
Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
title Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
title_full Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
title_fullStr Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
title_full_unstemmed Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
title_short Tears for pears: Influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
title_sort tears for pears: influence of children’s neophobia on categorization performance and strategy in the food domain
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9533737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36211481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.951890
work_keys_str_mv AT foinantdamien tearsforpearsinfluenceofchildrensneophobiaoncategorizationperformanceandstrategyinthefooddomain
AT lafrairejeremie tearsforpearsinfluenceofchildrensneophobiaoncategorizationperformanceandstrategyinthefooddomain
AT thibautjeanpierre tearsforpearsinfluenceofchildrensneophobiaoncategorizationperformanceandstrategyinthefooddomain